Oklahoma Statutes
Okla. Stat. tit. 47, § 6-111 (2026)
See the following versions:
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
OK-LEGoklegislature.gov
JustiaOkla. Stat.
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
OS 47-6-111v1 (SB 310, Laws 2025, c. 310, § 2) OS 47-6-111v2 (HB 1751, Laws 2025, c. 330, § 5)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2013–2026 · leading case: Starkey v. Oklahoma Dep't of Corr., 2013 OK 43, 305 P.3d 1004.
Starkey v. Oklahoma Dep't of Corr., 2013 OK 43, 305 P.3d 1004. “Title 47 O.S.2011, § 6-111(D). . The scarlet letter was a means of punishment which required a person to permanently display the letter "A" for the crime of adultery described *1026 by author Nathaniel Hawthorne in his book The Scarlet Letter.”
Shaw v. Patton, 823 F.3d 556 (10th Cir. 2016). “Okla. Stat. tit. 47, § 6-111 (D) (Supp. 2009).”
Hamilton, No. 4:25-cv-00312 (N.D. Okla. June 18, 2026). “) Pursuant to Okla. Stat. tit. 47, § 6-111 (E), all three Plaintiffs have 1 The parties have consented to the jurisdiction of a U.”
Michael Crist v. State of Florida, No. 5D2022-2966 (Fla. 5th DCA Aug. 15, 2025). “§ 45-35-3 (2) (West 2020); Okla. Stat. tit. 47, § 6-111 .E.1. (2025).”
Okla. Stat. tit. 47, § 6-111(D): 1 case
Starkey v. Oklahoma Dep't of Corr., 2013 OK 43, 305 P.3d 1004. “Title 47 O.S.2011, § 6-111(D). . The scarlet letter was a means of punishment which required a person to permanently display the letter "A" for the crime of adultery described *1026 by author Nathaniel Hawthorne in his book The Scarlet Letter.”
Okla. Stat. tit. 47, § 6-111(E): 1 case
Hamilton, No. 4:25-cv-00312 (N.D. Okla. June 18, 2026). “) Pursuant to Okla. Stat. tit. 47, § 6-111 (E), all three Plaintiffs have 1 The parties have consented to the jurisdiction of a U.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.