Okla. Stat. » Title 6 — BANKS AND TRUST COMPANIES
Oklahoma Statutes

Okla. Stat. tit. 6, § 101 (2026)

Short title

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section OK-LEGoklegislature.gov JustiaOkla. Stat. CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

This act may be cited as the "Oklahoma Banking Code". Added by Laws 1965, c. 161, § 101. Amended by Laws 1997, c. 111, § 1, eff. July 1, 1997; Laws 2000, c. 205, § 1, emerg. eff. May 17, 2000.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases, 1967–1999 · leading case: Gay v. Akin, 766 P.2d 985 (Okla. 1988).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Gay v. Akin, 766 P.2d 985 (Okla. 1988). “292, § 144) to provide that the Oklahoma Banking Code of 1965 (6 O.S.1981 §§ 101 et seq.) shall be governed by the new Oklahoma General Corporation Act, see supra note 3.”
Perry v. Meek, 618 P.2d 934 (Okla. 1980). “The original petition contains allegations of four causes of action against the defendants, the first allegation being that defendants allowed Guaranty to commit and participated with Guaranty in the commission of numerous violations of the Oklahoma Banking Code of 1965, 6…”
Brown v. Banking Bd., 579 P.2d 1267 (Okla. 1978). “, when that Act is not in express conflict with the provisions of Oklahoma’s Banking Code, 6 O.S.1971, § 101, et seq., (2) An absence of findings of fact to support statutory conclusions of law is fatal to a decree of the Banking Board; and (3) That in determining whether there…”
Winters v. Governor's Special Comm., 441 P.2d 370 (Okla. 1967). “The conduct, operation and management of the individual state banks selected as depositories is controlled by the Commissioner of the Banking Department and the Banking Board under the comprehensive provisions of the Oklahoma Banking Code of 1965, 6 O.S.Supp.1965 § 101 et seq.…”
Hurst v. Empie, 852 P.2d 701 (Okla. 1993). “The term, “reckless” is not defined in the Oklahoma Banking Code, 6 O.S.1981 §§ 101 et seq. In the absence of a contrary definition, we must assume that the legislature intended the words used to have the meaning attributed to them in ordinary and usual parlance.”
Victory Nat'l Bank of Nowata v. Oklahoma State Bank, Vinita, 520 P.2d 675 (Okla. 1973). “Defendant further cites provisions of the Banking Code of Oklahoma' [6 O.S.1971 § 101 et seq.], including 6 O.”
McKinney v. Jones (In Re Repub. Fin. Corp.), 77 B.R. 282 (N.D. Okla. 1987). “6 O.S. §§ 101 et seq. “Bank” is defined in the Code as “any bank authorized by the laws of the state to engage in the banking business” and “trust company” is defined as “any person doing a trust company business as set forth in this code and the trust department of banks…”
Cmty. Bankers Ass'n of Oklahoma v. Oklahoma State Banking Bd., 1999 OK 24 (Okla. 1999). “All subsequent statutory references are to the Banking Code, 6 O.S.Supp.1997, §§ 101, et seq. 3 . A branch bank is defined by Sec.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.