Ohio Rev. Code » Chapter 4906
Ohio Revised Code

Ohio Rev. Code § 4906.20 (2026)

Certificate required to construct certain wind farms

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORCcodes.ohio.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Effective:
September 15, 2014
Latest Legislation:
House Bill 483 - 130th General Assembly
PDF:
Download Authenticated PDF
 

(A) No person shall commence to construct an economically significant wind farm in this state without first having obtained a certificate from the power siting board. An economically significant wind farm with respect to which such a certificate is required shall be constructed, operated, and maintained in conformity with that certificate and any terms, conditions, and modifications it contains. A certificate shall be issued only pursuant to this section. The certificate may be transferred, subject to the approval of the board, to a person that agrees to comply with those terms, conditions, and modifications.

(B) The board shall adopt rules governing the certificating of economically significant wind farms under this section. Initial rules shall be adopted within one hundred twenty days after June 24, 2008.

(1) The rules shall provide for an application process for certificating economically significant wind farms that is identical to the extent practicable to the process applicable to certificating major utility facilities under sections 4906.06, 4906.07, 4906.08, 4906.09, 4906.10, 4906.11, and 4906.12 of the Revised Code and shall prescribe a reasonable schedule of application filing fees structured in the manner of the schedule of filing fees required for major utility facilities.

(2) Additionally, the rules shall prescribe reasonable regulations regarding any wind turbines and associated facilities of an economically significant wind farm, including, but not limited to, their location, erection, construction, reconstruction, change, alteration, maintenance, removal, use, or enlargement and including erosion control, aesthetics, recreational land use, wildlife protection, interconnection with power lines and with regional transmission organizations, independent transmission system operators, or similar organizations, ice throw, sound and noise levels, blade shear, shadow flicker, decommissioning, and necessary cooperation for site visits and enforcement investigations.

(a) The rules also shall prescribe a minimum setback for a wind turbine of an economically significant wind farm. That minimum shall be equal to a horizontal distance, from the turbine's base to the property line of the wind farm property, equal to one and one-tenth times the total height of the turbine structure as measured from its base to the tip of its highest blade and be at least one thousand one hundred twenty-five feet in horizontal distance from the tip of the turbine's nearest blade at ninety degrees to property line of the nearest adjacent property at the time of the certification application.

(b)(i) For any existing certificates and amendments thereto, and existing certification applications that have been found by the chairperson to be in compliance with division (A) of section 4906.06 of the Revised Code before the effective date of the amendment of this section by H.B. 59 of the 130th general assembly, September 29, 2013, the distance shall be seven hundred fifty feet instead of one thousand one hundred twenty-five feet.

(ii) Any amendment made to an existing certificate after the effective date of the amendment of this section by H.B. 483 of the 130th general assembly shall be subject to the setback provision of this section as amended by that act. The amendments to this section by that act shall not be construed to limit or abridge any rights or remedies in equity or under the common law.

