Ohio Revised Code

Ohio Rev. Code § 4123.511 (2026)

Notice of receipt of claim

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORCcodes.ohio.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(A) Within seven days after receipt of any claim under this chapter, the bureau of workers' compensation shall notify the claimant and the employer of the claimant of the receipt of the claim and of the facts alleged therein. If the bureau receives from a person other than the claimant written or facsimile information or information communicated verbally over the telephone indicating that an injury or occupational disease has occurred or been contracted which may be compensable under this chapter, the bureau shall notify the employee and the employer of the information. If the information is provided verbally over the telephone, the person providing the information shall provide written verification of the information to the bureau according to division (E) of section 4123.84 of the Revised Code. The receipt of the information in writing or facsimile, or if initially by telephone, the subsequent written verification, and the notice by the bureau shall be considered an application for compensation under section 4123.84 or 4123.85 of the Revised Code, provided that the conditions of division (E) of section 4123.84 of the Revised Code apply to information provided verbally over the telephone. Upon receipt of a claim, the bureau shall advise the claimant of the claim number assigned and the claimant's right to representation in the processing of a claim or to elect no representation. If the bureau determines that a claim is determined to be a compensable lost-time claim, the bureau shall notify the claimant and the employer of the availability of rehabilitation services. No bureau or industrial commission employee shall directly or indirectly convey any information in derogation of this right. This section shall in no way abrogate the bureau's responsibility to aid and assist a claimant in the filing of a claim and to advise the claimant of the claimant's rights under the law.

The administrator of workers' compensation shall assign all claims and investigations to the bureau service office from which investigation and determination may be made most expeditiously.

The bureau shall investigate the facts concerning an injury or occupational disease and ascertain such facts in whatever manner is most appropriate and may obtain statements in whatever manner is most appropriate from any of the following: employee; employer; attending physician, certified nurse-midwife, clinical nurse specialist, or certified nurse practitioner; and witnesses.

The administrator, with the advice and consent of the bureau of workers' compensation board of directors, may adopt rules that identify specified medical conditions that have a historical record of being allowed whenever included in a claim. The administrator may grant immediate allowance of any medical condition identified in those rules upon the filing of a claim involving that medical condition and may make immediate payment of medical bills for any medical condition identified in those rules that is included in a claim. If an employer contests the allowance of a claim involving any medical condition identified in those rules, and the claim is disallowed, payment for the medical condition included in that claim shall be charged to and paid from the surplus fund created under section 4123.34 of the Revised Code.

(B)(1) Except as provided in division (B)(2) of this section, in claims other than those in which the employer is a self-insuring employer, if the administrator determines under division (A) of this section that a claimant is or is not entitled to an award of compensation or benefits, the administrator shall issue an order no later than twenty-eight days after the sending of the notice under division (A) of this section, granting or denying the payment of the compensation or benefits, or both as is appropriate to the claimant. Notwithstanding the time limitation specified in this division for the issuance of an order, if a medical examination of the claimant is required by statute, the administrator promptly shall schedule the claimant for that examination and shall issue an order no later than twenty-eight days after receipt of the report of the examination. The administrator shall notify the claimant and the employer of the claimant and their respective representatives in writing of the nature of the order and the amounts of compensation and benefit payments involved. The employer or claimant may appeal the order pursuant to division (C) of this section within fourteen days after the date of the receipt of the order. The employer and claimant may waive, in writing, their rights to an appeal under this division.

(2) Notwithstanding the time limitation specified in division (B)(1) of this section for the issuance of an order, if the employer certifies a claim for payment of compensation or benefits, or both, to a claimant, and the administrator has completed the investigation of the claim, the payment of benefits or compensation, or both, as is appropriate, shall commence upon the later of the date of the certification or completion of the investigation and issuance of the order by the administrator, provided that the administrator shall issue the order no later than the time limitation specified in division (B)(1) of this section.

(3) If an appeal is made under division (B)(1) or (2) of this section, the administrator shall forward the claim file to the appropriate district hearing officer within seven days of the appeal. In contested claims other than state fund claims, the administrator shall forward the claim within seven days of the administrator's receipt of the claim to the industrial commission, which shall refer the claim to an appropriate district hearing officer for a hearing in accordance with division (C) of this section.

