Okla. Stat. » Title 22 — CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
Oklahoma Statutes

Okla. Stat. tit. 22, § 1054.1 (2026)

Perfecting appeal without filing motion for new trial

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section OK-LEGoklegislature.gov JustiaOkla. Stat. CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The right of a party to perfect an appeal from a judgment, order or decree of the trial court to the Court of Criminal Appeals shall not be conditioned upon his having filed in the trial court a motion for a new trial, but in the event a motion for a new trial is filed in the trial court by a party adversely affected by the judgment, order or decree, no appeal to the Court of Criminal Appeals may be taken until subsequent to the ruling by the trial court on the motion for a new trial. Added by Laws 1985, c. 99, § 1, emerg. eff. May 28, 1985.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1987–2020 · leading case: Brecheen v. State, 732 P.2d 889 (Okla. Crim. App. 1987).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Brecheen v. State, 732 P.2d 889 (Okla. Crim. App. 1987). · cites it 2× “22 O.S.Supp. 1986, § 1054.1. [2] The United States Supreme Court mentioned the statutory provision in Gregg v.”
Steffey v. State, 916 P.2d 263 (Okla. Crim. App. 1996). · cites it 2× “” 22 O.S.1991, § 1054.1. When a motion for new trial, on grounds other than newly discovered evidence, is timely filed in the District Court, the Judgment and Sentence shaE not be considered imposed for purposes of an appeal and this Court’s Rules until the motion for new trial…”
Runnels v. State, 896 P.2d 564 (Okla. Crim. App. 1995). “Thus, no signifi--cant rights are lost by the failure to pursue strategies or remedies at the hearing for new trial.”
Cross v. State, 2020 OK CR 1 (Okla. Crim. App. 2020). “" 22 O.S.2011, § 1054.1; see also Steffey v.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.