Okla. Stat. » Title 20 — COURTS
Oklahoma Statutes

Okla. Stat. tit. 20, § 1602.1 (2026)

Power to reformulate question

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section OK-LEGoklegislature.gov JustiaOkla. Stat. CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Power to Reformulate Question. The Supreme Court of this state may reformulate a question of law certified to it. Added by Laws 1997, c. 61, § 4, eff. Nov. 1, 1997.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 20 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1998–2022 · leading case: Am. Econ. Ins. Co. v. Bogdahn, 2004 OK 9 (Okla. 2004).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Am. Econ. Ins. Co. v. Bogdahn, 2004 OK 9 (Okla. 2004). · cites it 5× “See Okla. Stat. tit. 20, §§ 1602.1 , 1604(A)(3).”
Hollaway v. UNUM Life Ins. Co. of Am., 2003 OK 90 (Okla. 2003). · cites it 2× “Therefore, the question has been reformulated pursuant to 20 O.S.2001 § 1602.1. [4] ERISA, like the provisions of the Federal Railroad Safety Act of 1970, recently considered in Hightower v.”
Pino v. United States, 507 F.3d 1233 (10th Cir. 2007). “12, § 1053 , afford a cause of action for the wrongful death of a nonviable stillborn fetus? Pursuant to Okla. Stat. tit. 20, §§ 1602.1 and 1604(A)(3), the Oklahoma Supreme Court may reformulate this question of law.”
Morgan v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Insur. Co., 2021 OK 27 (Okla. 2021). “See 20 O.S. § 1602.1. We invoke that authority here.”
McClure v. ConocoPhillips Co., 2006 OK 42 (Okla. 2006). “Questions of law may be reformulated pursuant to 20 O.S.2001 § 1602.1. See also Strong v. Laubach, 2004 OK 21, ¶ 1 , 89 P.”
McQueen, Rains & Tresch, LLP v. CITGO Petroleum Corp., 2008 OK 66 (Okla. 2008). “, joins, concurring in the court's answer to the first question and concurring in result in the court's answer to the second question. ¶ 1 As affected as today's answer to the second question must be by several unknown fact-dependent considerations, it is incapable of a concrete…”
Kruchowski v. Weyerhaeuser Co., 2008 OK 105 (Okla. 2009). “The Supreme Court and the Court of Criminal Appeals may answer a question of law certified to it by a court of the United States, or by an appellate court of another state, or of a federally recognized Indian tribal government, or of Canada, a Canadian province or territory,…”
Sullins v. Am. Med. Response of Oklahoma, Inc., 2001 OK 20 (Okla. 2001). “[5] 20 O.S.Supp.2000, § 1602.1. [6] The Inter-local Cooperation Agreement between Tulsa and Oklahoma City is authorized by 74 O.”
Siloam Springs Hotel, LLC v. Century Sur. Co., 2017 OK 14 (Okla. 2017). · cites it 2× “This authority is set out in 20 O.S. 2011 § 1602.1, which provides: "[t]he Supreme Court of this state may reformulate a question of law certified to it.”
Cont'l Resources v. Wolla Oilfield Servs., 2022 OK 40 (Okla. 2022). · cites it 2× “3d 390 20 O.S. 2021, § 1602.1 III. ANALYSIS ¶7 The purpose of the OCPA is to prohibit unlawful practices and conduct made in connection with a consumer transaction.”
Local 514 Transp. Workers Union v. Keating, 358 F.3d 743 (10th Cir. 2004). “See Okla. Stat. tit. 20, §§ 1602.1 , 1604(A)(3).”
Ply v. Nat'l Union Fire Ins. Co., 2003 OK 97 (Okla. 2003). “[10] 20 O.S.2001, § 1602.1. [11] UM coverage is triggered if the at-fault motorist is a co-employee even though the co-employee is not answerable in a tort action because of the workers' compensation immunity.”
Show all 20 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.