Oklahoma Statutes

Okla. Stat. tit. 22, § 984.1 (2026)

Renumbered as § 142A-8 of Title 21 by Laws 2010, c. 135,

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section OK-LEGoklegislature.gov JustiaOkla. Stat. CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

§ 19, eff. Nov. 1, 2010.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 18 cases, 1995–2013 · leading case: Dodd v. State, 2004 OK CR 31 (Okla. Crim. App. 2004).
Dodd v. State, 2004 OK CR 31 (Okla. Crim. App. 2004). · cites it 4× “[8] 22 O.S.2001, § 984.1(A). It is true that, in a case involving a deceased crime victim, the language of § 984.”
Ledbetter v. State, 933 P.2d 880 (Okla. Crim. App. 1997). · cites it 4× “[15] There is language in 22 O.S.Supp.1993, § 984.1(B) which states that a person preparing a presentence investigation report "shall consult with each victim or members of the immediate family or a designee of members of the immediate family if the victim is deceased, .”
Wilson v. Sirmons, 536 F.3d 1064 (10th Cir. 2008). · cites it 2× “As is required by 22 Okla. Stat. Ann. tit. 22, § 984.1 (C), the victim impact statements in written form were provided to the defendant in advance of sentencing.”
Hammon v. State, 2000 OK CR 7 (Okla. Crim. App. 2000). · cites it 4× “¶ 30 Hammon complains that the recommendation of a death sentence by the family members was improper.”
Parker v. State, 917 P.2d 980 (Okla. Crim. App. 1996). · cites it 2× “Title 22 O.S.Supp.1993, § 984.1 provides: Each victim, or members of the immediate family of each victim or person designated by the victim or by family members of the victim, may present a written victim impact statement or appear personally at the sentence proceeding and…”
Miller v. State, 313 P.3d 934 (Okla. Crim. App. 2013). · cites it 2× “1(A) ('Each victim, or members of the immediate family of each victim or person designated by the victim or by family members of the victim, may present a written victim impact statement or appear personally at the sentence proceeding and present the statement{ ] orally.”
Lambert v. State, 2003 OK CR 11 (Okla. Crim. App. 2003). · cites it 2× “2d 420, 422 ; 22 O.S.2001, § 984.1. [3] 22 O.S.2001, § 929(B)(2)(resentencing in non-capital cases).”
Charm v. State, 924 P.2d 754 (Okla. Crim. App. 1996). · cites it 2× “Charm first claims the victim impact statements were presented in violation of the procedure set forth in 22 O.S.Supp.1993, § 984.1(A). The chosen family members presented their testimony in a question-and-answer format.”
Willingham v. State, 947 P.2d 1074 (Okla. Crim. App. 1997). · cites it 2× “22 O.S.Supp.1992, § 984.1(A). This Court has stated that both "victim impact statements" and "victim impact evidence" are admissible in a capital sentencing procedure.”
Smith v. State, 932 P.2d 521 (Okla. Crim. App. 1996). · cites it 2× “Title 22 O.S.Supp.1992, § 984.1(A) provides that "[a] victim, or a member of the immediate family of the victim, may present a written victim impact statement or, at the court's option, appear personally at the sentencing proceeding and present the statement orally.”
Short v. State, 1999 OK CR 15 (Okla. Crim. App. 1999). · cites it 2× “Title 22 O.S.Supp. 1993, § 984.1 restricts those who may give victim impact evidence to members of the victim's family or someone designated by the family.”
Grant v. State, 2002 OK CR 36 (Okla. Crim. App. 2003). · cites it 2× “"Pursuant to 22 O.S.Supp.1993, § 984.1, a victim's family member may present an impact statement through testimony or through a written statement.”
— Okla. Stat. tit. 22, § 984.1(A) — 7 cases
Dodd v. State, 2004 OK CR 31 (Okla. Crim. App. 2004). “[8] 22 O.S.2001, § 984.1(A). It is true that, in a case involving a deceased crime victim, the language of § 984.”
Miller v. State, 313 P.3d 934 (Okla. Crim. App. 2013). “1(A) ('Each victim, or members of the immediate family of each victim or person designated by the victim or by family members of the victim, may present a written victim impact statement or appear personally at the sentence proceeding and present the statement{ ] orally.”
Charm v. State, 924 P.2d 754 (Okla. Crim. App. 1996). “Charm first claims the victim impact statements were presented in violation of the procedure set forth in 22 O.S.Supp.1993, § 984.1(A). The chosen family members presented their testimony in a question-and-answer format.”
Willingham v. State, 947 P.2d 1074 (Okla. Crim. App. 1997). “22 O.S.Supp.1992, § 984.1(A). This Court has stated that both "victim impact statements" and "victim impact evidence" are admissible in a capital sentencing procedure.”
Smith v. State, 932 P.2d 521 (Okla. Crim. App. 1996). “Title 22 O.S.Supp.1992, § 984.1(A) provides that "[a] victim, or a member of the immediate family of the victim, may present a written victim impact statement or, at the court's option, appear personally at the sentencing proceeding and present the statement orally.”
— Okla. Stat. tit. 22, § 984.1(B) — 1 case
Ledbetter v. State, 933 P.2d 880 (Okla. Crim. App. 1997). “[15] There is language in 22 O.S.Supp.1993, § 984.1(B) which states that a person preparing a presentence investigation report "shall consult with each victim or members of the immediate family or a designee of members of the immediate family if the victim is deceased, .”
— Okla. Stat. tit. 22, § 984.1(C) — 1 case
Ledbetter v. State, 933 P.2d 880 (Okla. Crim. App. 1997). “[15] There is language in 22 O.S.Supp.1993, § 984.1(B) which states that a person preparing a presentence investigation report "shall consult with each victim or members of the immediate family or a designee of members of the immediate family if the victim is deceased, .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.