In case an injury to or an occupational disease contracted by an employee causes the employee's death, benefits shall be in the amount and to the persons following:
(A) If there are no dependents, the disbursements from the state insurance fund is limited to the expenses provided for in section 4123.66 of the Revised Code.
(B) If there are wholly dependent persons at the time of the death, the weekly payment is sixty-six and two-thirds per cent of the average weekly wage, but not to exceed a maximum aggregate amount of weekly compensation which is equal to sixty-six and two-thirds per cent of the statewide average weekly wage as defined in division (C) of section 4123.62 of the Revised Code, and not in any event less than a minimum amount of weekly compensation which is equal to fifty per cent of the statewide average weekly wage as defined in division (C) of section 4123.62 of the Revised Code, regardless of the average weekly wage; provided however, that if the death is due to injury received or occupational disease first diagnosed after January 1, 1976, the weekly payment is sixty-six and two-thirds per cent of the average weekly wage but not to exceed a maximum aggregate amount of weekly compensation which is equal to the statewide average weekly wage as defined in division (C) of section 4123.62 of the Revised Code; provided that when any claimant is receiving total disability compensation at the time of death the wholly dependent person is eligible for the maximum compensation provided for in this section. Where there is more than one person who is wholly dependent at the time of the death of the employee, the administrator of workers' compensation shall promptly apportion the weekly amount of compensation payable under this section among the dependent persons as provided in division (D) of this section.
(1) The payment as provided in this section shall continue from the date of death of an injured or disabled employee until the death or remarriage of such dependent spouse. If the dependent spouse remarries, an amount equal to two years of compensation benefits at the weekly amount determined to be applicable to and being paid to the dependent spouse shall be paid in a lump sum to such spouse and no further compensation shall be paid to such spouse.
(2) That portion of the payment provided in division (B) of this section applicable to wholly dependent persons other than a spouse shall continue from the date of death of an injured or disabled employee to a dependent as of the date of death, other than a spouse, at the weekly amount determined to be applicable and being paid to such dependent other than a spouse, until the dependent:
(a) Reaches eighteen years of age;
(b) If pursuing a full time educational program while enrolled in an accredited educational institution and program, reaches twenty-five years of age;
(c) If mentally or physically incapacitated from having any earnings, is no longer so incapacitated.
(3)(a) Payments under division (B) of this section to a dependent described in division (B)(2)(c) of this section shall not be terminated due to the dependent's employment in a sheltered workshop if the dependent does not receive income, compensation, or remuneration from that employment in excess of two thousand dollars in any calendar quarter.
(b) As used in division (B)(3) of this section, "sheltered workshop" has the same meaning as in section 4123.58 of the Revised Code.
(C) If there are partly dependent persons at the time of the death the weekly payment is sixty-six and two-thirds per cent of the employee's average weekly wage, not to exceed sixty-six and two-thirds per cent of the statewide average weekly wage as defined in division (C) of section 4123.62 of the Revised Code, and shall continue for such time as the administrator in each case determines.
(D) The following persons are presumed to be wholly dependent for their support upon a deceased employee:
(1) A surviving spouse who was living with the employee at the time of death or a surviving spouse who was separated from the employee at the time of death because of the aggression of the employee;
(2) A child under the age of eighteen years, or twenty-five years if pursuing a full-time educational program while enrolled in an accredited educational institution and program, or over said age if physically or mentally incapacitated from earning, upon only the one parent who is contributing more than one-half of the support for such child and with whom the child is living at the time of the death of such parent, or for whose maintenance such parent was legally liable at the time of the parent's death.
It is presumed that there is sufficient dependency to entitle a surviving natural parent or surviving natural parents, share and share alike, with whom the decedent was living at the time of the decedent's death, to a total minimum award of three thousand dollars.