(C) If an employer or claimant timely appeals the order of the administrator issued under division (B) of this section or in the case of other contested claims other than state fund claims, the commission shall refer the claim to an appropriate district hearing officer according to rules the commission adopts under section 4121.36 of the Revised Code. The district hearing officer shall notify the parties and their respective representatives of the time and place of the hearing.

The district hearing officer shall hold a hearing on a disputed issue or claim within forty-five days after the filing of the appeal under this division and issue a decision within seven days after holding the hearing. The district hearing officer shall notify the parties and their respective representatives in writing of the order. Any party may appeal an order issued under this division pursuant to division (D) of this section within fourteen days after receipt of the order under this division.

(D) Upon the timely filing of an appeal of the order of the district hearing officer issued under division (C) of this section, the commission shall refer the claim file to an appropriate staff hearing officer according to its rules adopted under section 4121.36 of the Revised Code. The staff hearing officer shall hold a hearing within forty-five days after the filing of an appeal under this division and issue a decision within seven days after holding the hearing under this division. The staff hearing officer shall notify the parties and their respective representatives in writing of the staff hearing officer's order. Any party may appeal an order issued under this division pursuant to division (E) of this section within fourteen days after receipt of the order under this division.

(E) Upon the filing of a timely appeal of the order of the staff hearing officer issued under division (D) of this section, the commission or a designated staff hearing officer, on behalf of the commission, shall determine whether the commission will hear the appeal. If the commission or the designated staff hearing officer decides to hear the appeal, the commission or the designated staff hearing officer shall notify the parties and their respective representatives in writing of the time and place of the hearing. The commission shall hold the hearing within forty-five days after the filing of the notice of appeal and, within seven days after the conclusion of the hearing, the commission shall issue its order affirming, modifying, or reversing the order issued under division (D) of this section. The commission shall notify the parties and their respective representatives in writing of the order. If the commission or the designated staff hearing officer determines not to hear the appeal, within fourteen days after the expiration of the period in which an appeal of the order of the staff hearing officer may be filed as provided in division (D) of this section, the commission or the designated staff hearing officer shall issue an order to that effect and notify the parties and their respective representatives in writing of that order.

Except as otherwise provided in this chapter and Chapters 4121., 4127., and 4131. of the Revised Code, any party may appeal an order issued under this division to the court pursuant to section 4123.512 of the Revised Code within sixty days after receipt of the order, subject to the limitations contained in that section.

(F) Every notice of an appeal from an order issued under divisions (B), (C), (D), and (E) of this section shall state the names of the claimant and employer, the number of the claim, the date of the decision appealed from, and the fact that the appellant appeals therefrom.

(G) All of the following apply to the proceedings under divisions (C), (D), and (E) of this section:

(1) The parties shall proceed promptly and without continuances except for good cause;

(2) The parties, in good faith, shall engage in the free exchange of information relevant to the claim prior to the conduct of a hearing according to the rules the commission adopts under section 4121.36 of the Revised Code;

(3) The administrator is a party and may appear and participate at all administrative proceedings on behalf of the state insurance fund. However, in cases in which the employer is represented, the administrator shall neither present arguments nor introduce testimony that is cumulative to that presented or introduced by the employer or the employer's representative. The administrator may file an appeal under this section on behalf of the state insurance fund; however, except in cases arising under section 4123.343 of the Revised Code, the administrator only may appeal questions of law or issues of fraud when the employer appears in person or by representative.

(H) Except as provided in section 4121.63 of the Revised Code and division (K) of this section, payments of compensation to a claimant or on behalf of a claimant as a result of any order issued under this chapter shall commence upon the earlier of the following:

(1) Fourteen days after the date the administrator issues an order under division (B) of this section, unless that order is appealed;

(2) The date when the employer has waived the right to appeal a decision issued under division (B) of this section;

(3) If no appeal of an order has been filed under this section or to a court under section 4123.512 of the Revised Code, the expiration of the time limitations for the filing of an appeal of an order;

(4) The date of receipt by the employer of an order of a district hearing officer, a staff hearing officer, or the industrial commission issued under division (C), (D), or (E) of this section.

(I) Except as otherwise provided in division (B) of section 4123.66 of the Revised Code, payments of medical benefits payable under this chapter or Chapter 4121., 4127., or 4131. of the Revised Code shall commence upon the earlier of the following:

(1) The date of the issuance of the staff hearing officer's order under division (D) of this section;

(2) The date of the final administrative or judicial determination.