(c) The setback shall apply in all cases except those in which all owners of property adjacent to the wind farm property waive application of the setback to that property pursuant to a procedure the board shall establish by rule and except in which, in a particular case, the board determines that a setback greater than the minimum is necessary.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 2016–2019 · leading case: In re Application of Champaign Wind, L.L.C. (Slip Opinion), 2016-Ohio-1513, 58 N.E.3d 1142.
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
In re Application of Champaign Wind, L.L.C. (Slip Opinion), 2016-Ohio-1513, 58 N.E.3d 1142. · cites it 12× “When these setbacks were approved, the board relied on the minimum-setback calculation then set forth in R.C. 4906.20, which the board had 25 SUPREME COURT OF OHIO adopted as a rule under its rulemaking authority.”
In re Application of 6011 Greenwich Windpark, L.L.C. (Slip Opinion), 2019-Ohio-2406, 134 N.E.3d 1157. · cites it 67× “] Power Siting Board—Application to modify previously issued siting certificate for wind-powered electric-generation facility to add new turbine models— Power Siting Board’s approval of new wind-turbine models was not an “amendment” of the certificate for purposes of applying…”
Biglin v. S (In re Black Fork Wind Energy, L. L.C.), 124 N.E.3d 787 (Ohio 2018). · cites it 5× “For example, had the board treated the motion for an extension as an application for an amendment, the current setback provisions in R.C. 4906.20 and 4906.201 may have been triggered.”
In re Application of Black Fork Wind Energy, L.L.C. (Slip Opinion), 2018-Ohio-5206. · cites it 5× “For example, had the board treated the motion for an extension as an application for an amendment, the current setback provisions in R.C. 4906.20 and 4906.201 may have been triggered.”
Ohio Rev. Code § 4906.20(B)(1): 1 case
In re Application of 6011 Greenwich Windpark, L.L.C. (Slip Opinion), 2019-Ohio-2406, 134 N.E.3d 1157. “] Power Siting Board—Application to modify previously issued siting certificate for wind-powered electric-generation facility to add new turbine models— Power Siting Board’s approval of new wind-turbine models was not an “amendment” of the certificate for purposes of applying…”
Ohio Rev. Code § 4906.20(B)(2): 4 cases
In re Application of Champaign Wind, L.L.C. (Slip Opinion), 2016-Ohio-1513, 58 N.E.3d 1142. “When these setbacks were approved, the board relied on the minimum-setback calculation then set forth in R.C. 4906.20, which the board had 25 SUPREME COURT OF OHIO adopted as a rule under its rulemaking authority.”
Biglin v. S (In re Black Fork Wind Energy, L. L.C.), 124 N.E.3d 787 (Ohio 2018). “For example, had the board treated the motion for an extension as an application for an amendment, the current setback provisions in R.C. 4906.20 and 4906.201 may have been triggered.”
In re Application of Black Fork Wind Energy, L.L.C. (Slip Opinion), 2018-Ohio-5206. “For example, had the board treated the motion for an extension as an application for an amendment, the current setback provisions in R.C. 4906.20 and 4906.201 may have been triggered.”
In re Application of 6011 Greenwich Windpark, L.L.C. (Slip Opinion), 2019-Ohio-2406, 134 N.E.3d 1157. “] Power Siting Board—Application to modify previously issued siting certificate for wind-powered electric-generation facility to add new turbine models— Power Siting Board’s approval of new wind-turbine models was not an “amendment” of the certificate for purposes of applying…”
Ohio Rev. Code § 4906.20(B)(2)(a): 2 cases
In re Application of Champaign Wind, L.L.C. (Slip Opinion), 2016-Ohio-1513, 58 N.E.3d 1142. “When these setbacks were approved, the board relied on the minimum-setback calculation then set forth in R.C. 4906.20, which the board had 25 SUPREME COURT OF OHIO adopted as a rule under its rulemaking authority.”
In re Application of 6011 Greenwich Windpark, L.L.C. (Slip Opinion), 2019-Ohio-2406, 134 N.E.3d 1157. “] Power Siting Board—Application to modify previously issued siting certificate for wind-powered electric-generation facility to add new turbine models— Power Siting Board’s approval of new wind-turbine models was not an “amendment” of the certificate for purposes of applying…”
Ohio Rev. Code § 4906.20(B)(2)(b)(ii): 3 cases
In re Application of 6011 Greenwich Windpark, L.L.C. (Slip Opinion), 2019-Ohio-2406, 134 N.E.3d 1157. “] Power Siting Board—Application to modify previously issued siting certificate for wind-powered electric-generation facility to add new turbine models— Power Siting Board’s approval of new wind-turbine models was not an “amendment” of the certificate for purposes of applying…”
Biglin v. S (In re Black Fork Wind Energy, L. L.C.), 124 N.E.3d 787 (Ohio 2018). “For example, had the board treated the motion for an extension as an application for an amendment, the current setback provisions in R.C. 4906.20 and 4906.201 may have been triggered.”
In re Application of Black Fork Wind Energy, L.L.C. (Slip Opinion), 2018-Ohio-5206. “For example, had the board treated the motion for an extension as an application for an amendment, the current setback provisions in R.C. 4906.20 and 4906.201 may have been triggered.”
Ohio Rev. Code § 4906.20(B)(2)(c): 2 cases
In re Application of Champaign Wind, L.L.C. (Slip Opinion), 2016-Ohio-1513, 58 N.E.3d 1142. “When these setbacks were approved, the board relied on the minimum-setback calculation then set forth in R.C. 4906.20, which the board had 25 SUPREME COURT OF OHIO adopted as a rule under its rulemaking authority.”
In re Application of 6011 Greenwich Windpark, L.L.C. (Slip Opinion), 2019-Ohio-2406, 134 N.E.3d 1157. “] Power Siting Board—Application to modify previously issued siting certificate for wind-powered electric-generation facility to add new turbine models— Power Siting Board’s approval of new wind-turbine models was not an “amendment” of the certificate for purposes of applying…”
Ohio Rev. Code § 4906.20(B)(c): 1 case
In re Application of Champaign Wind, L.L.C. (Slip Opinion), 2016-Ohio-1513, 58 N.E.3d 1142. “When these setbacks were approved, the board relied on the minimum-setback calculation then set forth in R.C. 4906.20, which the board had 25 SUPREME COURT OF OHIO adopted as a rule under its rulemaking authority.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.