Ohio Revised Code

Ohio Rev. Code § 5717.01 (2026)

Appeal from county board of revision to board of tax appeals - procedure - hearing

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORCcodes.ohio.gov (official) Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

An appeal from a decision of a county board of revision may be taken to the board of tax appeals within thirty days after notice of the decision of the county board of revision is mailed as provided in division (A) of section 5715.20 of the Revised Code. Such an appeal may be taken by the county auditor, the tax commissioner, or any board, legislative authority, public official, or taxpayer authorized by section 5715.19 of the Revised Code to file complaints against valuations or assessments with the auditor, except that a subdivision or the legislative authority or mayor of a subdivision may file such an appeal only if the subdivision owns or leases the property that is the subject of the board of revision's decision, and except that no such appeal may be taken by a third party complainant, as defined in that section. Such appeal shall be taken by the filing of a notice of appeal, in person or by certified mail, express mail, facsimile transmission, electronic transmission, or by authorized delivery service, with the board of tax appeals and with the county board of revision. If notice of appeal is filed by certified mail, express mail, or authorized delivery service as provided in section 5703.056 of the Revised Code, the date of the United States postmark placed on the sender's receipt by the postal service or the date of receipt recorded by the authorized delivery service shall be treated as the date of filing. If notice of appeal is filed by facsimile transmission or electronic transmission, the date and time the notice is received by the board shall be the date and time reflected on a timestamp provided by the board's electronic system, and the appeal shall be considered filed with the board on the date reflected on that timestamp. Any timestamp provided by another computer system or electronic submission device shall not affect the time and date the notice is received by the board. Upon receipt of such notice of appeal such county board of revision shall notify all persons thereof who were parties to the proceeding before such county board of revision by either certified mail or, if the board has record of an internet identifier of record associated with such a person, by ordinary mail and by that internet identifier of record, and shall file proof of such notice or, in the case of ordinary mail, an affidavit attesting that the board sent the notice with the board of tax appeals. The county board of revision shall thereupon certify to the board of tax appeals a transcript of the record of the proceedings of the county board of revision pertaining to the original complaint, and all evidence offered in connection therewith. Such appeal may be heard by the board of tax appeals at its offices in Columbus or in the county where the property is listed for taxation, or the board of tax appeals may cause its examiners to conduct such hearing and to report to it their findings for affirmation or rejection. An appeal may proceed pursuant to section 5703.021 of the Revised Code on the small claims docket if the appeal qualifies under that section.

The board of tax appeals may order the appeal to be heard on the record and the evidence certified to it by the county board of revision, or it may order the hearing of additional evidence, and it may make such investigation concerning the appeal as it deems proper.

As used in this section, "internet identifier of record" has the same meaning as in section 9.312 of the Revised Code.

Last updated July 23, 2025 at 4:02 PM

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 199 cases (50 in the last 5 years), 1953–2026 · leading case: Marysville Exempted Vill. Sch. Dist. Bd. of Edn. v. Union Cty. Bd. of Revision, 2023 Ohio 2020 (Ohio Ct. App. 2023).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Marysville Exempted Vill. Sch. Dist. Bd. of Edn. v. Union Cty. Bd. of Revision, 2023 Ohio 2020 (Ohio Ct. App. 2023). · cites it 39× “The motion to dismiss was based upon a recent amendment to R.C. 5717.01, which substantially restricted the right of a board of education to appeal to the Board of Tax Appeals.”
Marysville Exempted Vill. Schs. Bd. of Edn. v. Union Cty. Bd. of Revision, 2024 Ohio 3323 (Ohio 2024). · cites it 49× “19—R.C. 5717.01—R.C. 5717.01 as amended effective July 21, 2022, does not apply to cases in which a challenge to an auditor’s real-property tax valuation was pending before a board of revision when the amendment took effect—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed and cause remanded…”
Olentangy Local Sch. Dist. Bd. of Edn. v. Delaware Cty. Bd. of Revision, 2024 Ohio 1564 (Ohio Ct. App. 2024). · cites it 16× “Among the most severe of the new restrictions, the General Assembly eliminated the right of boards of education (and other public entities and political subdivisions authorized to participate in board of revision cases) to appeal decisions of boards of revision to the Board of…”
Cleveland Elec. Illum. Co. v. Lake Cty. Bd. of Revision, 2002 Ohio 4033 (Ohio 2002). · cites it 14× “20, including the Tax Commissioner, to start the running of the appeal time set forth in R.C. 5717.01— Requirements of R.C. 5715.20 are mandatory.”
Olentangy Local Sch. Dist. Bd. of Edn. v. Delaware Cty. Bd. of Revision, 2024 Ohio 1566 (Ohio Ct. App. 2024). · cites it 30× “Among the most severe of the new restrictions, the General Assembly eliminated the right of boards of education (and other public entities and political subdivisions authorized to participate in board of revision cases) to appeal decisions of boards of revision to the Board of…”
Ross v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision (Slip Opinion), 2018 Ohio 4746 (Ohio 2018). · cites it 17× “*373 {¶ 1} This case presents a jurisdictional issue that turns on whether appellants, property owners Thomas and Nancy Ross, complied with the requirements set forth in R.C. 5717.01 to appeal a decision of appellee Cuyahoga County Board of Revision ("BOR") to the Board of Tax…”
Olentangy Local Sch. Dist. Bd. of Edn. v. Delaware Cty. Bd. of Revision, 2024 Ohio 1563 (Ohio Ct. App. 2024). · cites it 30× “Among the most severe of the new restrictions, the General Assembly eliminated the right of boards of education (and other public entities and political subdivisions authorized to participate in board of revision cases) to appeal decisions of boards of revision to the Board of…”
Cannata v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision (Slip Opinion), 2016 Ohio 1094 (Ohio 2016). · cites it 10× “{¶ 13} When an appeal has been prosecuted to the BTA from the BOR, R.C. 5717.01 specifically requires the BOR to “certify to the board of tax appeals a transcript of the record of the proceedings of the county board of revision pertaining to the original complaint, and all…”
Dublin City Schs. Bd. of Educ. v. Franklin Cnty. Bd. of Revision, 2013 Ohio 4543 (Ohio 2013). · cites it 6× “I would remand to the BTA with the instruction that the BTA perform an appropriate reduction to account for the unfinished state of the condominiums, basing its finding on the entire record or, if need be, on additional evidence adduced pursuant to the BTA’s authority to “make *…”
Tower City Props. v. Cuyahoga Cnty. Bd. of Revision, 551 N.E.2d 122 (Ohio 1990). · cites it 7× “R.C. 5717.01 and 5717.05. According to former R.”
R.R.Z. Assocs. v. Cuyahoga Cnty. Bd. of Revision, 527 N.E.2d 874 (Ohio 1988). · cites it 5× “Appellant argues that the board of revision can not be made a party to this proceeding under R.C. 5717.01 and thus may not present evidence to the BTA.”
Mason City Sch. Dist. Bd. of Educ. v. Warren Cnty. Bd. of Revision, 2014 Ohio 104 (Ohio 2014). · cites it 5× “See R.C. 5717.01 (requiring the board of revision to give notice of an appeal to the BTA to “all persons * * * who were parties to the proceeding before” the board of revision); former Ohio Adm.”
Show all 199 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.