Supplying gas to landowner. Every gas pipeline corporation or individual in this state is hereby given authority to build, construct and maintain gas pipelines, over, under, across or through all highways, bridges, streets, or alleys in this state, or any public place therein, under the supervision of the inspector of oil and gas as to where and how in said highways, bridges, streets, alleys and public places said pipe lines shall be laid, subject to the control of the local municipalities as to how the business of distribution in that municipality shall be conducted, and subject to responsibility as otherwise provided by law; provided, however, that whenever any gas pipeline crosses the land or premises of anyone outside of a municipality, said corporation shall, by request of the owner of said premises, connect said premises with a pipe line and furnish gas to said consumer at the same rate as charged in the nearest city or town. R.L.1910, § 4303. Amended by Laws 1929, c. 44, p. 56, § 3.
Notes of Decisions
Burmah Oil & Gas Co. v. Corp. Comm'n, 541 P.2d 834 (Okla. 1975).
· cites it 3× “Putman for an order directing Burmah to furnish natural gas service to his premises as provided by 52 O.S.1971 § 10, on the ground that this statute, if applied to Burmah, is unconstitutional.”
Richardson v. Mustang Fuel Corp., 772 P.2d 1324 (Okla. 1989).
“” Until 1985, Mustang continued to supply gas to all right of way grantors who requested it, such having been originally required by 52 O.S.1971 § 10, which provided in pertinent part that “whenever any gas pipeline crosses the land or premises of any one outside of a…”
Anchor Stone & Materials Co. v. Carlin, 436 P.2d 650 (Okla. 1967).
· cites it 2× “On cross-examination, Pleasant stated that he was aware of the provisions of 52 O.S.1961, § 10 requiring any corporation laying a pipeline across land outside a municipality to furnish gas to such landowner at the rate charged in the nearest city or town, and admitted that in…”
Transok Pipe Line Co. v. Richardson, 593 P.2d 1079 (Okla. 1978).
· cites it 4× “installation of a 20 inch, high-pressure, gas transmission pipe line carrying raw gas from the well-head to a commercial consumer for fuel in the generation of electricity for distribution to the public, landowners requested of Transok, and at its expense, a connection to their…”
Oklahoma Nat. Gas Co. v. Hancock, 272 P.2d 450 (Okla. 1954).
“In statute 52 O.S.1951 § 10, it is provided that every gas pipe line corporation or individual in this state is authorized to construct and maintain gas pipe lines under streets “subject to the control of the local municipalities as to how the business of distribution in that…”
Stangl v. Mustang Fuel Corp., 772 P.2d 1331 (Okla. Civ. App. 1987).
· cites it 2× “The Appellants first contend that because Mustang has provided gas to the Appellants for a number of years, that they may now be forced to continue to do so under 52 O.S.1981 § 10 and such application of the statute would not be unconstitutional and that the trial court erred in…”
Mustang Fuel Corp. v. Bd. of Cnty. Commissioners, 527 P.2d 838 (Okla. 1974).
“Mustang argues that 52 O.S.1961, § 10 supercedes § 4 and that the requirement of settling damages with the abutting landowners before constructing the pipeline is no longer applicable.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.