Ohio Rev. Code » Chapter 4115
Ohio Revised Code

Ohio Rev. Code § 4115.99 (2026)

Penalty

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORCcodes.ohio.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(A) Whoever violates section 4115.08 or 4115.09 of the Revised Code shall be fined not less than twenty-five nor more than five hundred dollars.

(B) Whoever violates division (C) of section 4115.071, section 4115.10, or 4115.11 of the Revised Code is guilty of a misdemeanor of the second degree for a first offense; for each subsequent offense such person is guilty of a misdemeanor of the first degree.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1984–2021 · leading case: State v. Buckeye Elec. Co., 466 N.E.2d 894 (Ohio 1984).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Buckeye Elec. Co., 466 N.E.2d 894 (Ohio 1984). · cites it 9× “08, which empowers the prosecuting attorney to bring criminal actions, provides in part: “The prosecuting attorney may inquire into the commission of crimes within the county and shall prosecute, on behalf of the state, all complaints, suits, and controversies in which the state…”
Thomson v. Boss Excavating & Grading, Inc., 2021 Ohio 3743 (Ohio Ct. App. 2021). · cites it 4× “R.C. 4115.99. See Associated Builders at ¶ 15.”
State ex rel. Associated Builders & Contrs. of Cent. Ohio v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of Commrs., 2010 Ohio 1199 (Ohio 2010). · cites it 2× “R.C. 4115.99(B). III. Preemption Analysis 6 January Term, 2010 {¶ 16} In support of the proposition of law accepted by this court, appellants assert that the manner in which the board interpreted and applied its bid-evaluation criterion contained in Section 8.”
Ohio Rev. Code § 4115.99(A): 1 case
Thomson v. Boss Excavating & Grading, Inc., 2021 Ohio 3743 (Ohio Ct. App. 2021). “R.C. 4115.99. See Associated Builders at ¶ 15.”
Ohio Rev. Code § 4115.99(B): 3 cases
State v. Buckeye Elec. Co., 466 N.E.2d 894 (Ohio 1984). “08, which empowers the prosecuting attorney to bring criminal actions, provides in part: “The prosecuting attorney may inquire into the commission of crimes within the county and shall prosecute, on behalf of the state, all complaints, suits, and controversies in which the state…”
State ex rel. Associated Builders & Contrs. of Cent. Ohio v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of Commrs., 2010 Ohio 1199 (Ohio 2010). “R.C. 4115.99(B). III. Preemption Analysis 6 January Term, 2010 {¶ 16} In support of the proposition of law accepted by this court, appellants assert that the manner in which the board interpreted and applied its bid-evaluation criterion contained in Section 8.”
Thomson v. Boss Excavating & Grading, Inc., 2021 Ohio 3743 (Ohio Ct. App. 2021). “R.C. 4115.99. See Associated Builders at ¶ 15.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.