The administrator may take into consideration any circumstances which, at the time of the death of the decedent, clearly indicate prospective dependency on the part of the claimant and potential support on the part of the decedent. No person shall be considered a prospective dependent unless such person is a member of the family of the deceased employee and bears to the deceased employee the relation of surviving spouse, lineal descendant, ancestor, or brother or sister. The total award for any or all prospective dependency to all such claimants, except to a natural parent or natural parents of the deceased, shall not exceed three thousand dollars to be apportioned among them as the administrator orders.
In all other cases, the question of dependency, in whole or in part, shall be determined in accordance with the facts in each particular case existing at the time of the injury resulting in the death of such employee, but no person shall be considered as dependent unless such person is a member of the family of the deceased employee, or bears to the deceased employee the relation of surviving spouse, lineal descendant, ancestor, or brother or sister.
(E) An order issued by the administrator under this section is appealable pursuant to sections 4123.511 to 4123.512 of the Revised Code.
State ex rel. Liposchak v. Indus. Comm'n, 737 N.E.2d 519 (Ohio 2000). · cites it 22דThe task is even more difficult in this appeal because (1) Edith’s estate has not argued in favor of her R.C. 4123.59 death benefit claim, 3 and (2) R.”
Liposchak v. Adm'r, Bureau of Workers' Comp., 741 N.E.2d 537 (Ohio Ct. App. 2000). · cites it 46דEdith, pursuant to R.C. 4123.59, filed a C-2 “First Notice of Death & Preliminary Application,” requesting death benefits as a dependent of Robert Liposchak, and payment of funeral and medical expenses.”
State ex rel. Nyitray v. Indus. Comm'n, 443 N.E.2d 962 (Ohio 1983). · cites it 21דThe second type of compensation available to dependents is death benefits under R.C. 4123.59. In this case, death benefits, as well as permanent partial disability compensation, were awarded appellant.”
State ex rel. Liposchak v. Indus. Comm., 2000 Ohio 73 (Ohio 2000). · cites it 28ד] Workers’ compensation—Although death benefits may be granted or denied based on dependent status as defined in R.C. 4123.59, the denial or grant of benefits is not appealable unless it concerns the causal connection between injury, disease, or death and employment—R.”
State Ex Rel. Patterson v. Indus. Comm'n, 1996 Ohio 263 (Ohio 1996). · cites it 20ד13 does not specifically exclude R.C. 4123.59 from applying to R.C. Chapter 4127, the General Assembly intended that R.”
State ex rel. Doersam v. Indus. Comm'n, 543 N.E.2d 1169 (Ohio 1989). · cites it 15דended, several things can be gleaned: (1) For any persons to be eligible at all to receive benefits pursuant to the section, the death of the decedent worker must be related to and caused by his industrial injury or occupational disease; (2) for any person or persons to be…”
State ex rel. McDonald v. Indus. Comm., 2023 Ohio 1620 (Ohio 2023). · cites it 24ד” 2 January Term, 2023 {¶ 3} R.C. 4123.59 provides that workers’ compensation death benefits are payable to persons who were dependent for their support—in whole or in part—on a deceased employee.”
Emmons v. Keller, 254 N.E.2d 687 (Ohio 1970). · cites it 32דEffective October 1, 1963 (130 Ohio Laws 937, 1466), Section 4123.59, Revised Code, was amended to read, so far as pertinent: “In case an injury to or an occupational disease contracted by an employee causes his death, and if (1) his death ensues, within a period of three years…”
State v. Noling (Slip Opinion), 2016 Ohio 8252 (Ohio 2016). · cites it 4דIn Doersam, the court held that an amendment to R.C. 4123.59(B) violated equal protection by creating two classes of claimants who may receive workers’ compensation death benefits and providing greater benefits “ ‘if the death is due to injury received or occupational disease…”
Holeton v. Crouse Cartage Co., 748 N.E.2d 1111 (Ohio 2001). · cites it 4דHis surviving spouse, appellant RaShell Ross, and two minor children, Joshua and James Ross, filed an application for death benefits pursuant to R.C. 4123.59. Wendy’s, a self-insured employer, certified the claim and began paying death benefits at a rate of $493 per week.”
