Oklahoma Statutes

Okla. Stat. tit. 22, § 1089.7 (2026)

Appeal to Court of Criminal Appeals - Bail - Review

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section OK-LEGoklegislature.gov JustiaOkla. Stat. CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

In the event the state's application to appeal is denied and the assigned judge affirms the magistrate's ruling or order, that ruling or order shall be appealable to the Court of Criminal Appeals.

During the pendency of any such appeal, the assigned judge shall admit the defendant to bail upon his own recognizance. The Court of Criminal Appeals shall affirm, reverse or modify the magistrate's order and remand the cause for further proceedings consistent with its ruling. Added by Laws 1987, c. 162, § 7, emerg. eff. June 25, 1987.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases, 1989–2016 · leading case: State v. Young, 1999 OK CR 14 (Okla. Crim. App. 1999).
State v. Young, 1999 OK CR 14 (Okla. Crim. App. 1999). “22 O.S.1991, § 1089.7. In the event the State appeals an adverse ruling pursuant to § 1053, that adverse ruling is directly appealable to this Court.”
State v. Sittingdown, 2010 OK CR 22 (Okla. Crim. App. 2010). “The State appeals to this Court pursuant to 22 O.S.2001, § 1089.7. ¶ 3 This appeal was automatically assigned to the Accelerated Docket of this Court.”
State v. Hall, 2008 OK CR 15 (Okla. Crim. App. 2008). “S-2007-106 & 107, pursuant to 22 O.S.2001, § 1089.7. Written Notices of Intent to Appeal (the quashing of the Informations, etc.”
Moss v. Dist. Court of Tulsa Cnty., 795 P.2d 103 (Okla. Crim. App. 1989). “OPINION LANE, Vice Presiding Judge: The State of Oklahoma appeals pursuant to 22 O.S.Supp.1987, § 1089.7 from the District Court Order affirming dismissal by the magistrate in preliminary examination of the charge of Lewd Molestation against David Glen Sawyer in Tulsa County…”
State v. Vincent, 2016 OK CR 7 (Okla. Crim. App. 2016). · cites it 2× “From this adverse ruling, the State appeals to this Court pursuant to 22 O.S.2011, § 1089.7. ¶2 The appeal was automatically assigned to the Accelerated Docket of this Court.”
State v. Murray, 947 P.2d 591 (Okla. Crim. App. 1997). “See 22 O.S.1991, § 1089.7. Pursuant to 22 O.S.”
State v. Matthews, 808 P.2d 691 (Okla. Crim. App. 1991). “Pursuant to 22 O.S.Supp.1987, § 1089.7, the State has perfected an appeal from that ruling to this Court.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.