Okla. Stat. » Title 74 — STATE GOVERNMENT
Oklahoma Statutes

Okla. Stat. tit. 74, § 840-6.5 (2026)

Repealed by Laws 2022, c. 243, § 27, emerg. eff. May

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section OK-LEGoklegislature.gov JustiaOkla. Stat. CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

11, 2022.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1998–2015 · leading case: State Ex Rel. Porter v. Ferrell, 1998 OK 41 (Okla. 1998).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State Ex Rel. Porter v. Ferrell, 1998 OK 41 (Okla. 1998). · cites it 8× “" Okla. Stat. tit. 74, § 840-6.5 (A) (emphasis added).”
Rouse v. Oklahoma Merit Prot. Comm'n, 2015 OK 7 (Okla. 2015). · cites it 4× “Title 74 O.S.2001 § 840-6.5, see note 3, supra.”
Rouse v. Oklahoma Merit Prot. Comm'n, 2015 OK 7 (Okla. 2015). · cites it 62× “The four determinative issues are whether the trial court erred in: 1) its statutory interpretation and application of 74 O.S. 2011 §840-6.5; 3 2) determining that the reasons for termination were not pretextual, or post hoc rationalizations; 3) determining that the employee was…”
Glasco v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Doc, 2008 OK 65 (Okla. 2008). “He did not appeal his termination to the Merit Protection Commission under 74 O.S.2001, § 840-6.5. In January and February of 2005, Glasco's treating physicians released him to return to work.”
Slate v. Bussey, 350 P.3d 426 (Okla. Civ. App. 2015). “Slate appealed this adverse agency action to the Commission on July 5, 2011, pursuant to 74 O.S.2011 § 840-6.5 (amended eff. Aug. 24, 2012), providing a system for the "prompt, fair, and equitable" disposition of appeals to the Commission by permanent classified employees who…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.