Ohio Revised Code

Ohio Rev. Code § 5119.39 (2026)

Certification or accreditation of recovery housing residences

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORCcodes.ohio.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(A) The department of behavioral health shall monitor the operation of recovery housing in this state by doing either of the following:

(1) Certifying recovery housing residences through a process established by the department;

(2) Accepting accreditation, or its equivalent for recovery housing, from one or more of the following:

(a) The Ohio affiliate of the national alliance for recovery residences;

(b) Oxford house, inc.;

(c) Any other organization that is designated by the department for purposes of this section.

(B) If the department certifies recovery housing residences, the department shall, in rules adopted under section 5119.397 of the Revised Code, establish requirements for initial certification and renewal certification, as well as grounds and procedures for disciplinary action against operators of recovery housing residences.

Last updated August 6, 2025 at 1:07 PM

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2003–2020 · leading case: Bd. of Commissioners v. City of Cincinnati, 797 N.E.2d 1027 (Ohio Ct. App. 2003).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Bd. of Commissioners v. City of Cincinnati, 797 N.E.2d 1027 (Ohio Ct. App. 2003). · cites it 9× “e trial court erred in entering summary judgment for the city on four principal grounds: first, that the 1997 transfer of the Millcreek property to the county for the amount of the bond indebtedness did not trigger the right of first refusal; second, that when the General…”
Care Circle, L.L.C. v. Ohio Dept. of Mental Health & Addiction Servs., 2020 Ohio 1382 (Ohio Ct. App. 2020). · cites it 2× “Appellant alleges “[t]here is no evidence in the record that DRO employees followed the guidelines and procedures set forth [in] ORC 5119.39.” R.C. 5119.39 (now renumbered as R.”
Ohio Rev. Code § 5119.39(A): 1 case
Bd. of Commissioners v. City of Cincinnati, 797 N.E.2d 1027 (Ohio Ct. App. 2003). “e trial court erred in entering summary judgment for the city on four principal grounds: first, that the 1997 transfer of the Millcreek property to the county for the amount of the bond indebtedness did not trigger the right of first refusal; second, that when the General…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.