Okla. Stat. » Title 11 — CITIES AND TOWNS
Oklahoma Statutes

Okla. Stat. tit. 11, § 27-132 (2026)

Appeal to Court of Criminal Appeals

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section OK-LEGoklegislature.gov JustiaOkla. Stat. CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

An appeal may be taken to the Court of Criminal Appeals from the final judgment or order of a district court in an appeal from a final judgment of a municipal court in the same manner and to the same extent that appeals are taken from a district court to the Court of Criminal Appeals. Added by Laws 1978, c. 248, § 1, eff. July 1, 1978.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1981–2015 · leading case: Dutton v. City of Midwest City, 2015 OK 51 (Okla. 2015).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Dutton v. City of Midwest City, 2015 OK 51 (Okla. 2015). “11 O.S. § 27-132: "An appeal may be taken to the Court of Criminal Appeals from the final judgment or order of a district court in an appeal from a final judgment of a municipal court in the same manner and to the same extent that appeals are taken from a district court to the…”
Bush v. State, 632 P.2d 764 (Okla. Crim. App. 1981). “248, § 1, now 11 O.S.Supp. 1980, § 27-132. All that is alleged as error is that the trial court erred in failing to sustain the *765 appellant’s demurrer to the evidence.”
Bush v. State, 625 P.2d 633 (Okla. Crim. App. 1981). “248, § 1, now 11 O.S.Supp.1980, § 27-132. The original record includes a certified copy of the district court minute, which minute was entered on June 25, 1980, and filed in the district court clerk’s office on June 26, 1980.”
Dutton v. City of Midwest City, 2015 OK 51 (Okla. 2015). · cites it 4× “" 18 11 O.S. § 27-132: "An appeal may be taken to the Court of Criminal Appeals from the final judgment or order of a district court in an appeal from a final judgment of a municipal court in the same manner and to the same extent that appeals are taken from a district court to…”
Depuy v. State, 629 P.2d 371 (Okla. Crim. App. 1981). “248, § 1, now 11 O.S.Supp.1980, § 27-132. It is the appellant’s sole contention that it was error for the district court to overrule both his motion to dismiss, filed on February 16, 1979, and his amended motion to dismiss, filed on February 26, 1979.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.