Okla. Stat. » Title 70 — SCHOOLS
Oklahoma Statutes

Okla. Stat. tit. 70, § 7-1 (2026)

Repealed by Laws 1971, c. 281, § 24-127, eff. July 2,

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section OK-LEGoklegislature.gov JustiaOkla. Stat. CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

1971.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 16 cases, 1953–1998 · leading case: MacY v. Oklahoma City Sch. Dist. No. 89, 1998 OK 58 (Okla. 1998).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
MacY v. Oklahoma City Sch. Dist. No. 89, 1998 OK 58 (Okla. 1998). · cites it 6× “The relevant statutes governing notice are 70 O.S.Supp.1965 § 7-1 and 70 O.S.1961 § 4-16.”
Tryon Dependent Sch. Dist. No. 125 of Lincoln Cnty. v. Carrier, 474 P.2d 131 (Okla. 1970). · cites it 3× “The elections are authorized by 70 O.S.Supp.1969, § 7-1. Both superintendents had authority to call the elections since the two districts, or “area affected” in the language of the statute, and as construed in Caddo Independent School District, No.”
Austin v. State Bd. of Educ., 497 P.2d 218 (Okla. 1972). · cites it 2× “Petitioners herein were among those who circulated the original petition calling for the annexation election pursuant to the provisions of 70 O.S.Supp.1968, §§ 7-1. The county superintendant held that the petition contained an insufficient number of signatures and refused to…”
In Re Wickstrum, 454 P.2d 660 (Okla. 1969). · cites it 3× “Disposition of this case is controlled by 70 O.S.Supp. 1963, § 7-1, since amended in 1968, which provides, in pertinent part: "(a) The territory comprising all or part of a school district may be annexed to an adjacent school district, or to a school district in the same…”
In Re Warren Sch. Dist. Election, 384 P.2d 49 (Okla. 1963). · cites it 3× “The lower court affirmed the annexation order, finding that: (a) the petition for annexation election contained a sufficient number of signatures as provided by 70 O.S.1961 § 7-1 (a); (b) no improper representations were made to procure the signatures on the petition; and (c)…”
Haller v. Austin, 487 P.2d 1360 (Okla. 1971). · cites it 2× “JACKSON, Justice: 70 O.S.Supp.1968, § 7-1, provides that a petition for annexation of a portion of a school district to another school district must be signed “by a majority of the school district electors in the territory proposed to be annexed.”
Edwards v. Pierce, 376 P.2d 269 (Okla. 1962). “The procedural provisions and requirements for such petitions and elections are found in 70 O.S.1961 § 7-1. The applicable portion thereof provides that all or part of a school district may be annexed to another school district, when approved at an annexation election called and…”
Dominic v. Davis, 262 P.2d 143 (Okla. 1953). · cites it 2× “31, and were obtained without misrepresentation; (2) whether the named School Districts are adjacent districts or in the same transpor-- *145 tation area as provided by Title 70 O.S.1951 § 7-1, Subsection (a) ; (3) whether electors of the negro race residents of District No.”
Bryant v. Mitchell, 275 P.2d 271 (Okla. 1954). · cites it 2× “70 O.S.1951 § 7-1, authorizing the election is unconstitutional in that it violates sec.”
Appeal of the Order of Annexation Dated April 10, 1968, Issued by Wickstrum, 454 P.2d 660 (Okla. 1969). · cites it 4× “Disposition of this case is controlled by 70 O.S.Supp.1963, § 7-1, since amended in 1968, which provides, in pertinent part: “(a) The territory comprising all or part of a school district may be annexed to an adjacent school district, or to a school district in the same…”
Swezey v. Fisher, 484 P.2d 501 (Okla. 1971). “The election process contemplated by 70 O.S.Supp.1970, § 7-1, is defeated when, as here, a minority would conceivably be able to prevail based on the clock rather than the ballot box.”
Grady v. Marshall, 288 P.2d 1101 (Okla. 1955). “46, and in full compliance with the provisions of the School Code of Oklahoma, and especially Title 70 O.S.Supp.1953 § 7-1. Plaintiffs alleged that upon the filing of such petition it became the mandatory duty of the defendant to call an election to be held in such District and…”
Show all 16 citing cases →
Okla. Stat. tit. 70, § 7-1(a): 1 case
Tryon Dependent Sch. Dist. No. 125 of Lincoln Cnty. v. Carrier, 474 P.2d 131 (Okla. 1970). “The elections are authorized by 70 O.S.Supp.1969, § 7-1. Both superintendents had authority to call the elections since the two districts, or “area affected” in the language of the statute, and as construed in Caddo Independent School District, No.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.