Oklahoma Statutes

Okla. Stat. tit. 63, § 2-503.1 (2026)

Transactions involving proceeds derived from illegal

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section OK-LEGoklegislature.gov JustiaOkla. Stat. CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

drug activity prohibited - Penalties. A. It is unlawful for any person knowingly or intentionally to receive or acquire proceeds and to conceal such proceeds, or engage in transactions involving proceeds, known to be derived from any violation of the Uniform Controlled Dangerous Substances Act, Section 2-101 et seq. of this title, or of any statute of the United States relating to controlled dangerous substances as defined by the Uniform Controlled Dangerous Substances Act, Section 2-101 et seq. of this title. This subsection does not apply to any transaction between an individual and the counsel of the individual necessary to preserve the right to representation of the individual, as guaranteed by the Oklahoma Constitution and by the Sixth Amendment of the United States Constitution. However, this exception does not create any presumption against or prohibition of the right of the state to seek and obtain forfeiture of any proceeds derived from a violation of the Uniform Controlled Dangerous Substances Act, Section 2-101 et seq. of this title, or of any statute of the United States relating to controlled dangerous substances as defined by the Uniform Controlled Dangerous Substances Act, Section 2-101 et seq. of this title.

B. It is unlawful for any person knowingly or intentionally to give, sell, transfer, trade, invest, conceal, transport, or maintain an interest in or otherwise make available anything of value which that person knows is intended to be used for the purpose of committing or furthering the commission of any violation of the Uniform Controlled Dangerous Substances Act, Section 2-101 et seq. of this title, or of any statute of the United States relating to controlled dangerous substances as defined by the Uniform Controlled Dangerous Substances Act, Section 2-101 et seq. of this title. C. It is unlawful for any person knowingly or intentionally to direct, plan, organize, initiate, finance, manage, supervise, or facilitate the transportation or transfer of proceeds known to be derived from any violation of the Uniform Controlled Dangerous Substances Act, Section 2-101 et seq. of this title, or of any statute of the United States relating to controlled dangerous substances as defined by the Uniform Controlled Dangerous Substances Act, Section 2-101 et seq. of this title. D. It is unlawful for any person knowingly or intentionally to conduct a financial transaction involving proceeds derived from a violation of the Uniform Controlled Dangerous Substances Act, Section 2-101 et seq. of this title, or of any statute of the United States relating to controlled dangerous substances as defined by the Uniform Controlled Dangerous Substances Act, Section 2-101 et seq. of this title, when the transaction is designed in whole or in part to conceal or disguise the nature, location, source, ownership, or control of the proceeds known to be derived from a violation of the Uniform Controlled Dangerous Substances Act, Section 2-101 et seq. of this title, or of any statute of the United States relating to controlled dangerous substances as defined by the Uniform Controlled Dangerous Substances Act, Section 2-101 et seq. of this title, or to avoid a transaction reporting requirement under state or federal law. E. Any person convicted of violating any of the provisions of this section is guilty of a Class C2 felony offense and may be punished by imprisonment as provided for in subsections B through F of Section 20M of Title 21 of the Oklahoma Statutes, or by a fine of not more than Fifty Thousand Dollars ($50,000.00), or by both said imprisonment and fine. Added by Laws 1990, c. 232, § 8, emerg. eff. May 18, 1990. Amended by Laws 1998, c. 100, § 2, emerg. eff. April 13, 1998; Laws 2025, c. 486, § 277, eff. Jan. 1, 2026.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1996–2024 · leading case: United States v. Kitchell, 653 F.3d 1206 (10th Cir. 2011).
United States v. Kitchell, 653 F.3d 1206 (10th Cir. 2011). “Okla. Stat. tit. 63 § 2-503.1(A)-(C). Before he was indicted on felony charges, Mr.”
State v. Roberson, 2021 OK CR 16 (Okla. Crim. App. 2021). · cites it 2× “8, Acquire Proceeds from Drug Activity in concert with Katelyn Turner, in violation of 63 O.S.2011, § 2-503.1, Unlawful Possession of Drug Paraphernalia in violation of 63 O.”
Verduzco v. State, 2009 OK CR 24 (Okla. Crim. App. 2009). “2005, § 2-415, and Count 2, transporting proceeds derived from a violation of the Uniform Controlled Dangerous Substances Act, in violation of 63 O.S.2001, § 2-503.1, in Oklahoma County District Court, Case No.”
Mathues v. State, 925 P.2d 64 (Okla. Crim. App. 1996). “1991, § 2-401 (Count I); and Receiving or Acquiring Proceeds Derived from Illegal Drag Activity in violation of 63 O.S.Supp.1994, § 2-503.1 (Count II), all After Former Conviction of a Felony, in the District Court of Tulsa County, Case No.”
Holland v. Allbaugh (N.D. Okla. 2022). “Okla. Stat. tit. 63, § 2-503.1 (2011); Okla.”
State v. Velasquez, 2024 OK CR 29 (Okla. Crim. App. 2024). “2021, § 2401 63 O.S.2021, § 2-503.1 ¶2 On October 9, 2023, the Appellee filed a Motion to Quash Bindover arguing the magistrate abused her discretion in not granting relief stemming from the illegal execution of a standard search warrant.”
Hampton v. Jones, 453 F. App'x 779 (10th Cir. 2011). “63, § 2-415 ; Count II, trafficking in illegal drugs (cocaine salt) with intent to manufacture, in violation of Okla. Stat. tit. 63, § 2-415 ; Count III, possession of proceeds derived from a violation of the Uniform Controlled Dangerous Substance Act, in violation of Okla.”
Okla. Stat. tit. 63, § 2-503.1(A): 1 case
United States v. Kitchell, 653 F.3d 1206 (10th Cir. 2011). “Okla. Stat. tit. 63 § 2-503.1(A)-(C). Before he was indicted on felony charges, Mr.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.