Revocation of parole. A. Every person, hereinafter referred to as "convict", who has been or who in the future may be sentenced to imprisonment in any state penal institution shall, in addition to any other deductions provided for by law, be entitled to a deduction from his sentence for all time during which he has been or may be on parole. The provisions of this section are hereby declared to be both retroactive and prospective, and to apply to convicts who are on parole on the effective date of this act as well as to convicts who may be paroled thereafter; and shall at the discretion of the paroling authority apply to time on a parole which has been or shall be revoked. B. Beginning November 1, 1987, the paroling authority also shall have the discretion to revoke all or any portion of the parole. Added by Laws 1959, p. 22, § 1. Amended by Laws 1981, c. 84, § 1; Laws 1987, c. 156, § 3, eff. Nov. 1, 1987.
Notes of Decisions
State Ex Rel. Wiseman v. Oklahoma Bd. of Corr., 614 P.2d 551 (Okla. 1980).
· cites it 2× “1971, § 350, see note 26 supra), the Legislature in several other instances besides § 17 has delegated considerable authority as relates to prisoners and paroles to both the Pardon and Parole Board and individual officials.”
Morehead v. State, 145 S.W.3d 922 (Mo. Ct. App. 2004).
“If Oklahoma ultimately decides not to revoke Morehead’s parole, he will receive credit against his Oklahoma sentence for the *929 time he spent on parole pursuant to Okla. Stat. Ann. tit. 57, § 350 .A. Even if Morehead’s parole is ultimately revoked as a result of the alleged…”
Johnson v. Patton, 580 F. App'x 646 (10th Cir. 2014).
· cites it 2× “Although the governor has discretion to award street-time credits when revoking parole, see Okla. Stat. Ann. tit. 57, § 350 (A), in this case the governor actually awarded such credits as part of the 2002 parole revocation.”
Chase v. Page, 456 P.2d 590 (Okla. Crim. App. 1969).
· cites it 2× “The primary issues raised in this proceeding are: (1) did the petitioner, while on parole, voluntarily return to imprisonment and is *592 he thus entitled to credit for the time spent on parole as a deduction from his total term of imprisonment under 57 O.S.1961, § 350; and, (2)…”
Harkey v. Page, 451 P.2d 25 (Okla. Crim. App. 1969).
· cites it 3× “57 O.S.1961, § 350, provides in part as follows: “Every person (hereinafter referred to as ‘convict’) who has been or who in the future may be sentenced to imprisonment in any State penal institution shall, in addition to any other deductions provided for by law, be entitled to…”
Harmon v. Booher, 271 F. App'x 704 (10th Cir. 2008).
“” Okla. Stat. tit. 57, § 350 (B) (emphasis added).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.