White v. Conrad, 102 Ohio St. 3d 125 (Ohio 2004). · cites it 8דLaw and Analysis {¶ 6} R.C. 4123.59 provides that if an injury causes an employee’s death, benefits will be paid to persons wholly dependent on the employee at the time.”
State ex rel. Tradesmen Internatl., L.L.C. v. Indus. Comm., 2022 Ohio 2935 (Ohio Ct. App. 2022). · cites it 13ד59, the statute governing worker's compensation death benefits, provides in pertinent part: (C) If there are partly dependent persons at the time of the death the weekly payment is sixty-six and two-thirds per cent of the employee's average weekly wage, not to exceed sixty-six…”
State Ex Rel. Patterson v. Indus. Comm'n, 1996 Ohio 263 (Ohio 1996). “13 does not specifically exclude R.C. 4123.59 from applying to R.C. Chapter 4127, the General Assembly intended that R.”
State ex rel. Doersam v. Indus. Comm'n, 543 N.E.2d 1169 (Ohio 1989). “ended, several things can be gleaned: (1) For any persons to be eligible at all to receive benefits pursuant to the section, the death of the decedent worker must be related to and caused by his industrial injury or occupational disease; (2) for any person or persons to be…”
State v. Noling (Slip Opinion), 2016 Ohio 8252 (Ohio 2016). “In Doersam, the court held that an amendment to R.C. 4123.59(B) violated equal protection by creating two classes of claimants who may receive workers’ compensation death benefits and providing greater benefits “ ‘if the death is due to injury received or occupational disease…”
Holeton v. Crouse Cartage Co., 748 N.E.2d 1111 (Ohio 2001). “His surviving spouse, appellant RaShell Ross, and two minor children, Joshua and James Ross, filed an application for death benefits pursuant to R.C. 4123.59. Wendy’s, a self-insured employer, certified the claim and began paying death benefits at a rate of $493 per week.”
Liposchak v. Adm'r, Bureau of Workers' Comp., 741 N.E.2d 537 (Ohio Ct. App. 2000). “Edith, pursuant to R.C. 4123.59, filed a C-2 “First Notice of Death & Preliminary Application,” requesting death benefits as a dependent of Robert Liposchak, and payment of funeral and medical expenses.”
Holeton v. Crouse Cartage Co., 748 N.E.2d 1111 (Ohio 2001). “His surviving spouse, appellant RaShell Ross, and two minor children, Joshua and James Ross, filed an application for death benefits pursuant to R.C. 4123.59. Wendy’s, a self-insured employer, certified the claim and began paying death benefits at a rate of $493 per week.”
White v. Conrad, 102 Ohio St. 3d 125 (Ohio 2004). “Law and Analysis {¶ 6} R.C. 4123.59 provides that if an injury causes an employee’s death, benefits will be paid to persons wholly dependent on the employee at the time.”
State ex rel. Tradesmen Internatl., L.L.C. v. Indus. Comm., 2022 Ohio 2935 (Ohio Ct. App. 2022). “59, the statute governing worker's compensation death benefits, provides in pertinent part: (C) If there are partly dependent persons at the time of the death the weekly payment is sixty-six and two-thirds per cent of the employee's average weekly wage, not to exceed sixty-six…”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 4123.59(C) — 7 cases
State ex rel. Tradesmen Internatl., L.L.C. v. Indus. Comm., 2022 Ohio 2935 (Ohio Ct. App. 2022). “59, the statute governing worker's compensation death benefits, provides in pertinent part: (C) If there are partly dependent persons at the time of the death the weekly payment is sixty-six and two-thirds per cent of the employee's average weekly wage, not to exceed sixty-six…”
State ex rel. Liposchak v. Indus. Comm'n, 737 N.E.2d 519 (Ohio 2000). “The task is even more difficult in this appeal because (1) Edith’s estate has not argued in favor of her R.C. 4123.59 death benefit claim, 3 and (2) R.”
