Ohio Revised Code

Ohio Rev. Code § 4509.19 (2026)

Exceptions to security deposit and suspension

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORCcodes.ohio.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(A) The requirements as to security and suspension in sections 4509.12 and 4509.17 of the Revised Code do not apply:

(1) To the driver or the owner of a motor vehicle involved in an accident in which no injury or damage was caused to the person or property of anyone other than such driver or owner;

(2) To the driver or owner of a motor vehicle which at the time of the accident was parked, unless such motor vehicle was parked at a place where parking was at the time of the accident prohibited under any applicable law or ordinance;

(3) To the owner of a motor vehicle if at the time of the accident the motor vehicle was operated without his permission, express or implied, or was parked by a person who had been operating such motor vehicle without such permission;

(4) To any police officer who while responding to an emergency call assumes custody of a motor vehicle and is driver thereof at the time of the accident;

(5) To the driver or owner if the owner had in effect at the time of the accident an automobile liability policy or bond with respect to the motor vehicle in the accident, except that a driver shall not be exempt under this division of this section if at the time of the accident the motor vehicle was being operated without the owner's permission, express or implied;

(6) To the driver, if not the owner of the motor vehicle involved in the accident, if there was in effect at the time of the accident an automobile liability policy or bond with respect to his driving of motor vehicles not owned by him;

(7) To a driver or owner whose liability for damages resulting from the accident is, in the judgment of the registrar of motor vehicles, covered by any other form of liability insurance policy or bond;

(8) To the driver or owner of a motor vehicle involved in an accident to the extent that the owner of the motor vehicle at the time of the accident was a self-insurer as defined in section 4509.72 of the Revised Code, except that a driver shall not be exempt under this division of this section if at the time of the accident the motor vehicle was being operated without the owner's permission, express or implied;

(9) To the owner of a motor vehicle where such owner is the United States, this state, any political subdivision of this state, any municipal corporation therein or any private volunteer fire company serving a political subdivision of this state.

(B) Whenever the registrar has taken any action or has failed to take any action under section 4509.17 of the Revised Code by reason of having received erroneous information or by reason of having received no information, then upon receiving correct information within six months after the date of a motor vehicle accident the registrar shall take appropriate action to carry out the purposes of sections 4509.01 to 4509.78 of the Revised Code. This division of this section does not require the registrar to re-evaluate the amount of any deposit required under section 4509.12 of the Revised Code.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10 cases, 1960–2018 · leading case: Iszczukiewicz v. Universal Underwriters Ins., 182 F. Supp. 733 (N.D. Ohio 1960).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Iszczukiewicz v. Universal Underwriters Ins., 182 F. Supp. 733 (N.D. Ohio 1960). · cites it 11× “O.R.C. § 4509.19, § 4509.12. If a driver’s license and/or registration has been revoked pursuant to the Act, neither may be reinstated unless any judgment for a prior accident has been satisfied and proof of financial responsibility for future accidents is given and thereafter…”
Snyder v. Roadway Express, Inc., 455 N.E.2d 11 (Ohio Ct. App. 1982). · cites it 2× “12) or produce one of the exempted alternatives (see R.C. 4509.19 and 4509.45) for the protection of that injured party.”
Troyer v. Horvath, 468 N.E.2d 351 (Ohio Ct. App. 1983). · cites it 2× “20 pertinently reads: “(A) A policy or bond does not comply with divisions (A)(5), (A)(6), and (A)(7) of section 4509.19 of the Revised Code unless issued by an insurance company or surety company *157 authorized to do business in this state, except as provided in division (B)…”
Bob-Boyd Lincoln Mercury v. Hyatt, 513 N.E.2d 331 (Ohio 1987). “R.C. 4509.19(A)(5). See 139 Ohio Laws, Part I, 679, 686, 699.”
City of Toledo v. Bernoir, 247 N.E.2d 740 (Ohio 1969). · cites it 2× “Section 4509.19(A)(3), Revised Code, specifically exempts from depositing security “the owner of a motor vehicle if at the time of the accident the motor vehicle was operated without his permission, express or implied.”
Sitta-Bomberi v. Ohio Bureau of Motor Vehs., 2018-Ohio-513, 128 N.E.3d 750. · cites it 5× “{¶ 16} "Where the Registrar of Motor Vehicles determines, as to a motor vehicle operated by anyone other than the owner but with his permission, express or implied, and involved in an accident causing injury or damage to the person or property of anyone other than the owner or…”
Trolio v. McLendon, 211 N.E.2d 65 (Ohio Ct. App. 1965). · cites it 2× “If the insurance company confirms coverage, this satisfies the security requirements under Section 4509.19 (A) (5), Revised Code. Thus, the provisions of Section 4509.”
Iszczukiewicz v. Universal Underwriters Ins., 86 Ohio Law. Abs. 216 (N.D. Ohio 1960). · cites it 19× “Sections 4509.19, 4509.12, Revised Code. If a driver’s license and/or registration has been revoked pursuant to the Act, neither may be reinstated unless any judgment for a prior accident has been satisfied and proof of financial responsibility for future accidents is given and…”
Inman v. Nat'l Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh, 550 N.E.2d 530 (Ohio Ct. App. 1989). “20 (requirements of insurance or bond necessary to excuse deposit of security) which provides in part: “(A) A policy or bond does not comply with * * * [R.C. 4509.19 (A)(5), (6) and (7)] unless such policy or bond is subject * * * to a limit, exclusive of interest and costs, of…”
Babcock v. Bureau of Motor Vehs., 345 N.E.2d 625 (Ohio Ct. App. 1975). · cites it 2× “12, Revised Code, to determine the amount of security sufficient to satisfy any judgment for damages as may be recovered against the owner, provided that the owner is not otherwise specifically excepted from the security requirement by Section 4509.19, Revised Code. “2. In the…”
Ohio Rev. Code § 4509.19(A): 2 cases
Iszczukiewicz v. Universal Underwriters Ins., 182 F. Supp. 733 (N.D. Ohio 1960). “O.R.C. § 4509.19, § 4509.12. If a driver’s license and/or registration has been revoked pursuant to the Act, neither may be reinstated unless any judgment for a prior accident has been satisfied and proof of financial responsibility for future accidents is given and thereafter…”
Iszczukiewicz v. Universal Underwriters Ins., 86 Ohio Law. Abs. 216 (N.D. Ohio 1960). “Sections 4509.19, 4509.12, Revised Code. If a driver’s license and/or registration has been revoked pursuant to the Act, neither may be reinstated unless any judgment for a prior accident has been satisfied and proof of financial responsibility for future accidents is given and…”
Ohio Rev. Code § 4509.19(A)(3): 2 cases
City of Toledo v. Bernoir, 247 N.E.2d 740 (Ohio 1969). “Section 4509.19(A)(3), Revised Code, specifically exempts from depositing security “the owner of a motor vehicle if at the time of the accident the motor vehicle was operated without his permission, express or implied.”
Sitta-Bomberi v. Ohio Bureau of Motor Vehs., 2018-Ohio-513, 128 N.E.3d 750. “{¶ 16} "Where the Registrar of Motor Vehicles determines, as to a motor vehicle operated by anyone other than the owner but with his permission, express or implied, and involved in an accident causing injury or damage to the person or property of anyone other than the owner or…”
Ohio Rev. Code § 4509.19(A)(5): 1 case
Bob-Boyd Lincoln Mercury v. Hyatt, 513 N.E.2d 331 (Ohio 1987). “R.C. 4509.19(A)(5). See 139 Ohio Laws, Part I, 679, 686, 699.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.