Oklahoma Statutes
Okla. Stat. tit. 10, § 1107 (2026)
Renumbered as 7003-2.1 of this title by Laws 1995, c
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
OK-LEGoklegislature.gov
JustiaOkla. Stat.
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
352, § 199, eff. July 1, 1995.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 17
cases, 1972–1994 · leading case: DeVooght v. State, 722 P.2d 705 (Okla. Crim. App. 1986).
DeVooght v. State, 722 P.2d 705 (Okla. Crim. App. 1986). “Appellant next asserts that his in-culpatory statements to the police and the evidence obtained therefrom should have been suppressed as being obtained in violation of due process and 10 O.S.1981, §§ 1107 and 1109. He complains that he was held for interrogation without being…”
State Ex Rel. Coats v. Johnson, 597 P.2d 328 (Okla. Crim. App. 1979). “That of course leaves the question of whether or not the juvenile accused of one of the enumerated crimes is entitled to a 10 O.S.Supp. 1978, § 1107, detention hearing.”
J. v. v. State, Dep't of Institutions, Soc. & Rehabilitative Servs., 572 P.2d 1283 (Okla. 1977). “1971 § 1104; 10 O.S.Supp. 1976 § 1107] a summary determination of custody pendente lite.”
Mook v. City of Tulsa, 565 P.2d 1065 (Okla. Crim. App. 1977). “27 of the 1973 Session Laws for the 34th Legislature, First Regular Session, now cited as 10 O.S.Supp.1976, § 1107 is as follows: “AN ACT RELATING TO CHILDREN; AMENDING 10 O.”
J. T. P v. State, 544 P.2d 1270 (Okla. Crim. App. 1975). “Two sections of the Oklahoma Juvenile Court Act, 10 O.S., § 1107 and § 1109, reflect legislative concern for the special problems inherent in the arrest, detention and interrogation of children, and strong legislative intent to assure protection of the rights of children in such…”
Schaffer v. Green, 496 P.2d 375 (Okla. Crim. App. 1972). “See 10 O.S. § 1107 (c). The Petitioner, being of the age of 17 years, may be tried as an adult without certification under the provisions of 21 O.”
JTP v. State, 544 P.2d 1270 (Okla. Crim. App. 1975). “Two sections of the Oklahoma Juvenile Court Act, 10 O.S., § 1107 and § 1109, reflect legislative concern for the special problems inherent in the arrest, detention and interrogation of children, and strong legislative intent to assure protection of the rights of children in such…”
Jordan ex rel. Jordan v. Jackson, 15 F.3d 333 (4th Cir. 1994). “31 (West 1993) (hearing on next court day); Okla.Stat.Ann. tit. 10, § 1107 (West Supp.”
Guest v. Moore, 706 F. Supp. 786 (W.D. Okla. 1987). “Defendants were ordered to brief the following issues: 1) Whether 10 O.S. § 1107(C) (1984 Supp.), requiring that a detained child have a hearing to determine probable cause within one judicial day, applies in this case.”
Okun v. State, 856 P.2d 290 (Okla. Civ. App. 1993). “1991, § 505(A)(3)(b) and 10 O.S.1991, § 1107(A)(1). Section 504 of Title 43 of the Oklahoma Statutes defines “custody proceeding” as used in the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act (UCCJA) as including child neglect or dependency proceedings.”
A. R. T. v. State, 612 P.2d 1366 (Okla. Crim. App. 1980). “The appellant alleges that under 10 O.S.Supp.1979, § 1107, he was illegally detained from the time of arrest, February 19, 1979, until juvenile charges were filed, February 26, 1979.”
Matter of R.P.R.G., 584 P.2d 239 (Okla. Crim. App. 1978). “Title 10 O.S.Supp.1977, § 1107 A, states in part that if a child who has been taken into custody is not released to his parents he “shall be taken immediately before a judge of the district court in the county in which the child is sought to be detained, or to the place of…”
Okla. Stat. tit. 10, § 1107(A)(1): 1 case
Okun v. State, 856 P.2d 290 (Okla. Civ. App. 1993). “1991, § 505(A)(3)(b) and 10 O.S.1991, § 1107(A)(1). Section 504 of Title 43 of the Oklahoma Statutes defines “custody proceeding” as used in the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act (UCCJA) as including child neglect or dependency proceedings.”
Okla. Stat. tit. 10, § 1107(C): 3 cases
Guest v. Moore, 706 F. Supp. 786 (W.D. Okla. 1987). “Defendants were ordered to brief the following issues: 1) Whether 10 O.S. § 1107(C) (1984 Supp.), requiring that a detained child have a hearing to determine probable cause within one judicial day, applies in this case.”
Mook v. City of Tulsa, 565 P.2d 1065 (Okla. Crim. App. 1977). “27 of the 1973 Session Laws for the 34th Legislature, First Regular Session, now cited as 10 O.S.Supp.1976, § 1107 is as follows: “AN ACT RELATING TO CHILDREN; AMENDING 10 O.”
Okun v. State, 856 P.2d 290 (Okla. Civ. App. 1993). “1991, § 505(A)(3)(b) and 10 O.S.1991, § 1107(A)(1). Section 504 of Title 43 of the Oklahoma Statutes defines “custody proceeding” as used in the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act (UCCJA) as including child neglect or dependency proceedings.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.