(J) The administrator shall charge the compensation payments made in accordance with division (H) of this section or medical benefits payments made in accordance with division (I) of this section to an employer's experience immediately after the employer has exhausted the employer's administrative appeals as provided in this section or has waived the employer's right to an administrative appeal under division (B) of this section, subject to the adjustment specified in division (H) of section 4123.512 of the Revised Code.

(K) Upon the final administrative or judicial determination under this section or section 4123.512 of the Revised Code of an appeal of an order to pay compensation, if a claimant is found to have received compensation pursuant to a prior order which is reversed upon subsequent appeal, the claimant's employer, if a self-insuring employer, or the bureau, shall withhold from any amount to which the claimant becomes entitled pursuant to any claim, past, present, or future, under Chapter 4121., 4123., 4127., or 4131. of the Revised Code, the amount of previously paid compensation to the claimant which, due to reversal upon appeal, the claimant is not entitled, pursuant to the following criteria:

(1) No withholding for the first twelve weeks of temporary total disability compensation pursuant to section 4123.56 of the Revised Code shall be made;

(2) Forty per cent of all awards of compensation paid pursuant to sections 4123.56 and 4123.57 of the Revised Code, until the amount overpaid is refunded;

(3) Twenty-five per cent of any compensation paid pursuant to section 4123.58 of the Revised Code until the amount overpaid is refunded;

(4) If, pursuant to an appeal under section 4123.512 of the Revised Code, the court of appeals or the supreme court reverses the allowance of the claim, then no amount of any compensation will be withheld.

The administrator and self-insuring employers, as appropriate, are subject to the repayment schedule of this division only with respect to an order to pay compensation that was properly paid under a previous order, but which is subsequently reversed upon an administrative or judicial appeal. The administrator and self-insuring employers are not subject to, but may utilize, the repayment schedule of this division, or any other lawful means, to collect payment of compensation made to a person who was not entitled to the compensation due to fraud as determined by the administrator or the industrial commission.

(L) If a staff hearing officer or the commission fails to issue a decision or the commission fails to refuse to hear an appeal within the time periods required by this section, payments to a claimant shall cease until the staff hearing officer or commission issues a decision or hears the appeal, unless the failure was due to the fault or neglect of the employer or the employer agrees that the payments should continue for a longer period of time.

(M) Except as otherwise provided in this section or section 4123.522 of the Revised Code, no appeal is timely filed under this section unless the appeal is filed with the time limits set forth in this section.

(N) No person who is not an employee of the bureau or commission or who is not by law given access to the contents of a claims file shall have a file in the person's possession.

(O) Upon application of a party who resides in an area in which an emergency or disaster is declared, the industrial commission and hearing officers of the commission may waive the time frame within which claims and appeals of claims set forth in this section must be filed upon a finding that the applicant was unable to comply with a filing deadline due to an emergency or a disaster.

As used in this division:

(1) "Emergency" means any occasion or instance for which the governor of Ohio or the president of the United States publicly declares an emergency and orders state or federal assistance to save lives and protect property, the public health and safety, or to lessen or avert the threat of a catastrophe.

(2) "Disaster" means any natural catastrophe or fire, flood, or explosion, regardless of the cause, that causes damage of sufficient magnitude that the governor of Ohio or the president of the United States, through a public declaration, orders state or federal assistance to alleviate damage, loss, hardship, or suffering that results from the occurrence.

