Oklahoma Statutes
Okla. Stat. tit. 24, § 112 (2026)
Short title
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
OK-LEGoklegislature.gov
JustiaOkla. Stat.
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
This act shall be known and may be cited as the "Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act". Added by Laws 1986, c. 100, § 1, eff. Nov. 1, 1986.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 20
cases (7 in the last 5 years), 1989–2022 · leading case: Stillwater Nat'l Bank & Trust Co. v. Kirtley (In Re Solomon), 299 B.R. 626 (10th Cir. BAP 2003).
Stillwater Nat'l Bank & Trust Co. v. Kirtley (In Re Solomon), 299 B.R. 626 (10th Cir. BAP 2003). “§ 544 (b)(1), this transfer is subject to scrutiny under Oklahoma’s Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act, Okla. Stat. tit. 24, § 112 et seq. The Oklahoma UFTA contains a four year statute of limitations.”
Soulé v. Alliot (In Re Tiger Petroleum Co.), 319 B.R. 225 (Bankr. N.D. Okla 2004). “See Okla. Stat. Ann. tit. 24 § 112 et. seq. (West 1987).”
Sheffield Steel Corp. v. HMK Enter., Inc. (In Re Sheffield Steel Corp.), 320 B.R. 423 (Bankr. N.D. Okla 2004). “24 O.S. § 112, et seq. 13 . See also Jones Truck Lines, Inc.”
Burrows v. Burrows, 886 P.2d 984 (Okla. 1994). “Actions for fraudulent transfers are brought pursuant to the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act (the Act), 24 O.S.1991 §§ 112 et seq. Title 24 O.S.1991 § 113, see note 10, infra, defines an asset as property of a debtor, but excludes property to the extent it is generally exempt…”
Com. Fin. Servs., Inc. v. Temple (In Re Com. Fin. Servs., Inc.), 294 B.R. 164 (Bankr. N.D. Okla 2003). “On July 24, 2002, Plaintiffs filed a First Amended Complaint adding claims under the Oklahoma Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act, Okla Stat Ann. tit. 24, § 112 et seq. (West 1987) and alleging the existence and validity of the Tolling Agreement.”
Rose Grp., L.L.C. v. Miller, 64 P.3d 573 (Okla. Civ. App. 2003). “It is entitled to pursue in its own name such remedies as those provided by the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act, 24 O.S.1991 § 112 et seq., and by 12 O.S.”
Dyer v. Eckols, 808 S.W.2d 531 (Tex. App. 1991). “11 (Anderson 1979); Okla.Stat.Ann. tit. 24 §§ 112 to 123 (West 1989); Or.”
Eck v. USA Prop. Co. (In re Dodd), 97 B.R. 74 (Bankr. N.D. Okla 1989). “§ 544 (b) and 24 O.S.1986 § 112 et seq., to avoid alleged fraudulent transfers by Debtors.”
Transp. All. Bank, Inc. v. Arrow Trucking Co., 766 F. Supp. 2d 1188 (N.D. Okla. 2011). “See 24 O.S. § 112 et seq. As TAB concedes, claims brought under this act must be pursued by the bankruptcy trustee.”
Eskridge v. Nalls, 852 P.2d 818 (Okla. Civ. App. 1993). “In his first cause of action, Appellant alleged that in 1983 Jackson had executed two warranty deeds conveying real property to Nalls; he was defrauded of certain monies in 1981 and 1982 by Jackson; and, the 1983 conveyances constituted fraudulent transfers in violation of the…”
Farm Credit Bank of Wichita v. Woodring, 851 P.2d 532 (Okla. 1993). “Title 24 O.S.1991 § 112 et seq. 3 . Title 24 O.”
Blevins v. Proprietor Prop. Trust, 884 P.2d 861 (Okla. Civ. App. 1994). “” In her petition, Appellant raised allegations of transfers made in violation of the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act, 24 O.S.1991 §§ 112 et seq., by her reference to the transfers as “shams”.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.