Ohio Revised Code

Ohio Rev. Code § 4115.132 (2026)

Director of commerce - investigatory powers

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORCcodes.ohio.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

In any investigation undertaken by the director of commerce pursuant to sections 4115.03 to 4115.16 of the Revised Code, the director, a designated representative, or hearing examiner may administer oaths, take and cause to be taken depositions of witnesses, issue subpoenas, and compel the attendance of witnesses and the production of papers, books, accounts, payrolls, documents, records, and testimony relating to and relevant to the violation under investigation. In case of contumacy, failure, or refusal of any person, contractor, or subcontractor to obey the order, any court of common pleas having jurisdiction of the person, contractor, or subcontractor, upon application of the director or representative designated by the director shall have jurisdiction to issue to the person, contractor, or subcontractor an order requiring the person, contractor, or subcontractor to appear before the director or a representative designated by the director, to produce evidence as is ordered, and to give testimony relating to the matter under investigation or in question. Any failure to obey an order of the court may be punished by the court as a contempt thereof.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1989–1997 · leading case: Harris v. Stutzman, 536 N.E.2d 1154 (Ohio 1989).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Harris v. Stutzman, 536 N.E.2d 1154 (Ohio 1989). · cites it 8× “The issue presented is, for us, one of first impression: In an investigation undertaken by the Director of Industrial Relations pursuant to the prevailing wage laws, does R.C. 4115.132 authorize a designated representative of the director to issue a subpoena duces tecum to a…”
Ohio Asphalt Paving, Inc. v. Ohio Dep't of Indus. Relations, 589 N.E.2d 35 (Ohio 1992). “* * * ” R.C. 4115.132 states in pertinent part: “In any investigation undertaken by the director of industrial relations pursuant to sections 4115.”
State Ex Rel. Vaughn Indus., Inc. v. Ohio Bureau of Emp. Servs., 696 N.E.2d 294 (Ohio Ct. App. 1997). · cites it 2× “On or about June 15, 1995, and pursuant to R.C. 4115.132, the Ohio Department of Industrial Relations (“ODIR”), predecessor to the current administrative agency, OBES, issued three subpoenas duces tecum on Vaughn Industries, Inc.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.