Okla. Stat. » Title 63 — PUBLIC HEALTH AND SAFETY
Oklahoma Statutes

Okla. Stat. tit. 63, § 1-2006 (2026)

Renumbered as § 2-7-113 of Title 27A by Laws 1993, c

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section OK-LEGoklegislature.gov JustiaOkla. Stat. CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

145, § 359, eff. July 1, 1993.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1988–1994 · leading case: Toxic Waste Impact Grp., Inc. v. Leavitt, 755 P.2d 626 (Okla. 1988).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Toxic Waste Impact Grp., Inc. v. Leavitt, 755 P.2d 626 (Okla. 1988). · cites it 7× “As required by statute, 63 O.S.1981 § 1-2006(A)(1) and (B), personal notice was given to all owners of real property located within one mile of the injection well site, in this case the Littles.”
Toxic Waste Impact Grp., Inc. v. Leavitt, 890 P.2d 906 (Okla. 1994). “5 The trial court also determined because the OCIWDA provided for notice and opportunity for a public hearing by statute [63 O.S.1981, § 1-2006(B)-(D) ], it did not matter no one timely requested a public hearing; the matter still had to conform to the individual proceeding…”
Stewart v. Rood, 796 P.2d 321 (Okla. 1990). “63 O.S.1981, § 1-2006(D). 17 As is obvious, the language of the OCIWMA, in contrast to the language used in § 2258.”
Okla. Stat. tit. 63, § 1-2006(A)(1): 1 case
Toxic Waste Impact Grp., Inc. v. Leavitt, 755 P.2d 626 (Okla. 1988). “As required by statute, 63 O.S.1981 § 1-2006(A)(1) and (B), personal notice was given to all owners of real property located within one mile of the injection well site, in this case the Littles.”
Okla. Stat. tit. 63, § 1-2006(A)(2): 1 case
Toxic Waste Impact Grp., Inc. v. Leavitt, 755 P.2d 626 (Okla. 1988). “As required by statute, 63 O.S.1981 § 1-2006(A)(1) and (B), personal notice was given to all owners of real property located within one mile of the injection well site, in this case the Littles.”
Okla. Stat. tit. 63, § 1-2006(B): 2 cases
Toxic Waste Impact Grp., Inc. v. Leavitt, 890 P.2d 906 (Okla. 1994). “5 The trial court also determined because the OCIWDA provided for notice and opportunity for a public hearing by statute [63 O.S.1981, § 1-2006(B)-(D) ], it did not matter no one timely requested a public hearing; the matter still had to conform to the individual proceeding…”
Toxic Waste Impact Grp., Inc. v. Leavitt, 755 P.2d 626 (Okla. 1988). “As required by statute, 63 O.S.1981 § 1-2006(A)(1) and (B), personal notice was given to all owners of real property located within one mile of the injection well site, in this case the Littles.”
Okla. Stat. tit. 63, § 1-2006(C): 1 case
Toxic Waste Impact Grp., Inc. v. Leavitt, 755 P.2d 626 (Okla. 1988). “As required by statute, 63 O.S.1981 § 1-2006(A)(1) and (B), personal notice was given to all owners of real property located within one mile of the injection well site, in this case the Littles.”
Okla. Stat. tit. 63, § 1-2006(D): 2 cases
Toxic Waste Impact Grp., Inc. v. Leavitt, 755 P.2d 626 (Okla. 1988). “As required by statute, 63 O.S.1981 § 1-2006(A)(1) and (B), personal notice was given to all owners of real property located within one mile of the injection well site, in this case the Littles.”
Stewart v. Rood, 796 P.2d 321 (Okla. 1990). “63 O.S.1981, § 1-2006(D). 17 As is obvious, the language of the OCIWMA, in contrast to the language used in § 2258.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.