Ohio Rev. Code » Chapter 5563
Ohio Revised Code

Ohio Rev. Code § 5563.10 (2026)

Verdict of jury - court to make finding

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORCcodes.ohio.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Effective:
March 17, 1987
Latest Legislation:
House Bill 412 - 116th General Assembly
PDF:
Download Authenticated PDF
 

At the conclusion of a trial under section 5563.05 of the Revised Code, the judge shall charge the jury and the jury shall determine in its verdict whether the improvement petitioned for or granted will be conducive to the public convenience and welfare, if an order establishing the proposed improvement or dismissing or refusing to grant the prayer of the petition is appealed. The court shall make a finding for or against the improvement, based on the verdict of the jury.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1966–2014 · leading case: In Re Vacation of Twp. Road 114, 216 N.E.2d 768 (Ohio Ct. App. 1966).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
In Re Vacation of Twp. Road 114, 216 N.E.2d 768 (Ohio Ct. App. 1966). · cites it 2× “” Section 5563.10: “# * ⅜ The jury shall also determine in its verdict whether the improvement petitioned for or granted will be conducive to the public convenience and welfare * * *.”
Jeffers v. Athens Cty. Commrs., 2011 Ohio 675 (Ohio Ct. App. 2011). · cites it 2× “The motion indicated that Jeffers “is willing to forego the O.R.C. § 5563.10 appeal on the public convenience and necessity issue as to whether Alexander Township Roads, # 548 and 544, Red Lane and Jeffers Road should be closed, when a proper Chapter 163.”
Goetz v. Bd. of Cnty. Commissioners of Butler Cnty., 517 N.E.2d 244 (Ohio Ct. App. 1986). “) R.C. 5563.10 provides: “At the conclusion of a trial under section 5563.”
Dennison v. Lake Cty. Commrs., 2014 Ohio 4294 (Ohio Ct. App. 2014). “{¶53} R.C. 5563.10 provides that, if an order of the commissioners establishing a road improvement is appealed, at the conclusion of a trial under R.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.