Ohio Revised Code

Ohio Rev. Code § 5501.51 (2026)

Reimbursing utility for facilities relocated by highway project

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORCcodes.ohio.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(A) The state shall reimburse a utility for the cost of relocation of utility facilities necessitated by the construction of a highway project only in the event that the utility can evidence a vested interest in the nature of a fee interest, an easement interest, or a lesser estate in the real property it occupies in the event that the utility possesses a vested interest in such property. The utility shall present evidence satisfactory to the state substantiating the cost of relocation. The director may audit all financial records which the director determines necessary to verify such actual costs.

(B) The director of transportation may establish and enforce such rules and procedures as the director may determine to be necessary to assure consistency governing any and all aspects of the cost of utility relocations. The director may adopt such amendments to such rules as are necessary and within the guidelines of this section.

(C) As used in this section:

(1) "Cost of relocation" includes the actual cost paid by a utility directly attributable to relocation after deducting any increase in the value of the new facility and any salvage value derived from the old facility.

(2) "Utility" includes all of the following:

(a) Publicly, privately, and cooperatively owned utilities that are subject to the authority of the public utilities commission of Ohio;

(b) A cable operator as defined in the "Cable Communications Policy Act of 1984," 98 Stat. 2780, 47 U.S.C. 522, as amended by the "Telecommunications Act of 1996," 110 Stat. 56, 47 U.S.C. 151, and includes the provision of other information or telecommunications services, or both;

(c) An electric cooperative and a municipal electric utility, both as defined in section 4928.01 of the Revised Code;

(d) County-owned or county-operated water and sewer facilities.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1995–2007 · leading case: City of Perrysburg v. Toledo Edison Co., 870 N.E.2d 189 (Ohio Ct. App. 6th Dist. 2007).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
City of Perrysburg v. Toledo Edison Co., 870 N.E.2d 189 (Ohio Ct. App. 6th Dist. 2007). · cites it 4× “{¶ 42} In their fourth assignment of error, appellant contends that it is entitled to reimbursement pursuant to R.C. 5501.51, which states: {¶ 43} “(A) The state shall reimburse a utility for the cost of relocation of utility facilities necessitated by the construction of a…”
Columbia Gas Transmission Corp. v. Ohio Dep't of Transp., 660 N.E.2d 1225 (Ohio Ct. App. 10th Dist. 1995). “53(D)(1) was amended to require a public utility to show that it had “entered into a franchise or similar agreement with the state or local government on whose property, easement, or right-of-way such facility is located with respect to the use of such property, easement, or…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.