Okla. Stat. » Title 10 — CHILDREN
Oklahoma Statutes

Okla. Stat. tit. 10, § 7003-7.1 (2026)

Renumbered as § 1-7-101 of Title 10A by Laws 2009, c

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section OK-LEGoklegislature.gov JustiaOkla. Stat. CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

233, § 275, emerg. eff. May 21, 2009.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1997–2008 · leading case: State Ex Rel. Dep't of Human Servs. v. Colclazier, 1997 OK 134 (Okla. 1997).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State Ex Rel. Dep't of Human Servs. v. Colclazier, 1997 OK 134 (Okla. 1997). · cites it 8× “[6] DHS argues that the April 16th order invades the exclusive placement authority vested in DHS pursuant to 10 O.S.Supp.1996, § 7003-7.1(B)(1). DHS also asserts that the May 29th order may be contrary to 42 U.”
Skrapka v. Bonner, 2008 OK 30 (Okla. 2008). “DHS's position is that the intent of 10 O.S. § 7003-7.1(B)(1) was to exclude its determination of the appropriateness of foster-care home placement of a child from the reach of the juvenile court.”
— Okla. Stat. tit. 10, § 7003-7.1(B)(1) — 2 cases
State Ex Rel. Dep't of Human Servs. v. Colclazier, 1997 OK 134 (Okla. 1997). “[6] DHS argues that the April 16th order invades the exclusive placement authority vested in DHS pursuant to 10 O.S.Supp.1996, § 7003-7.1(B)(1). DHS also asserts that the May 29th order may be contrary to 42 U.”
Skrapka v. Bonner, 2008 OK 30 (Okla. 2008). “DHS's position is that the intent of 10 O.S. § 7003-7.1(B)(1) was to exclude its determination of the appropriateness of foster-care home placement of a child from the reach of the juvenile court.”
— Okla. Stat. tit. 10, § 7003-7.1(B)(l) — 1 case
State Ex Rel. Dep't of Human Servs. v. Colclazier, 1997 OK 134 (Okla. 1997). “[6] DHS argues that the April 16th order invades the exclusive placement authority vested in DHS pursuant to 10 O.S.Supp.1996, § 7003-7.1(B)(1). DHS also asserts that the May 29th order may be contrary to 42 U.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.