Conditions for release - Violations.
Any inmate in a state penal institution who has been granted a parole shall be released from the institution upon the following conditions: 1. That he comply with specified requirements of the Division of Community Services of the Department of Corrections under the active supervision of a Probation and Parole Officer. Such active supervision shall be for a period not to exceed three (3) years, except as provided in paragraph 2 of this section. 2. That he be actively supervised by a Probation and Parole Officer for an extended period not to exceed the expiration of the maximum term or terms for which he was sentenced if convicted of a sex offense or upon the determination by the Division of Community Services that the best interests of the public and the parolee will be served by such an extended period of supervision. Provided, for the purposes of this section, the term "sex offense" shall not include a violation of paragraph 1 of subsection A of Section 1021 of Title 21 of the Oklahoma Statutes. The Probation and Parole Officer, upon information sufficient to give him reasonable grounds to believe that the parolee has violated the terms of and conditions of his parole, shall notify the Deputy Director of the Division of Community Services in accordance with Section 516 of Title 57 of the Oklahoma Statutes. Added by Laws 1967, c. 261, § 12, operative July 1, 1967. Amended by Laws 1978, c. 236, § 1; Laws 1993, c. 166, § 3, eff. Sept. 1, 1993.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
4
cases, 1971–2018 · leading case:
Tryon v. State, 2018 OK CR 20, 423 P.3d 617.
Tryon v. State, 2018 OK CR 20, 423 P.3d 617.
“See 57 O.S.2011, § 512 (setting forth the conditions for release of inmates in state penal institutions who are granted parole).”
In re Habeas Corpus of Keith, 482 P.2d 942 (Okla. Crim. App. 1971).
· cites it 4× “On July 1, 1970, without petitioner having applied for, or requested a probationary status, he was released from the State Penitentiary on a “conditional release” and/or “parole or probation” — under the provisions of 57 O.S.Supp.1967, § 512. At the hearing for the writ of…”
Spurlock v. State, 720 P.2d 731 (Okla. Crim. App. 1986).
· cites it 2× “57 O.S.1981, § 512(1). However, he can be actively supervised up to the maximum term for which he was sentenced, if the Department of Corrections decides it is in the best interest of the public and the parolee.”
Tryon v. State, 2018 OK CR 20.
“See 57 O.S.2011, § 512 (setting forth the conditions for release of inmates in state penal institutions who are granted parole).”
Okla. Stat. tit. 57, § 512(1): 1 case
Spurlock v. State, 720 P.2d 731 (Okla. Crim. App. 1986).
“57 O.S.1981, § 512(1). However, he can be actively supervised up to the maximum term for which he was sentenced, if the Department of Corrections decides it is in the best interest of the public and the parolee.”
Okla. Stat. tit. 57, § 512(2): 1 case
Spurlock v. State, 720 P.2d 731 (Okla. Crim. App. 1986).
“57 O.S.1981, § 512(1). However, he can be actively supervised up to the maximum term for which he was sentenced, if the Department of Corrections decides it is in the best interest of the public and the parolee.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.