125.200
Preferences in appointing fiduciary.
The court shall appoint the most suitable person who is willing to serve as
fiduciary after giving consideration to the specific circumstances of the
respondent, any stated desire of the respondent, the relationship by blood or
marriage of the person nominated to be fiduciary to the respondent, any
preference expressed by a parent of the respondent, the estate of the
respondent and any impact on ease of administration that may result from the
appointment. [1995 c.664 §19]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
2
cases, 2003–2004 · leading case:
Burk v. Hall, 62 P.3d 394 (Or. Ct. App. 2003).
Burk v. Hall, 62 P.3d 394 (Or. Ct. App. 2003).
“3 ORS 125.200 establishes preferences in appointing fiduciaries, including a requirement that the court consider “any preference expressed by a parent of the *120 respondent.”
Grimmett v. Brooks, 89 P.3d 1238 (Or. Ct. App. 2004).
· cites it 2× “ORS 125.200 provides, in part: “The court shall appoint the most suitable person who is willing to serve as fiduciary [7] after giving consideration to the specific circumstances of the respondent, any stated desire of the respondent, * * * the estate of the respondent and any…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.