Okla. Stat. » Title 22 — CRIMINAL PROCEDURE
Oklahoma Statutes

Okla. Stat. tit. 22, § 1175.6 (2026)

Disposition orders - Placement in secure ward

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section OK-LEGoklegislature.gov JustiaOkla. Stat. CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Upon the finding by the jury or the court as provided by Section 1175.5 of this title, the court shall issue the appropriate order regarding the person as follows: 1. If the person is found to be competent, the criminal proceedings shall be resumed; 2. If the person is found to be incompetent because the person is a person requiring treatment as defined in Title 43A of the Oklahoma Statutes, the court shall issue the appropriate order as set forth in Section 1175.6a of this title; 3. If the person is found to be incompetent because the person is intellectually disabled as defined in Section 1408 of Title 10 of the Oklahoma Statutes, the court shall issue the appropriate order as set forth in Section 1175.6b of this title; and 4. If the person is found to be incompetent for reasons other than the person is a person requiring treatment as defined by Section 1-103 of Title 43A of the Oklahoma Statutes, or for reasons other than the person is intellectually disabled as defined in Section 1408 of Title 10 of the Oklahoma Statutes, the court shall

issue the appropriate order as set forth in Section 1175.6c of this title. Added by Laws 1980, c. 336, § 6, emerg. eff. June 25, 1980. Amended by Laws 1983, c. 104, § 2, eff. Nov. 1, 1983; Laws 1989, c. 75, § 1, emerg. eff. April 17, 1989; Laws 1989, c. 348, § 17, eff. Nov. 1, 1989; Laws 1990, c. 51, § 18, emerg. eff. April 9, 1990; Laws 1997, c. 407, § 6, eff. Nov. 1, 1997; Laws 2000, c. 421, § 7, eff. Nov. 1, 2000; Laws 2004, c. 106, § 5, eff. April 1, 2005; Laws 2019, c. 475, § 23, eff. Nov. 1, 2019.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1986–2024 · leading case: Allen v. Mullin, 368 F.3d 1220 (10th Cir. 2004).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Allen v. Mullin, 368 F.3d 1220 (10th Cir. 2004). “See Okla. Stat. Ann. tit. 22, § 1175.6 . He would not have been permitted to proceed to trial.”
Miller v. State, 751 P.2d 733 (Okla. Crim. App. 1988). “22 O.S.1981, § 1175.6(3). Once competency is restored, the criminal proceedings shall resume.”
Scott v. State, 730 P.2d 7 (Okla. Crim. App. 1986). “” Title 22 O.S.1981, § 1175.6(1). The appellant in this case made an application to the trial court for a competency determination.”
Anderson v. State, 765 P.2d 1232 (Okla. Crim. App. 1988). “22 O.S.1981, § 1175.6(1). Therefore, having failed to comply with Section 1175.”
Briggs v. Friesen (N.D. Okla. 2024). “” Okla. Stat. tit. 22, § 1175.6 (2); [Doc. 51, pp.”
Okla. Stat. tit. 22, § 1175.6(1): 2 cases
Scott v. State, 730 P.2d 7 (Okla. Crim. App. 1986). “” Title 22 O.S.1981, § 1175.6(1). The appellant in this case made an application to the trial court for a competency determination.”
Anderson v. State, 765 P.2d 1232 (Okla. Crim. App. 1988). “22 O.S.1981, § 1175.6(1). Therefore, having failed to comply with Section 1175.”
Okla. Stat. tit. 22, § 1175.6(3): 1 case
Miller v. State, 751 P.2d 733 (Okla. Crim. App. 1988). “22 O.S.1981, § 1175.6(3). Once competency is restored, the criminal proceedings shall resume.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.