Oklahoma Statutes

Okla. Stat. tit. 21, § 1151a (2026)

Forfeiture of right to dispose of body of decedent

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section OK-LEGoklegislature.gov JustiaOkla. Stat. CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Any person entitled by law to the right to dispose of the body of the decedent shall forfeit that right, and the right shall be passed on to the next qualifying person as listed in Section 1158 of Title 21 of the Oklahoma Statutes, in the following circumstances: 1. Any person charged with first or second degree murder or voluntary manslaughter in connection with the death of the decedent, and whose charges are known to the funeral director; provided, however that if the charges against such person are dropped, or if such person is acquitted of the charges, the right of disposition shall be returned to the person; 2. Any person who does not exercise the right of disposition within three (3) days of notification of the death of the decedent or within five (5) days of the death of the decedent, whichever is earlier; or 3. If the district court, pursuant to Title 58 of the Oklahoma Statutes, determines that the person entitled to the right of disposition and the decedent were estranged at the time of death. For purposes of this paragraph, “estranged” means a physical and emotional separation from the decedent at the time of death that clearly demonstrates an absence of due affection, trust and regard for the decedent. Added by Laws 2011, c. 208, § 2, eff. Nov. 1, 2011.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case (1 in the last 5 years), 2023–2023 · leading case: In the Matter of the Est. of Atkeson, 2023 OK CIV APP 46 (Okla. Civ. App. 2023).
In the Matter of the Est. of Atkeson, 2023 OK CIV APP 46 (Okla. Civ. App. 2023). · cites it 16× “The pivotal issue is whether the district court correctly denied Criswell's motion based on its conclusion that Criswell lacked standing pursuant to 21 O.S.2011 §§ 1151a(3) and 1158. After review, we find the decision was correct and we affirm.”
— Okla. Stat. tit. 21, § 1151a(3) — 1 case
In the Matter of the Est. of Atkeson, 2023 OK CIV APP 46 (Okla. Civ. App. 2023). “The pivotal issue is whether the district court correctly denied Criswell's motion based on its conclusion that Criswell lacked standing pursuant to 21 O.S.2011 §§ 1151a(3) and 1158. After review, we find the decision was correct and we affirm.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.