Or. Rev. Stat. » Oregon Revised Statutes
Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 132.510 (2026)

Forms of pleadings

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      132.510 Forms of pleadings. The forms of pleading, and the rules by which the sufficiency of pleadings is to be determined, are those prescribed by the statutes relating to criminal procedure. [Amended by 1973 c.836 §56]

 

      132.520 [Repealed by 1973 c.836 §358]

 

      132.530 [Repealed by 1973 c.836 §358]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 40 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1954–2025 · leading case: Antoine v. Taylor, 499 P.3d 48 (Or. 2021).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Antoine v. Taylor, 499 P.3d 48 (Or. 2021). “630(2) provides that a “defendant may demur to the accusatory instrument when it appears upon the face thereof: * * * If the accusatory instrument is an indictment, that it does not substantially conform to the requirements of ORS 132.510 to 132.560, 135.713, 135.715, 135.”
State v. Warren, 430 P.3d 1036 (Or. 2018). “As relevant here, the demurrer statute provides: "The defendant may demur to the accusatory instrument when it appears upon the face thereof: " * * * * * "(2) If the accusatory instrument is an indictment, that it does not substantially conform to the requirements of ORS 132.510…”
State v. Reyes, 308 P.2d 182 (Or. 1957). · cites it 2× “"All the forms of pleading in criminal actions heretofore existing are abolished; and hereafter the forms of pleading, and the rules by which the sufficiency of pleadings is to be determined, are those prescribed by the statutes relating to criminal procedure.”
State v. Keys, 548 P.2d 205 (Or. Ct. App. 1976). · cites it 2× “ORS 132.510. The only relevant statute, ORS 132.”
State v. Fanus, 79 P.3d 847 (Or. 2003). “he accusatory instrument when it appears upon the face thereof: “(1) If the accusatory instrument is an indictment, that the grand jury by which it was found had no legal authority to inquire into the crime charged because the same is not triable within the county; “(2) If the…”
State v. Conger, 878 P.2d 1089 (Or. 1994). · cites it 2× “he accusatory instrument when it appears upon the face thereof: "(1) If the accusatory instrument is an indictment, that the grand jury by which it was found had no legal authority to inquire into the crime charged because the same is not triable within the county; "(2) If the…”
State v. Marks, 400 P.3d 951 (Or. Ct. App. 2017). “he accusatory instrument when it appears upon the face thereof: “(1) If the accusatory instrument is an indictment, that the grand jury by which it was found had no legal authority to inquire into the crime charged because the same is not triable within the county; “(2) If the…”
State v. Waterhouse, 307 P.2d 327 (Or. 1957). · cites it 2× “630 provides: "The defendant may demur to the indictment when it appears upon the face thereof that: "(1) The grand jury by which it was found had no legal authority to inquire into the crime charged because the same is not triable within the county; "(2) It does not…”
City of Portland v. Aziz, 615 P.2d 1109 (Or. Ct. App. 1980). · cites it 2× “he accusatory instrument when it appears upon the fact thereof: "(1) If the accusatory instrument is an indictment, that the grand jury by which it was found had no legal authority to inquire into the crime charged because the same is not triable within the county; "(2) If the…”
State v. McKenzie, 771 P.2d 264 (Or. 1989). “he accusatory instrument when it appears upon the face thereof: “(1) If the accusatory instrument is an indictment, that the grand jury by which it was found had no legal authority to inquire into the crime charged because the same is not triable within the county; “(2) If the…”
State v. Reams, 616 P.2d 498 (Or. Ct. App. 1980). “ORS 132.510. The only relevant statute, ORS 132.”
State v. Pinnell, 877 P.2d 635 (Or. 1994). “he accusatory instrument when it appears upon the face thereof: "(1) If the accusatory instrument is an indictment, that the grand jury by which it was found had no legal authority to inquire into the crime charged because the same is not triable within the county; "(2) If the…”
Show all 40 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.