Oklahoma Statutes
Okla. Stat. tit. 68, § 3118 (2026)
Repealed by Laws 2008, c. 82, § 8, emerg. eff. April 24,
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
OK-LEGoklegislature.gov
JustiaOkla. Stat.
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
2008.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7
cases, 1993–2017 · leading case: Wells Fargo Credit Corp. v. Selby, 2001 OK CIV APP 78 (Okla. Civ. App. 2001).
Wells Fargo Credit Corp. v. Selby, 2001 OK CIV APP 78 (Okla. Civ. App. 2001). “68 O.S.1991 § 3118(a). Further, "[a]ll service and return shall be made in the same manner as that of summons in courts of record.”
Dawson v. Douglas, 849 P.2d 441 (Okla. Civ. App. 1993). “Appellant contended in the trial court, and now in this Court, that the Tax Deed was void because she did not receive notice as required by 68 O.S.1991 § 3118. She contends notice was never served on her personally, and that the Notice by Publication, relied on by Ap-pellee, was…”
Chisholm Trail Constr., L.L.C. v. Mueggeburg, 352 P.3d 1262 (Okla. Civ. App. 2014). “68 O.S.2001, § 3118. {13 If the Treasurer did purchase the property at the tax sale, then the statute provided for resale after the redemption period.”
Question Submitted by: The Honorable Nathan Dahm, Oklahoma State Senate, Dist. 33, 2017 OK AG 17 (Okla. Att’y Gen. 2017). “68 O.S.Supp.2007, § 3118(A). If the property was unsold or purchased by the treasurer and went unredeemed, it would be subject to resale by the treasurer, which involved notice requirements and a process similar to the initial tax sale.”
Valdez v. Occupants of 3908 SW 24th Street, 270 P.3d 143 (Okla. 2011). “Title 68 O.S. § 3118 was repealed on April 24, 2008; four months prior to Ouellette filing her Notice of Application for Tax Deed.”
Berkeley Fed. Bank & Trust FSB v. Selby, 969 P.2d 369 (Okla. Civ. App. 1998). “In considering the motions for summary judgment, the trial court focused on one issue — -whether the statutory provision regarding issuance of tax deeds, 68 O.S.1991 § 3118, required actual service 3 on the record owner or whether certified mailing was sufficient.”
Johnson v. August, 125 P.3d 1243 (Okla. Civ. App. 2005). “¶ 8 TNT asserts it holds valid title because its resale tax deed grants superior title over the adverse possession claims of Plaintiffs, citing 68 O.S.2001, § 3118, and Kasner v. Wilson, 1950 OK 58 , 215 P.”
Okla. Stat. tit. 68, § 3118(A): 2 cases
Question Submitted by: The Honorable Nathan Dahm, Oklahoma State Senate, Dist. 33, 2017 OK AG 17 (Okla. Att’y Gen. 2017). “68 O.S.Supp.2007, § 3118(A). If the property was unsold or purchased by the treasurer and went unredeemed, it would be subject to resale by the treasurer, which involved notice requirements and a process similar to the initial tax sale.”
Johnson v. August, 125 P.3d 1243 (Okla. Civ. App. 2005). “¶ 8 TNT asserts it holds valid title because its resale tax deed grants superior title over the adverse possession claims of Plaintiffs, citing 68 O.S.2001, § 3118, and Kasner v. Wilson, 1950 OK 58 , 215 P.”
Okla. Stat. tit. 68, § 3118(a): 1 case
Wells Fargo Credit Corp. v. Selby, 2001 OK CIV APP 78 (Okla. Civ. App. 2001). “68 O.S.1991 § 3118(a). Further, "[a]ll service and return shall be made in the same manner as that of summons in courts of record.”
Okla. Stat. tit. 68, § 3118(b): 1 case
Wells Fargo Credit Corp. v. Selby, 2001 OK CIV APP 78 (Okla. Civ. App. 2001). “68 O.S.1991 § 3118(a). Further, "[a]ll service and return shall be made in the same manner as that of summons in courts of record.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.