The department of developmental disabilities may enter into a contract with a person or government agency to provide residential services to individuals with developmental disabilities in need of residential services. To be eligible to enter into a contract with the department under this section, a person or government entity and the home in which the residential services are provided must meet all applicable standards for licensing or certification by the appropriate government entity.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 11
cases, 1954–2007 · leading case: Cramer v. Auglaize Acres, 865 N.E.2d 9 (Ohio 2007).
Cramer v. Auglaize Acres, 865 N.E.2d 9 (Ohio 2007). · cites it 2ד11 of the Revised Code; {¶ o} “(viii) A facility providing services under contract with the department of mental retardation and developmental disabilities under section 5123.18 of the Revised Code; {¶ p} “(ix) A facility operated by a hospice care program licensed under section…”
Martin v. Voinovich, 840 F. Supp. 1175 (S.D. Ohio 1993). · cites it 2דOhio Rev.Code § 5123.18. ODMR/DD is required to plan and request additional appropriations for the provision of residential services for all mentally retarded or developmentally disabled persons eligible for residential services who are on waiting lists for the services.”
Clermont Env't Reclamation Co. v. Wiederhold, 442 N.E.2d 1278 (Ohio 1982). · cites it 2דHowever, sub-sections (D), (E) and (G) of R.C. 5123.18 are not reasonably related to the valid purposes and objectives of the regulatory and licensing portions of the other sections of this chapter of law.”
City of Westerville v. Kuehnert, 553 N.E.2d 1085 (Ohio Ct. App. 1988). · cites it 2דThe court held that “family homes,” as defined in R.C. 5123.18 (A)(3) (now R.C. 5123.19[A][3]), had to comply with local zoning laws.”
Bartlett v. Duty, 174 F. Supp. 94 (N.D. Ohio 1959). · cites it 2דCode, §§ 5123.18 and 5123.19. The superintendent of a state mental hospital has the duty to receive and retain a patient under a warrant of commitment issued by the Probate Court.”
In Re Bartlett, 161 N.E.2d 76 (Ohio Ct. App. 1958). · cites it 2ד21, Revised Code, provided as follows: “No hearing shall be had upon the affidavit provided for in Section 5123.18 of the Revised Code, until the probate judge has caused written notice by mail or otherwise as the court directs, to be given to the following persone; *95 “(A) Any…”
Ginn v. Ginn, 175 N.E.2d 848 (Ohio Ct. App. 1960). · cites it 2דOn her return to Ironton, February 2, 1959, she did not go to their home and did not see the plaintiff, but filed an application in the Probate Court of Lawrence County for the admission of the plaintiff to a mental hospital as provided by Section 5123.18, Revised Code, in which…”
In Re Koenigshoff, 119 N.E.2d 652 (Ohio Ct. App. 1954). “While the original proceedings to secure a judgment of mental illness were instituted under §§11890-23 to 11890-27 GC (now §§5123.18 to 5123.23 E. C.) the same principles of law therein set forth are applicable here.”
In re Wertz, 118 N.E.2d 188 (Ohio Ct. App. 1954). “otice and opportunity to be heard at the inquest proceeding render its judgment void for lack of due process? (2) Was the court’s failure to abide by the provisions of 1890-25 such irregularity as demands the vacation of its judgment?” The original proceedings herein, to secure…”
Hamilton v. Dillon, Supt., 167 N.E.2d 356 (Ohio Ct. App. 1959). · cites it 2דIt is alleged by the petitioner that §5123.18 R. C., only permits the “next of kin, or a resident of the county in which the person alleged to be mentally ill has a legal residence” to file the affidavit in the probate court and that Emily I.”
— Ohio Rev. Code § 5123.18(D) — 2 cases
Clermont Env't Reclamation Co. v. Wiederhold, 442 N.E.2d 1278 (Ohio 1982). “However, sub-sections (D), (E) and (G) of R.C. 5123.18 are not reasonably related to the valid purposes and objectives of the regulatory and licensing portions of the other sections of this chapter of law.”
City of Westerville v. Kuehnert, 553 N.E.2d 1085 (Ohio Ct. App. 1988). “The court held that “family homes,” as defined in R.C. 5123.18 (A)(3) (now R.C. 5123.19[A][3]), had to comply with local zoning laws.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.