Except as permitted by Chapter 4141. of the Revised Code:
(A) No agreement by an employee to waive his right to benefits is valid, nor shall benefits be assigned, released, or commuted; and
(B) Such benefits are exempt from all claims of creditors and from levy, execution, garnishment, attachment, and all other process or remedy for recovery or collection of a debt, which exemption may not be waived.
Dudley v. Morris, 217 N.E.2d 226 (Ohio Ct. App. 1966). · cites it 6דSection 4141.32, Revised Code, prohibits all agreements between an employer and an employee to waive or release the employee’s statutory rights to compensation.”
Ohio Bell Tel. Co. v. Antonelli, 504 N.E.2d 717 (Ohio 1987). · cites it 2ד67 of the Revised Code', “(c) Unemployment compensation benefits, as exempted by section 4141.32 of the Revised Code; “(d) Aid to dependent children payments, as exempted by section 5107.”
Marcum v. Ohio Match Co., 212 N.E.2d 425 (Ohio Ct. App. 1965). · cites it 2ד31, Revised Code, recognizes that benefits are payable under the conditions herein because there is in such statute a provision for reduction of benefits when retirement benefits are paid.”
Nunamaker v. United States Steel Corp., 206 N.E.2d 206 (Ohio 1965). · cites it 2דThat election involved no agreement prohibited by Section 4141.32 of the Revised Code. There can be no doubt that vacation pay is “remuneration,” defined by Section 4141.”
In Re Sparks, 410 B.R. 602 (Bankr. S.D. Ohio 2009). · cites it 2דOhio Rev.Code § 4141.32. Likewise, it is patently obvious that the social security laws are designed to protect and promote the maintenance and support of individuals.”
Mathieu v. Dudley, 226 N.E.2d 763 (Ohio Ct. App. 1967). · cites it 2דAppellee also contends that the letter contract of March 19, 1964, provides a basis for denial of benefits.”
In re Maine, 461 B.R. 723 (Bankr. S.D. Ohio 2011). “The broad exemption language contained in Ohio Revised Code § 4141.32 for unemployment compensation and in 42 U.”
Lorain Cnty. Auditor v. Ohio Unemployment Comp. Review Comm'n, 113 Ohio St. 3d 124 (Ohio 2007). · cites it 2דR.C. 4141.32 prohibits any attempt to contractually or otherwise waive the right to benefits and states that benefits are exempt from all claims of creditors and from levy, execution, garnishment, or attachment.”
Soc'y Nat'l Bank v. Tallman, 483 N.E.2d 170 (Ohio Ct. App. 1984). “83 returned to the bank consisted partly of monies from his unemployment compensation check exempted from garnishment under the provisions of R.C. 4141.32 and partly of earnings at least partly exempted from garnishment under the provisions of R.”
Cont'l Airlines, Inc. v. Dir., Ohio Dep't of Job & Fam. Servs., 878 N.E.2d 647 (Ohio Ct. App. 2007). · cites it 3ד{¶ 29} The Supreme Court acknowledged that R.C. 4141.32 5 “prohibits any attempt to contractually or otherwise waive the right to benefits.”
Steven Hank v. Great Lakes Constr. Co. (6th Cir. 2019). · cites it 3דSpecifically, he argues that it could be applied to bar claims for unemployment benefits, see Ohio Rev. Code § 4141.32, worker’s compensation, see id.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.