Oklahoma Statutes

Okla. Stat. tit. 15, § 169 (2026)

Inconsistent words rejected

✓ current as of July 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section OK-LEGoklegislature.gov JustiaOkla. Stat. CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Words in a contract which are wholly inconsistent with its nature, or with the main intention of the parties, are to be rejected. R.L.1910, § 963.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases, 2017–2018 · leading case: WLM Retail Trust v. Tramlaw Remainderman Ltd. P'ship, 2018 IL App (1st) 170819 (Ill. App. Ct. 2018).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

WLM Retail Trust v. Tramlaw Remainderman Ltd. P'ship, 2018 IL App (1st) 170819 (Ill. App. Ct. 2018). “" Okla. Stat. tit. 15, § 169 (2011). Similarly, "[w]hen through fraud, mistake, or accident, a written contract fails to express the real intention of the parties, such intention is to be regarded, and the erroneous parts of the writing disregarded.”

In re Craig Cnty. Hosp. Auth., 572 B.R. 340 (Bankr. N.D. Okla 2017). “” Okla. Stat. tit. 15, § 169 . . Docket Nos.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.