Last updated February 18, 2025 at 6:07 PM

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 170 cases (22 in the last 5 years), 1960–2026 · leading case: State Ex Rel. Crabtree v. Bureau of Workers' Comp., 1994 Ohio 474 (Ohio 1994).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State Ex Rel. Crabtree v. Bureau of Workers' Comp., 1994 Ohio 474 (Ohio 1994). · cites it 18× “The bureau argues that R.C. 4123.511, read in pari materia with R.”
State ex rel. Liposchak v. Indus. Comm'n, 737 N.E.2d 519 (Ohio 2000). · cites it 13× “60 provides: “An order issued by the administrator under this section is appealable pursuant to section 4123.511 of the Revised Code [administrative appeal to the commission] but is not appealable to court under section 4123.”
Daniel v. Williams, 2014 Ohio 273 (Ohio Ct. App. 2014). · cites it 13× “The decision was narrowly guided by R.C. 4123.511, which directed [Daniel] to exhaust all administrative remedies before appealing the BWC's order.”
State ex rel. Russell v. Indus. Comm'n, 696 N.E.2d 1069 (Ohio 1998). · cites it 11× “Code 4121-3-32 and R.C. 4123.511(J) which specifically provide for withholding against future awards.”
State ex rel. Liposchak v. Indus. Comm., 2000 Ohio 73 (Ohio 2000). · cites it 13× “60 are appealable under R.C. 4123.511. R.C. 4123.60. R.C. 4123.511 would, then, permit an appeal of the administrator’s order to the district hearing officer (Division [C]), the staff hearing officer (Division [D]), and, finally, the commission (Division [E]).”
Starkey v. Builders FirstSource Ohio Valley, L.L.C., 2011 Ohio 3278 (Ohio 2011). · cites it 8× “We explained that the Workers’ Compensation Act provides the Industrial Commission with the exclusive authority to perform an initial review of claims pursuant to R.C. 4123.511 and also affords the common pleas court a limited right to conduct a de novo review of those claims…”
Caldwell v. Whirlpool Corp., 2024 Ohio 1625 (Ohio 2024). · cites it 10× “The administrative process for workers’ compensation claims {¶ 16} First we look at R.C. 4123.511, which outlines the administrative procedure for workers’ compensation claims.”
Bennett v. Admr., Ohio Bureau of Workers' Comp., 2012 Ohio 5639 (Ohio 2012). · cites it 4× “may appeal an order of the industrial commission made under division (B) of section 4123.511 of the Revised Code in any injury or occupation disease case, other than a decision as to the extent of disability to the court of common pleas[.”
State ex rel. Belle Tire Distribs., Inc. v. Indus. Comm. (Slip Opinion), 2018 Ohio 2122 (Ohio 2018). · cites it 2× “But our caselaw—even the case relied upon by the majority—compels a result opposite that reached by the majority. Appeal of the decision is available under R.”
Arth Brass & Aluminum Castings, Inc. v. Conrad, 820 N.E.2d 900 (Ohio 2004). · cites it 11× “Since the question in this case concerns when the bureau may begin to make medical-benefit payments (as addressed in R.C. 4123.511[I]), and not whether the bureau should have paid any interest on late payments (as addressed in R.”
Ward v. Kroger Co., 106 Ohio St. 3d 35 (Ohio 2005). · cites it 4× “pational disease case, other than a decision as to the extent of disability to the court of common pleas * * To this extent, the statute clearly contemplates the general nonappealability of commission orders and, in the ease of claims for initial allowance, withholding judicial…”
Ohio v. Foster (In Re Foster), 280 B.R. 193 (Bankr. S.D. Ohio 2002). · cites it 6× “Ohio Rev.Code Ann. § 4123.511(J)(4) ( Anderson 2001 ).”
Show all 170 citing cases →
— Ohio Rev. Code § 4123.511(1) — 1 case
Arth Brass & Aluminum Castings, Inc. v. Conrad, 820 N.E.2d 900 (Ohio 2004). “Since the question in this case concerns when the bureau may begin to make medical-benefit payments (as addressed in R.C. 4123.511[I]), and not whether the bureau should have paid any interest on late payments (as addressed in R.”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 4123.511(A) — 4 cases