State ex rel. Liposchak v. Indus. Comm., 2000 Ohio 73 (Ohio 2000). “] Workers’ compensation—Although death benefits may be granted or denied based on dependent status as defined in R.C. 4123.59, the denial or grant of benefits is not appealable unless it concerns the causal connection between injury, disease, or death and employment—R.”
Liposchak v. Adm'r, Bureau of Workers' Comp., 741 N.E.2d 537 (Ohio Ct. App. 2000). “Edith, pursuant to R.C. 4123.59, filed a C-2 “First Notice of Death & Preliminary Application,” requesting death benefits as a dependent of Robert Liposchak, and payment of funeral and medical expenses.”
State ex rel. McDonald v. Indus. Comm., 2023 Ohio 1620 (Ohio 2023). “” 2 January Term, 2023 {¶ 3} R.C. 4123.59 provides that workers’ compensation death benefits are payable to persons who were dependent for their support—in whole or in part—on a deceased employee.”
Liposchak v. Adm'r, Bureau of Workers' Comp., 741 N.E.2d 537 (Ohio Ct. App. 2000). “Edith, pursuant to R.C. 4123.59, filed a C-2 “First Notice of Death & Preliminary Application,” requesting death benefits as a dependent of Robert Liposchak, and payment of funeral and medical expenses.”
State ex rel. Tradesmen Internatl., L.L.C. v. Indus. Comm., 2022 Ohio 2935 (Ohio Ct. App. 2022). “59, the statute governing worker's compensation death benefits, provides in pertinent part: (C) If there are partly dependent persons at the time of the death the weekly payment is sixty-six and two-thirds per cent of the employee's average weekly wage, not to exceed sixty-six…”
White v. Conrad, 102 Ohio St. 3d 125 (Ohio 2004). “Law and Analysis {¶ 6} R.C. 4123.59 provides that if an injury causes an employee’s death, benefits will be paid to persons wholly dependent on the employee at the time.”
State ex rel. McDonald v. Indus. Comm., 2023 Ohio 1620 (Ohio 2023). “” 2 January Term, 2023 {¶ 3} R.C. 4123.59 provides that workers’ compensation death benefits are payable to persons who were dependent for their support—in whole or in part—on a deceased employee.”
Liposchak v. Adm'r, Bureau of Workers' Comp., 741 N.E.2d 537 (Ohio Ct. App. 2000). “Edith, pursuant to R.C. 4123.59, filed a C-2 “First Notice of Death & Preliminary Application,” requesting death benefits as a dependent of Robert Liposchak, and payment of funeral and medical expenses.”
State ex rel. McDonald v. Indus. Comm., 2023 Ohio 1620 (Ohio 2023). “” 2 January Term, 2023 {¶ 3} R.C. 4123.59 provides that workers’ compensation death benefits are payable to persons who were dependent for their support—in whole or in part—on a deceased employee.”
State ex rel. Liposchak v. Indus. Comm'n, 737 N.E.2d 519 (Ohio 2000). “The task is even more difficult in this appeal because (1) Edith’s estate has not argued in favor of her R.C. 4123.59 death benefit claim, 3 and (2) R.”
White v. Conrad, 102 Ohio St. 3d 125 (Ohio 2004). “Law and Analysis {¶ 6} R.C. 4123.59 provides that if an injury causes an employee’s death, benefits will be paid to persons wholly dependent on the employee at the time.”
State ex rel. Liposchak v. Indus. Comm., 2000 Ohio 73 (Ohio 2000). “] Workers’ compensation—Although death benefits may be granted or denied based on dependent status as defined in R.C. 4123.59, the denial or grant of benefits is not appealable unless it concerns the causal connection between injury, disease, or death and employment—R.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.