Ohio Revised Code

Ohio Rev. Code § 5107.01 (2026)

Legislative policy

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORCcodes.ohio.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(A) The Ohio general assembly hereby states the following beliefs with regard to the Ohio works first program:

(1) That the first priority for minor heads of household and adults participating in the program is to work, which includes keeping an employer's schedule and satisfying the employer's work requirements, and to develop marketable skills.

(2) That many minor heads of household and adults participating in the program need to complete high school or receive training for an occupation in order to qualify for employment.

(B) The general assembly recognizes that some provisions of the Ohio works first program as operated pursuant to federal waivers granted by the United States secretary of health and human services pursuant to requests made under former section 5101.09 of the Revised Code enacted by Substitute House Bill No. 167 of the 121st general assembly and pursuant to requests made under section 5107.30 of the Revised Code, regarding the LEAP program, prior to the enactment of the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996 (P.L. 104-193) are inconsistent with that act. It is the intent of the general assembly to rely on the federal waivers for authority to conduct the program in the manner specified in this chapter to ensure the work readiness of program participants by requiring at least twenty hours of weekly participation in work activities, including, except as limited by division (B)(2) of section 5107.43 of the Revised Code, a work activity established under section 5107.58 of the Revised Code in which a participant is enrolled full-time in post-secondary education leading to vocation, and no more than ten hours of weekly participation in developmental activities in accordance with sections 5107.40 to 5107.69 of the Revised Code.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases, 1964–2001 · leading case: State v. Edmondson, 750 N.E.2d 587 (Ohio 2001).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Edmondson, 750 N.E.2d 587 (Ohio 2001). “54(B) (“food stamps * * * are the property of the department of job and family services from the time they are received * * * by the department from the federal agency responsible for such delivery until they are received by a household entitled to receive them”); see, also,…”
Mankins v. Paxton, 753 N.E.2d 918 (Ohio Ct. App. 2001). “Code), breach of contract, violations of the Ohio Constitution, and violation of R.C. 5107.01 et seq. (Ohio Works First program).”
State v. Edmondson, 2001 Ohio 210 (Ohio 2001). “54(B) (“food stamps * * * are 6 January Term, 2001 the property of the department of job and family services from the time they are received * * * by the department from the federal agency responsible for such delivery until they are received by a household entitled to receive…”
Goodyear Serv. Store v. Speck, 355 N.E.2d 886 (Ohio Ct. App. 1976). “12, roads : “Aid under sections 5107.01 to 5107.16 [relating to aid to families with dependent children], inclusive, shall.”
Bolin v. White, 367 N.E.2d 63 (Ohio Ct. App. 1976). “02 provides: “The department of public welfare shall administer sections 5107.01 to 5107.16, inclusive, of the Revised Code.”
Crigger v. Crigger, 594 N.E.2d 67 (Ohio Ct. App. 1991). “66 sets forth sources of income and property which cannot be reached in order to satisfy a judgment, and states in pertinent part: “(A) Every person who is domiciled in this state may hold property exempt from execution, garnishment, attachment, or sale to satisfy a judgment or…”
State ex rel. Ray v. South, 176 Ohio St. (N.S.) 241 (Ohio 1964). “mmissioners shall appropriate such sum of money each year as will meet all the administrative expense of the Juvenile Court, including reasonable expenses of the juvenile judge and such officers and employees as he may designate in attending conferences at which juvenile or…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.