Oklahoma Statutes
Okla. Stat. tit. 78, § 91 (2026)
Limitation of actions
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
OK-LEGoklegislature.gov
JustiaOkla. Stat.
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
An action for misappropriation must be brought within three (3) years after the misappropriation is discovered or by the exercise of reasonable diligence should have been discovered. For the purposes of this section, a continuing misappropriation constitutes a single claim. Added by Laws 1986, c. 85, § 7, eff. Nov. 1, 1986.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases (3 in the last 5 years), 2024–2024 · leading case: iBall Instruments LLC v. Butler (W.D. Okla. 2024).
iBall Instruments LLC v. Butler (W.D. Okla. 2024). “78, § 85 ); see also Okla. Stat. tit. 78, § 91 (“An action [under the OUTSA] for misappropriation must be brought within three (3) years after the misappropriation is discovered or by the exercise of reasonable diligence should have been discovered.”
Credit Sage LLC v. Credit Wellness LLC (D. Wyo. 2024). “§ 40-24-106 with Okla. Stat. Ann. tit. 78, § 91 . Dana □□ nfAl WUTSA which omits any mention of ownership, the dearth of Wyoming case law imposing ownership as an element to a WUTSA claim, and the reasoning of the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals in Gaedeke in its discussion of…”
MFE Enter., Inc. v. Alphanetics, Inc. (N.D. Okla. 2024). “See Okla. Stat. tit. 78 § 91. on the market, and the ease of searching the Internet for competing scanners, MFE’s DTSA claim likely became time-barred at some point in 2020.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.