Oklahoma Statutes

Okla. Stat. tit. 10, § 7301-1.3 (2026)

Renumbered as § 2-1-103 of Title 10A by Laws 2009, c

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section OK-LEGoklegislature.gov JustiaOkla. Stat. CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

234, § 168, emerg. eff. May 21, 2009.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1996–2010 · leading case: Triplet v. Franklin, 365 F. App'x 86 (10th Cir. 2010).
Triplet v. Franklin, 365 F. App'x 86 (10th Cir. 2010). “See Okla. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, §§ 7301-1.3 (4), 7303-4.”
Wilson v. State of Oklahoma, 363 F. App'x 595 (10th Cir. 2010). “Okla. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 7301-1.3 (4).”
D.J.B. v. Pritchett, 134 P.3d 147 (Okla. Crim. App. 2005). · cites it 2× “10 O.S.2001, § 7301-1.3(4). ¶ 5 The second Code provision relied upon by Petitioner is found within 10 O.”
In Re Mb, 2006 OK 63 (Okla. 2006). “Title 10 O.S.2001 § 7301-1.3(4) provides in pertinent part: `Child' or `juvenile' means any person under eighteen (18) years of age, except for .”
Maxey v. State, 922 P.2d 642 (Okla. Crim. App. 1996). “Appellant points to subsequent changes in the statute which provide a further exemption from the definition for any person thirteen years or older who is charged with first degree murder under the reverse certification procedure, see 10 O.S.Supp.1995, § 7301-1.3(4), as evincing…”
Okla. Stat. tit. 10, § 7301-1.3(4): 3 cases
D.J.B. v. Pritchett, 134 P.3d 147 (Okla. Crim. App. 2005). “10 O.S.2001, § 7301-1.3(4). ¶ 5 The second Code provision relied upon by Petitioner is found within 10 O.”
In Re Mb, 2006 OK 63 (Okla. 2006). “Title 10 O.S.2001 § 7301-1.3(4) provides in pertinent part: `Child' or `juvenile' means any person under eighteen (18) years of age, except for .”
Maxey v. State, 922 P.2d 642 (Okla. Crim. App. 1996). “Appellant points to subsequent changes in the statute which provide a further exemption from the definition for any person thirteen years or older who is charged with first degree murder under the reverse certification procedure, see 10 O.S.Supp.1995, § 7301-1.3(4), as evincing…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.