Oklahoma Statutes

Okla. Stat. tit. 21, § 51A (2026)

Repealed by Laws 1997, c. 133, § 602, eff. July 1, 1999

✓ current as of July 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section OK-LEGoklegislature.gov JustiaOkla. Stat. CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

NOTE: Laws 1998, 1st Ex.Sess., c. 2, § 23 amended the effective date of Laws 1997, c. 133, § 602 from July 1, 1998, to July 1, 1999.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 13 cases, 1977–1996 · leading case: Nipps v. State, 576 P.2d 310 (Okla. Crim. App. 1978).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Nipps v. State, 576 P.2d 310 (Okla. Crim. App. 1978). · cites it 4× “We agree with the defendant in this assignment of error in that 21 O.S.Supp. 1975, § 51A, is a limitation on 21 O.”

Clonce v. State, 588 P.2d 584 (Okla. Crim. App. 1978). · cites it 3× “4A, which includes the judgment and commitment document and the court appearance docket from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, does not establish when the defendant completed his sentence so as to determine whether the limitation of 21…”

Chapple v. State, 866 P.2d 1213 (Okla. Crim. App. 1994). · cites it 2× “Under the plain language of the enhancement statute, 21 O.S.1981, § 51A, the twenty-two (22) year old armed robbery conviction can not be used to enhance punishment: No person shall be sentenced as a second and subsequent offender .”

Venable v. State, 567 P.2d 1006 (Okla. Crim. App. 1977). · cites it 3× “He argues that the provisions of 21 O.S.Supp. 1975, § 51A should be extended to, and construed as a part of, 22 O.”

Coats v. State, 589 P.2d 693 (Okla. Crim. App. 1978). · cites it 2× “The judgments and sentences are dated September 9, 1954.”

Robinson v. State, 806 P.2d 1128 (Okla. Crim. App. 1991). · cites it 2× “1 He contended that, relative to the instant November 5, 1987, charge, his prior convictions are stale under 21 O.S.Supp.1975, § 51A, which reads as follows: No person shall be sentenced as a second and subsequent offender under Section 51 of Title 21, or any other section of…”

Coats v. State, 589 P.2d 689 (Okla. Crim. App. 1978). · cites it 2× “Title 21 O.S.Supp.1976, § 51A reads as follows: “No person shall be sentenced as a second and subsequent offender under Section 51 of Title 21, or any other section of the Oklahoma Statutes, when a period of ten (10) years has elapsed since the completion of the sentence imposed…”

Morris v. State, 607 P.2d 1187 (Okla. Crim. App. 1980). “In support of his position, the appellant cites 21 O.S.Supp. 1976, § 51A, and 12 O.S.Supp.”

Banks v. State, 654 P.2d 631 (Okla. Crim. App. 1982). · cites it 2× “ignment of error, the appellant argues that the trial court erred by admitting testimony of a probation officer regarding Banks’ history of parole and parole violation, 2 and failing to grant *633 his motion for a mistrial, A review of the record discloses that the prosecutor…”

Harmon v. State, 748 P.2d 992 (Okla. Crim. App. 1988). “] 21 O.S.1981, § 51A. This statute was construed in Nipps v.”

Kolberg v. State, 925 P.2d 66 (Okla. Crim. App. 1996). “21 O.S.1991, § 51A. Pointing to the language “the completion of the sentence” and “or any other section of the Oklahoma Statutes,” the State argues this provision encompasses the DUI statute which is in “any other section” of the statutes.”

McIntosh v. State, 810 P.2d 373 (Okla. Crim. App. 1991). “1985, § 51 and 21 O.S.1981, § 51A, the State could have introduced evidence of the convictions had appellant not admitted to the convictions.”

Show all 13 citing cases →

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.