State Ex Rel. Crabtree v. Bureau of Workers' Comp., 1994 Ohio 474 (Ohio 1994). “The bureau argues that R.C. 4123.511, read in pari materia with R.”
Anders v. Powertrain Div., Gen. Motors Corp., 813 N.E.2d 923 (Ohio Ct. App. 2004).
King v. Repub. Steel, 2021 Ohio 861 (Ohio Ct. App. 2021).
Foster v. Akro Corp., 742 N.E.2d 1195 (Ohio Ct. App. 2000).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 4123.511(B) — 5 cases
Spencer v. Freight Handlers, Inc., 2012 Ohio 880 (Ohio 2012).
State Ex Rel. Crabtree v. Bureau of Workers' Comp., 1994 Ohio 474 (Ohio 1994). “The bureau argues that R.C. 4123.511, read in pari materia with R.”
Brinker v. Frontier North, Inc., 2016 Ohio 8279 (Ohio Ct. App. 2016).
Ohio Bur. of Workers' Comp. v. Verlinger, 2016 Ohio 8029 (Ohio Ct. App. 2016).
Soltis v. Comfort Keepers, 2022 Ohio 1672 (Ohio Ct. App. 2022).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 4123.511(B)(1) — 10 cases
Daniel v. Williams, 2014 Ohio 273 (Ohio Ct. App. 2014). “The decision was narrowly guided by R.C. 4123.511, which directed [Daniel] to exhaust all administrative remedies before appealing the BWC's order.”
Cooper v. City of Dayton, 696 N.E.2d 640 (Ohio Ct. App. 1997).
Anders v. Powertrain Div., Gen. Motors Corp., 813 N.E.2d 923 (Ohio Ct. App. 2004).
Wein v. Seaman Corp., 687 N.E.2d 477 (Ohio Ct. App. 1996).
Brinker v. Frontier North, Inc., 2016 Ohio 8279 (Ohio Ct. App. 2016).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 4123.511(B)(3) — 3 cases
Anders v. Powertrain Div., Gen. Motors Corp., 813 N.E.2d 923 (Ohio Ct. App. 2004).
State ex rel. Tchankpa v. Indus. Comm., 2024 Ohio 93 (Ohio Ct. App. 2024).
State ex rel. Omni Manor, Inc. v. Indus. Comm. (Slip Opinion), 2020 Ohio 4422 (Ohio 2020).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 4123.511(C) — 10 cases
State ex rel. BF Goodrich Co., Specialty Chems. Div. v. Indus. Comm. (Slip Opinion), 2016 Ohio 7988 (Ohio 2016).
State Ex Rel. Sugardale Foods, Inc. v. Indus. Comm'n, 2000 Ohio 185 (Ohio 2000).
State ex rel. Tchankpa v. Indus. Comm., 2024 Ohio 93 (Ohio Ct. App. 2024).
Anders v. Powertrain Div., Gen. Motors Corp., 813 N.E.2d 923 (Ohio Ct. App. 2004).
State ex rel. Sugardale Foods, Inc. v. Indus. Comm., 2000 Ohio 185 (Ohio 2000).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 4123.511(D) — 13 cases
State ex rel. Tchankpa v. Indus. Comm., 2024 Ohio 93 (Ohio Ct. App. 2024).
State ex rel. Tchankpa v. Indus. Comm., 2024 Ohio 3430 (Ohio 2024).
State Ex Rel. Frank W. Schaefer, Inc. v. Indus. Comm'n, 1998 Ohio 324 (Ohio 1998).
Arth Brass & Aluminum Castings, Inc. v. Conrad, 820 N.E.2d 900 (Ohio 2004). “Since the question in this case concerns when the bureau may begin to make medical-benefit payments (as addressed in R.C. 4123.511[I]), and not whether the bureau should have paid any interest on late payments (as addressed in R.”
State ex rel. Dunlap v. Indus. Comm., 2016 Ohio 8131 (Ohio Ct. App. 2016).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 4123.511(E) — 31 cases
State ex rel. Belle Tire Distribs., Inc. v. Indus. Comm. (Slip Opinion), 2018 Ohio 2122 (Ohio 2018). “But our caselaw—even the case relied upon by the majority—compels a result opposite that reached by the majority. Appeal of the decision is available under R.”
Bennett v. Admr., Ohio Bureau of Workers' Comp., 2012 Ohio 5639 (Ohio 2012). “may appeal an order of the industrial commission made under division (B) of section 4123.511 of the Revised Code in any injury or occupation disease case, other than a decision as to the extent of disability to the court of common pleas[.”
Caldwell v. Whirlpool Corp., 2024 Ohio 1625 (Ohio 2024). “The administrative process for workers’ compensation claims {¶ 16} First we look at R.C. 4123.511, which outlines the administrative procedure for workers’ compensation claims.”
State ex rel. Dunlap v. Indus. Comm., 2016 Ohio 8131 (Ohio Ct. App. 2016).
