Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 178.345 (2026)

Prohibitions and limitations on accounts for higher education expenses

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      178.345 Prohibitions and limitations on accounts for higher education expenses. (1) An account and any interest in an account may not be assignable or pledged or otherwise used to secure or obtain a loan or other advancement.

      (2) The right of a designated beneficiary to the payment of qualified higher education expenses or of an account owner to a withdrawal, payments and withdrawals made in exercise of those rights and moneys or property held within an account shall be exempt from garnishment and may not be subject to execution, attachment or any other process or to the operation of any bankruptcy or insolvency law.

      (3) A refund of a qualified educational expense payment may not be paid by a higher education institution directly to the designated beneficiary or to the account owner. Any refund of qualified tuition expenses owed by a higher education institution on account of an overpayment of educational expenses must be refunded to the Oregon 529 Savings Network for credit to an account of the designated beneficiary.

      (4) A qualified withdrawal that is used to pay for qualified higher education expenses must be paid as prescribed by section 529 of the Internal Revenue Code and rules adopted by the Oregon 529 Savings Board.

      (5) This section applies only to accounts established for qualified higher education expenses. [Formerly 348.863]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case (1 in the last 5 years), 2025–2025 · leading case: Phillip Charles Leavell (Bankr. D. Or. 2025).
Phillip Charles Leavell (Bankr. D. Or. 2025). “”38 33 ORS 178.345(2). 34 ORS 411.760. 35 ORS 655.”
Or. Rev. Stat. § 178.345(2): 1 case
Phillip Charles Leavell (Bankr. D. Or. 2025). “”38 33 ORS 178.345(2). 34 ORS 411.760. 35 ORS 655.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.