Oklahoma Statutes
Okla. Stat. tit. 21, § 791 (2026)
Robbery defined
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
OK-LEGoklegislature.gov
JustiaOkla. Stat.
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Robbery is a wrongful taking of personal property in the possession of another, from his person or immediate presence, and against his will, accomplished by means of force or fear. R.L.1910, § 2364.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 89
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1955–2023 · leading case: State v. Owens, 20 S.W.3d 634 (Tenn. 2000).
State v. Owens, 20 S.W.3d 634 (Tenn. 2000). “02 (Anderson 1999); Okla.Stat.Ann. tit. 21, §§ 791 to 792 (West 1983); Or.”
Primeaux v. State, 2004 OK CR 16 (Okla. Crim. App. 2004). “In addition, the Court notes in its opinion that this provision "has been unchanged for many years." Court Opinion, p. 906. [5] The crime of robbery with a dangerous weapon includes all the elements of robbery by force or fear, and then adds the element of use of a firearm or…”
United States v. Pereira-Gomez, 903 F.3d 155 (2d Cir. 2018). “§ 30-16-2 ("from the person of another or from the immediate control of another"); Okla. Stat. tit. 21, § 791 ("from his person or immediate presence"); State v.”
Romano v. Gibson, 239 F.3d 1156 (10th Cir. 2001). “, Okla. Stat. tit. 21, § 791 ). Woodruff and Romano argue that they did not rob or kill Roger Sarfaty.”
United States v. Pedro Santiesteban-Hernandez, 469 F.3d 376 (5th Cir. 2006). “00 (McKinney 2003); Okla. Stat. Ann. tit. 21, § 791 (West 2002); R.”
Diaz v. State, 728 P.2d 503 (Okla. Crim. App. 1986). “See 21 O.S.1981, § 791; OUJI-CR 486 and commission comment.”
David Leon Cummings v. Edward Evans, Warden Attorney Gen. of the State of Oklahoma, 161 F.3d 610 (10th Cir. 1998). “See Okla. Stat. Ann. tit. 21, §§ 791 ,801. 2 .”
McElmurry v. State, 2002 OK CR 40 (Okla. Crim. App. 2002). “” 21 O.S.1991, § 791. ¶ 66 As to Appellant’s unsupported allegation that a medical examiner was not qualified to give an opinion on pain, we note that the medical examiner in this case testified that he first obtained his degree as a Doctor of Osteopathy before he specialized in…”
Mitchell v. State, 884 P.2d 1186 (Okla. Crim. App. 1994). “21 O.S.1991, § 791, 801; Carter v. State, 725 P.”
Crawford v. State, 840 P.2d 627 (Okla. Crim. App. 1992). “1981, § 1431); Robbery by Force, After Former Conviction of a Felony (21 O.S.1981, § 791); and Larceny of an Automobile, After Former Conviction of a Felony (21 O.”
Ashinsky v. State, 780 P.2d 201 (Okla. Crim. App. 1989). “21 O.S.1981, § 791; 21 O.S.Supp.1982, § 801.”
Wackerly v. State, 2000 OK CR 15 (Okla. Crim. App. 2000). “[15] On March 3, 2000, Appellant filed a Motion to Amend Original Application For Evidentiary Hearing on Sixth Amendment Claim in which he urges this Court to consider a tape recording of an OSBI interview with Michelle Wackerly and her attorney. Appellant avers that this tape…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.