Oklahoma Statutes
Okla. Stat. tit. 40, § 2-601 (2026)
Applicability
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
OK-LEGoklegislature.gov
JustiaOkla. Stat.
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
APPLICABILITY. This part applies to appeals from determinations of the Commission or its representatives to its appeals tribunal, to appeals from decisions of its appeals tribunal to the Board of Review and to judicial review of decisions of the Board of Review. Added by Laws 1980, c. 323, § 2-601, eff. Oct. 1, 1980.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2005–2025 · leading case: Owens v. Zumwalt, 503 P.3d 1211 (Okla. 2022).
Owens v. Zumwalt, 503 P.3d 1211 (Okla. 2022). “§ 4-313 See 40 O.S.Supp.2019 §§ 2-601 ¶12 Citizens argue that this administrative remedy and judicial review process provides a private right of action.”
King (W.D. Okla. 2025). “2022) (citing Okla. Stat. tit. 40 §§ 2-601 – 2-619). ProFrac argues that although Plaintiff may challenge the denial of unemployment benefits through the OESA’s administrative appeal process, the OESA does not explicitly or implicitly confer a private right of action that allows…”
Hanlon v. Bd. of Review of Oklahoma, 110 P.3d 574 (Okla. Civ. App. 2005). “See 40 O.S.2001 § 2-601. ¶ 14 Aside from the differences in the appeal process, an appeal by DRS to the Appeal Tribunal under § 2-603 was critical because it was the only available remedy that afforded due process to both DRS and Dr.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.