Ohio Revised Code

Ohio Rev. Code § 4399.99 (2026)

Penalty

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORCcodes.ohio.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(A) Whoever violates section 4399.16 of the Revised Code shall be fined not less than five nor more than one hundred dollars.

(B) Whoever violates section 4399.09 of the Revised Code shall be fined not less than one hundred nor more than five hundred dollars on a first offense and shall be fined not less than two hundred nor more than five hundred dollars on each subsequent offense.

(C) Whoever violates section 4399.10 of the Revised Code shall be fined not less than one hundred nor more than five hundred dollars and imprisoned not less than one nor more than six months.

(D) Whoever violates section 4399.14 of the Revised Code shall be fined not less than twenty-five nor more than five hundred dollars, imprisoned not more than six months, or both.

(E) Whoever violates section 4399.15 of the Revised Code shall be fined not less than twenty nor more than one hundred dollars, imprisoned not less than twenty nor more than sixty days, or both.

(F) Whoever violates section 4399.17 of the Revised Code is guilty of a felony of the fourth degree.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1983–2014 · leading case: City of Cleveland v. Scott, 457 N.E.2d 351 (Ohio Ct. App. 8th Dist. 1983).
City of Cleveland v. Scott, 457 N.E.2d 351 (Ohio Ct. App. 8th Dist. 1983). · cites it 8× “3 *359 Thus, the legislature did not violate the separation of powers doctrine when it established mandatory sentences for certain liquor law violations as contained in R.C. 4399.99. While we recognize that a reviewing court should not decide a constitutional question if a…”
State v. Boscarino, 2014-Ohio-1270. “R.C. 4399.99(B). The speedy trial limitation for such an offense is typically 45 days.”
Ohio Rev. Code § 4399.99(B): 1 case
State v. Boscarino, 2014-Ohio-1270. “R.C. 4399.99(B). The speedy trial limitation for such an offense is typically 45 days.”
Ohio Rev. Code § 4399.99(C): 1 case
City of Cleveland v. Scott, 457 N.E.2d 351 (Ohio Ct. App. 8th Dist. 1983). “3 *359 Thus, the legislature did not violate the separation of powers doctrine when it established mandatory sentences for certain liquor law violations as contained in R.C. 4399.99. While we recognize that a reviewing court should not decide a constitutional question if a…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.