State ex rel. Ohio AFL-CIO v. Voinovich, 631 N.E.2d 582 (Ohio 1994).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 4123.511(F) — 9 cases
Kaiser v. Ameritemps, Inc., 84 Ohio St. 3d 411 (Ohio 1999).
State ex rel. Alhamarshah v. Indus. Comm'n, 33 N.E.3d 43 (Ohio 2015).
State ex rel. Lapp Roofing & Sheet Metal Co. v. Indus. Comm'n, 882 N.E.2d 911 (Ohio 2008).
State ex rel. Belle Tire Distribs, Inc. v. Indus. Comm., 2016 Ohio 7869 (Ohio Ct. App. 2016).
State ex rel. Black v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc., 2015 Ohio 4868 (Ohio Ct. App. 2015).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 4123.511(G)(1) — 1 case
State ex rel. Tchankpa v. Indus. Comm., 2024 Ohio 3430 (Ohio 2024).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 4123.511(H) — 4 cases
Arth Brass & Aluminum Castings, Inc. v. Conrad, 820 N.E.2d 900 (Ohio 2004). “Since the question in this case concerns when the bureau may begin to make medical-benefit payments (as addressed in R.C. 4123.511[I]), and not whether the bureau should have paid any interest on late payments (as addressed in R.”
State ex rel. Tchankpa v. Indus. Comm., 2024 Ohio 93 (Ohio Ct. App. 2024).
State ex rel. Sysco Food Servs. of Cleveland, Inc. v. Indus. Comm'n, 734 N.E.2d 361 (Ohio 2000).
State ex rel. Sysco Food Serv. of Cleveland, Inc. v. Indus. Comm., 2000 Ohio 1 (Ohio 2000).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 4123.511(H)(4) — 2 cases
Haffner v. Conrad, 702 N.E.2d 160 (Ohio Ct. App. 1997).
State ex rel. Tchankpa v. Indus. Comm., 2024 Ohio 3430 (Ohio 2024).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 4123.511(I) — 3 cases
Tchankpa v. Ascena Retail Grp.. Inc., 2020 Ohio 3291 (Ohio Ct. App. 2020).
State ex rel. Tchankpa v. Indus. Comm., 2024 Ohio 3430 (Ohio 2024).
State ex rel. Tchankpa v. Indus. Comm., 2024 Ohio 93 (Ohio Ct. App. 2024).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 4123.511(I)(1) — 1 case
Arth Brass & Aluminum Castings, Inc. v. Conrad, 820 N.E.2d 900 (Ohio 2004). “Since the question in this case concerns when the bureau may begin to make medical-benefit payments (as addressed in R.C. 4123.511[I]), and not whether the bureau should have paid any interest on late payments (as addressed in R.”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 4123.511(J) — 39 cases
State ex rel. Russell v. Indus. Comm'n, 696 N.E.2d 1069 (Ohio 1998). “Code 4121-3-32 and R.C. 4123.511(J) which specifically provide for withholding against future awards.”
Ferguson v. State (Slip Opinion), 2017 Ohio 7844 (Ohio 2017).
Holeton v. Crouse Cartage Co., 748 N.E.2d 1111 (Ohio 2001).
State ex rel. Alesci v. Indus. Comm'n, 777 N.E.2d 835 (Ohio 2002).
State ex rel. Russell v. Indus. Comm., 1998 Ohio 212 (Ohio 1998).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 4123.511(J)(4) — 2 cases
Ohio v. Foster (In Re Foster), 280 B.R. 193 (Bankr. S.D. Ohio 2002). “Ohio Rev.Code Ann. § 4123.511(J)(4) ( Anderson 2001 ).”
Schultz v. Ohio Bureau of Workers' Comp., 772 N.E.2d 1253 (Ohio Ct. App. 2002).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 4123.511(K) — 22 cases
Ferguson v. State (Slip Opinion), 2017 Ohio 7844 (Ohio 2017).
State ex rel. Dunlap v. Indus. Comm., 2016 Ohio 8131 (Ohio Ct. App. 2016).
State ex rel. Dillon v. Indus. Comm., 2024 Ohio 744 (Ohio 2024).
State ex rel. Dillon v. Indus. Comm., 2022 Ohio 4773 (Ohio Ct. App. 2022).
State ex rel. Kurtz v. Indus. Comm., 2026 Ohio 824 (Ohio Ct. App. 2026).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 4123.511(K)(4) — 3 cases
State ex rel. Baker v. Indus. Comm., 2013 Ohio 5697 (Ohio Ct. App. 2013).
State ex rel. Pleasant v. Indus. Comm., 2017 Ohio 7130 (Ohio Ct. App. 2017).
State ex rel. Newsome v. Indus. Comm., 2014 Ohio 1643 (Ohio Ct. App. 2014).
— Ohio Rev. Code § 4123.511(L) — 1 case
Wein v. Seaman Corp., 687 N.E.2d 477 (Ohio Ct. App. 1996).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.