Notes of Decisions
Ohio Mfrs. Assn. v. Ohioans for Drug Price Relief Act (Slip Opinion), 2016 Ohio 5377 (Ohio 2016).
· cites it 33× “So for legal authority, OMA turns to R.C. 3519.06, which provides: No initiative or referendum part-petition is properly verified if it appears on the face thereof, or is made to appear by satisfactory evidence: (A) That the statement required by section 3519.”
Ohio Mfrs.' Assn. v. Ohioans for Drug Price Relief Act (Slip Opinion), 2016 Ohio 3038 (Ohio 2016).
· cites it 8× “2d 186 (1972) (board of elections did not abuse its discretion or act contrary to 2 Booth’s motion also gives rise to a dispute among the parties regarding whether the “statement” referred to throughout R.C. 3519.06 refers only to the circulator’s statement or to the contents of…”
State ex rel. Sinay v. Sodders, 685 N.E.2d 754 (Ohio 1997).
· cites it 5× “05 requires that the petition include a circulator’s statement specifying if the circulator received any consideration for soliciting signatures and a declaration by the circulator that the electors signing the petition did so with knowledge of its contents.”
The State Ex Rel. Jones Et Al. v. Husted, 2016 Ohio 5752 (Ohio 2016).
· cites it 2× “{¶ 61} Although the majority orders Husted to certify the validity of 67 additional signatures in Madison County, 35 of those were collected on part- petitions circulated by Harper that contained a false residential address and should be stricken.”
In Re Protest of Brooks, 801 N.E.2d 503 (Ohio Ct. App. 2003).
· cites it 5× “{¶ 24} Appellant claims that R.C. 3519.06, which grants jurisdiction to the courts of common pleas over an action pertaining to the validity of an initiative petition, restricts the trial court’s review to specific findings of the election board and to the verification of…”
State ex rel. Hodges v. Taft, 591 N.E.2d 1186 (Ohio 1992).
· cites it 2× “’ ” The General Assembly has also provided, in R.C. 3519.06, for “verification” of the petition.”
State ex rel. Colvin v. Brunner, 896 N.E.2d 979 (Ohio 2008).
“91-40 regarding circulator compensation statements is contrary to the commands of R.C. 3519.06 concerning verification. It would be unrealistic to contend that the boards of elections could ignore the secretary’s advice; there is authority that the boards were required to follow…”
State ex rel. Sinay v. Sodders, 1997 Ohio 344 (Ohio 1997).
· cites it 5× “05 requires that the petition include a circulator’s statement specifying if the circulator received any consideration for soliciting signatures and a declaration by the circulator that the electors signing the petition did so with knowledge of its contents.”
State ex rel. Becker v. City of Eastlake, 756 N.E.2d 1228 (Ohio 2001).
“2d at 395, *507 applying an R.C. 3519.06(D) requirement for initiative petitions to a petition seeking to place a proposed charter amendment on the election ballot.”
State ex rel. Hackworth v. Hughes, 776 N.E.2d 1050 (Ohio 2002).
“2d 393 , in which we applied an R.C. 3519.06(D) requirement for initiative petitions to a petition seeking to place a proposed charter amendment on an election ballot.”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 3519.06(A) — 1 case
Ohio Mfrs. Assn. v. Ohioans for Drug Price Relief Act (Slip Opinion), 2016 Ohio 5377 (Ohio 2016).
“So for legal authority, OMA turns to R.C. 3519.06, which provides: No initiative or referendum part-petition is properly verified if it appears on the face thereof, or is made to appear by satisfactory evidence: (A) That the statement required by section 3519.”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 3519.06(C) — 3 cases
Ohio Mfrs. Assn. v. Ohioans for Drug Price Relief Act (Slip Opinion), 2016 Ohio 5377 (Ohio 2016).
“So for legal authority, OMA turns to R.C. 3519.06, which provides: No initiative or referendum part-petition is properly verified if it appears on the face thereof, or is made to appear by satisfactory evidence: (A) That the statement required by section 3519.”
Ohio Mfrs.' Assn. v. Ohioans for Drug Price Relief Act (Slip Opinion), 2016 Ohio 3038 (Ohio 2016).
“2d 186 (1972) (board of elections did not abuse its discretion or act contrary to 2 Booth’s motion also gives rise to a dispute among the parties regarding whether the “statement” referred to throughout R.C. 3519.06 refers only to the circulator’s statement or to the contents of…”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 3519.06(D) — 9 cases
Ohio Mfrs.' Assn. v. Ohioans for Drug Price Relief Act (Slip Opinion), 2016 Ohio 3038 (Ohio 2016).
“2d 186 (1972) (board of elections did not abuse its discretion or act contrary to 2 Booth’s motion also gives rise to a dispute among the parties regarding whether the “statement” referred to throughout R.C. 3519.06 refers only to the circulator’s statement or to the contents of…”
Ohio Mfrs. Assn. v. Ohioans for Drug Price Relief Act (Slip Opinion), 2016 Ohio 5377 (Ohio 2016).
“So for legal authority, OMA turns to R.C. 3519.06, which provides: No initiative or referendum part-petition is properly verified if it appears on the face thereof, or is made to appear by satisfactory evidence: (A) That the statement required by section 3519.”
The State Ex Rel. Jones Et Al. v. Husted, 2016 Ohio 5752 (Ohio 2016).
“{¶ 61} Although the majority orders Husted to certify the validity of 67 additional signatures in Madison County, 35 of those were collected on part- petitions circulated by Harper that contained a false residential address and should be stricken.”
State ex rel. Becker v. City of Eastlake, 756 N.E.2d 1228 (Ohio 2001).
“2d at 395, *507 applying an R.C. 3519.06(D) requirement for initiative petitions to a petition seeking to place a proposed charter amendment on the election ballot.”
State ex rel. Hackworth v. Hughes, 776 N.E.2d 1050 (Ohio 2002).
“2d 393 , in which we applied an R.C. 3519.06(D) requirement for initiative petitions to a petition seeking to place a proposed charter amendment on an election ballot.”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 3519.06(E) — 1 case
Ohio Mfrs. Assn. v. Ohioans for Drug Price Relief Act (Slip Opinion), 2016 Ohio 5377 (Ohio 2016).
“So for legal authority, OMA turns to R.C. 3519.06, which provides: No initiative or referendum part-petition is properly verified if it appears on the face thereof, or is made to appear by satisfactory evidence: (A) That the statement required by section 3519.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.