Oklahoma Statutes
Okla. Stat. tit. 74, § 840-6.7 (2026)
Repealed by Laws 2022, c. 243, § 27, emerg. eff. May
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
OK-LEGoklegislature.gov
JustiaOkla. Stat.
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
11, 2022.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases, 1997–2013 · leading case: Edwards v. Oklahoma Emp. Sec. Comm'n, 953 P.2d 64 (Okla. Civ. App. 1997).
Edwards v. Oklahoma Emp. Sec. Comm'n, 953 P.2d 64 (Okla. Civ. App. 1997). “74 O.S.1991 § 840-6.7(B). Most eases involve an employee of a state agency versus the employing state agency.”
Rice v. Valmont Indus., Inc., 951 F. Supp. 2d 1250 (N.D. Okla. 2013). “The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of the employer because plaintiff had not complied with 74 O.S. § 840-6.7, which requires exhaustion of administrative remedies before a discharged classified employee may bring an action in the district court.”
Okla. Stat. tit. 74, § 840-6.7(B): 1 case
Edwards v. Oklahoma Emp. Sec. Comm'n, 953 P.2d 64 (Okla. Civ. App. 1997). “74 O.S.1991 § 840-6.7(B). Most eases involve an employee of a state agency versus the employing state agency.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.