Oklahoma Statutes

Okla. Stat. tit. 43A, § 5-206 (2026)

Definitions

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section OK-LEGoklegislature.gov JustiaOkla. Stat. CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

As used in Sections 5-206 through 5-209 of this title: 1. "Mental health evaluation" means the examination of a person, either in person or via telemedicine, who appears to have a mental illness or be alcohol- or drug-dependent by two licensed mental health professionals, at least one of whom is a psychiatrist who is a diplomat of the American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology, a licensed clinical psychologist, or a licensed Doctor of Medicine or Doctor of Osteopathy who has received specific training for and is experienced in performing mental health therapeutic, diagnostic, or counseling functions, for the purpose of: a. determining if a petition requesting involuntary commitment or treatment is warranted, b. completing a mental health evaluation pursuant to Section 5-414 of this title, or c. both subparagraphs a and b of this paragraph; 2. "Initial assessment (medical necessity review)" means the examination of a person, either in person or via telemedicine, who appears to be a mentally ill person, an alcohol-dependent person, or a drug-dependent person and a person requiring treatment, whose condition is such that it appears that emergency detention may be warranted by a licensed mental health professional at a facility approved by the Commissioner of Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services, or a designee, as appropriate for such examination to determine if emergency detention of the person is warranted; 3. "Emergency detention" means the detention of a person who appears to be a person requiring treatment in a facility approved by the Commissioner of Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services as appropriate for such detention after the completion of an emergency examination, either in person or via telemedicine, and a determination that emergency detention is warranted for a period not to exceed one hundred twenty (120) hours or five (5) days, excluding weekends and holidays, except upon a court order authorizing detention beyond this period or pending the hearing on a petition requesting involuntary commitment or treatment as provided by Section 5-206 et seq. of this title. If during the emergency detention a person who appears to be a person requiring treatment becomes medically unstable, the time limit on the emergency detention period stipulated in this paragraph shall be tolled until

the person who appears to be a person requiring treatment is medically stabilized; 4. "Protective custody" means the taking into protective custody and detention of a person pursuant to the provisions of Section 5-208 of this title until such time as an emergency examination is completed and a determination is made as to whether or not emergency detention is warranted; and 5. "Prehearing detention" means the court-ordered detention of a person who is alleged to be mentally ill, alcohol-dependent, or drug-dependent in a facility approved by the Commissioner as appropriate for such detention, pending a hearing on a petition requesting involuntary commitment or treatment as provided by Section 5-415 of this title. Added by Laws 1988, c. 260, § 4, eff. Nov. 1, 1988. Amended by Laws 1993, c. 312, § 1, emerg. eff. June 7, 1993; Laws 1997, c. 387, § 1, eff. Nov. 1, 1997; Laws 1998, c. 144, § 1, emerg. eff. April 22, 1998; Laws 2002, c. 488, § 32, eff. Nov. 1, 2002; Laws 2004, c. 113, § 16, eff. Nov. 1, 2004; Laws 2006, c. 97, § 15, eff. Nov. 1, 2006; Laws 2008, c. 401, § 12, eff. Nov. 1, 2008; Laws 2010, c. 287, § 25, eff. Nov. 1, 2010; Laws 2022, c. 297, § 2, eff. Nov. 1, 2022.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1998–2022 · leading case: Brisco v. Gerard, 2023 OK CIV APP 19 (Okla. Civ. App. 2022).
Brisco v. Gerard, 2023 OK CIV APP 19 (Okla. Civ. App. 2022). “Thomann somehow constituted a mental health evaluation of Cooper pursuant to 43A O.S.2011, §§ 5-206, 5-208. Even considering the undisputed facts in the record in the light most favorable to Brisco, we find Dr.”
Brisco v. Gerard, 530 P.3d 75 (Okla. Civ. App. 2022). “43A O.S.2011, §§ 5-206 CONCLUSION ¶19 Accordingly, we affirm the district court's February 12, 2020 and August 24, 2020 orders granting summary judgment in favor of Dr.”
James v. Grand Lake M. Health (10th Cir. 1998). “James needed to be detained and transported to Oklahoma Eastern State Hospital, pursuant to the Oklahoma Emergency Detention and Protective Custody Act, Okla. Stat. tit. 43A, §§ 5-206 to 5-212. That Act provides for the emergency detention of persons who appear to be mentally…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.