(A) No public utility shall make or give any undue or unreasonable preference or advantage to any person, firm, corporation, or locality, or subject any person, firm, corporation, or locality to any undue or unreasonable prejudice or disadvantage.
(B)(1) A natural gas company that is a public utility shall offer its regulated services or goods to all similarly situated consumers, including persons with which it is affiliated or which it controls, under comparable terms and conditions.
(2) A natural gas company that is a public utility and that offers to a consumer a bundled service that includes both regulated and unregulated services or goods shall offer, on an unbundled basis, to that same consumer the regulated services or goods that would have been part of the bundled service. Those regulated services or goods shall be of the same quality as or better quality than, and shall be offered at the same price as or a better price than and under the same terms and conditions as or better terms and conditions than, they would have been had they been part of the company's bundled service.
(3) No natural gas company that is a public utility shall condition or limit the availability of any regulated services or goods, or condition the availability of a discounted rate or improved quality, price, term, or condition for any regulated services or goods, on the basis of the identity of the supplier of any other services or goods or on the purchase of any unregulated services or goods from the company.
Elyria Foundry Co. v. Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 114 Ohio St. 3d 305 (Ohio 2007). · cites it 4ד2, WPS similarly argues that shifting these costs from current to future customers results in subsidies that are specifically barred by R.C. 4905.35. {¶ 60} In large part, WPS merely reasserts its R.”
AK Steel Corp. v. Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 95 Ohio St. 3d 81 (Ohio 2002). · cites it 3ד33 “does not prohibit rate discrimination per se; rather, it prohibits charging different rates when the utility is performing ‘ * * * a like and contemporaneous service under substantially the same circumstances *87 and conditions.”
Weiss v. Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 734 N.E.2d 775 (Ohio 2000). · cites it 3דR.C. 4905.35 prohibits a utility from making or giving “any undue or unreasonable preference or advantage” or imposing “any undue or unreasonable prejudice *17 or disadvantage.”
Ohio Consumers' Couns. v. Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 111 Ohio St. 3d 300 (Ohio 2006). · cites it 2ד” R.C. 4905.35(A) provides that “[n]o public utility shall make or give any undue or unreasonable preference or advantage to any person, firm, corporation, or locality, or subject any person, firm, corporation, or locality to any undue or unreasonable prejudice or disadvantage.”
In re Complaint of Pilkington N. Am., Inc. (Slip Opinion), 2015 Ohio 4797 (Ohio 2015). · cites it 2דPilkington has failed to show that the commission approved a discriminatory rate structure {¶ 32} Pilkington’s final argument under its first proposition of law is that by allowing the 2009 Order to stand, the commission created a discriminatory rate structure in violation of…”
MCI Telecomm. Corp. v. Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 513 N.E.2d 337 (Ohio 1987). · cites it 2דAccording to MCI, this unwarranted subsidy of local exchange company toll rates is an unreasonable and undue preference in violation of R.C. 4905.35 and an unreasonable cross-subsidization in violation of R.”
Allnet Commc'ns Servs., Inc. v. Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 70 Ohio St. 3d 202 (Ohio 1994). “*207 R.C. 4905.35 provides: “No public utility shall make or give any undue or unreasonable preference or advantage to any person, firm, corporation, or locality, or subject any person, firm, corporation, or locality to any undue or unreasonable prejudice or disadvantage.”
DiFranco v. FirstEnergy Corp., 2012 Ohio 5445 (Ohio 2012). “” And R.C. 4905.35 allows utilities to make or give preferences and advantages to customers, so long as they are not “undue or unreasonable.”
In re Application of E. Ohio Gas Co., 2023 Ohio 3289 (Ohio 2023). “05(A)(1), citing R.C. 4905.35. Second, that the natural-gas company is in “substantial compliance with the policy of this state” set forth in R.”
City of Parma v. Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 86 Ohio St. 3d 144 (Ohio 1999). “26 and would result in undue or unreasonable prejudice or disadvantage in violation of R.C. 4905.35. Dates, times, and places for hearings on the complaint were established; notices of the hearings were published in The Plain Dealer, a newspaper of general circulation in…”
Elyria Foundry Co. v. Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 114 Ohio St. 3d 305 (Ohio 2007). “2, WPS similarly argues that shifting these costs from current to future customers results in subsidies that are specifically barred by R.C. 4905.35. {¶ 60} In large part, WPS merely reasserts its R.”
Ohio Consumers' Couns. v. Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 111 Ohio St. 3d 300 (Ohio 2006). “” R.C. 4905.35(A) provides that “[n]o public utility shall make or give any undue or unreasonable preference or advantage to any person, firm, corporation, or locality, or subject any person, firm, corporation, or locality to any undue or unreasonable prejudice or disadvantage.”
AK Steel Corp. v. Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 95 Ohio St. 3d 81 (Ohio 2002). “33 “does not prohibit rate discrimination per se; rather, it prohibits charging different rates when the utility is performing ‘ * * * a like and contemporaneous service under substantially the same circumstances *87 and conditions.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.