183.335
Notice; content; public comment; temporary rule adoption, amendment or
suspension; substantial compliance required. (1) Prior to the adoption, amendment or repeal of any
rule, the agency shall give notice of its intended action:
(a) In the manner
established by rule adopted by the agency under ORS 183.341 (4), which provides
a reasonable opportunity for interested persons to be notified of the agency’s
proposed action;
(b) In the
bulletin referred to in ORS 183.360 at least 21 days prior to the effective
date;
(c) At least 28
days before the effective date, to persons who have requested notice pursuant
to subsection (8) of this section; and
(d) Delivered
only by electronic mail, at least 49 days before the effective date, to the
persons specified in subsection (15) of this section.
(2)(a) The notice
required by subsection (1) of this section must include:
(A) A caption of
not more than 15 words that reasonably identifies the subject matter of the
agency’s intended action. The agency shall include the caption on each separate
notice, statement, certificate or other similar document related to the
intended action.
(B) An objective,
simple and understandable statement summarizing the subject matter and purpose
of the intended action in sufficient detail to inform a person that the person’s
interests may be affected, and the time, place and manner in which interested
persons may present their views on the intended action.
(b) The agency
shall include with the notice of intended action given under subsection (1) of
this section:
(A) A citation of
the statutory or other legal authority relied upon and bearing upon the
promulgation of the rule;
(B) A citation of
the statute or other law the rule is intended to implement;
(C) A statement
of the need for the rule and a statement of how the rule is intended to meet
the need;
(D) A list of the
principal documents, reports or studies, if any, prepared by or relied upon by
the agency in considering the need for and in preparing the rule, and a
statement of the location at which those documents are available for public
inspection. The list may be abbreviated if necessary, and if so abbreviated
there shall be identified the location of a complete list;
(E) A statement
of fiscal impact identifying state agencies, units of local government and the
public that may be economically affected by the adoption, amendment or repeal
of the rule and an estimate of that economic impact on state agencies, units of
local government and the public. In considering the economic effect of the
proposed action on the public, the agency shall utilize available information
to project any significant economic effect of that action on businesses which
shall include a cost of compliance effect on small businesses affected. For an
agency specified in ORS 183.530, the statement of fiscal impact shall also
include a housing cost impact statement as described in ORS 183.534;
(F) A statement
identifying how adoption of the rule will affect racial equity in this state;
(G) If an
advisory committee is not appointed under the provisions of ORS 183.333, an
explanation as to why no advisory committee was used to assist the agency in
drafting the rule; and
(H) A request for
public comment on whether other options should be considered for achieving the
rule’s substantive goals while reducing the negative economic impact of the
rule on business.
(c) The Secretary
of State may omit the information submitted under paragraph (b) of this
subsection from publication in the bulletin referred to in ORS 183.360.
(d) When
providing notice of an intended action under subsection (1)(c) of this section,
the agency shall provide a copy of the rule that the agency proposes to adopt,
amend or repeal, or an explanation of how the person may acquire a copy of the
rule. The copy of an amended rule shall show all changes to the rule by
striking through material to be deleted and underlining all new material, or by
any other method that clearly shows all new and deleted material.
(3)(a) When an
agency proposes to adopt, amend or repeal a rule, it shall give interested
persons reasonable opportunity to submit data or views. Opportunity for oral
hearing shall be granted upon request received from 10 persons or from an
association having not less than 10 members before the earliest date that the
rule could become effective after the giving of notice pursuant to subsection
(1) of this section. An agency holding a hearing upon a request made under this
subsection shall give notice of the hearing at least 21 days before the hearing
to the person who has requested the hearing, to persons who have requested
notice pursuant to subsection (8) of this section and to the persons specified
in subsection (15) of this section. The agency shall publish notice of the
hearing in the bulletin referred to in ORS 183.360 at least 14 days before the
hearing. The agency shall consider fully any written or oral submission.
(b) If an agency
is required to conduct an oral hearing under paragraph (a) of this subsection,
and the rule for which the hearing is to be conducted applies only to a limited
geographical area within this state, or affects only a limited geographical area
within this state, the hearing shall be conducted within the geographical area
at the place most convenient for the majority of the residents within the
geographical area. At least 14 days before a hearing conducted under this
paragraph, the agency shall publish notice of the hearing in the bulletin
referred to in ORS 183.360 and in a newspaper of general circulation published
within the geographical area that is affected by the rule or to which the rule
applies. If a newspaper of general circulation is not published within the
geographical area that is affected by the rule or to which the rule applies,
the publication shall be made in the newspaper of general circulation published
closest to the geographical area.
(c)
Notwithstanding paragraph (a) of this subsection, the Department of Corrections
and the State Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision may adopt rules
limiting participation by adults in custody in the proposed adoption, amendment
or repeal of any rule to written submissions.
(d) If requested
by at least five persons before the earliest date that the rule could become
effective after the agency gives notice pursuant to subsection (1) of this
section, the agency shall provide a statement that identifies the objective of
the rule and a statement of how the agency will subsequently determine whether
the rule is in fact accomplishing that objective.
(e) An agency
that receives data or views concerning proposed rules from interested persons
shall maintain a record of the data or views submitted. The record shall
contain:
(A) All written
materials submitted to an agency in response to a notice of intent to adopt,
amend or repeal a rule.
(B) A recording
or summary of oral submissions received at hearings held for the purpose of
receiving those submissions.
(C) Any public
comment received in response to the request made under subsection (2)(b)(H) of
this section and the agency’s response to that comment.
(D) Any
statements provided by the agency under paragraph (d) of this subsection.
(4) Upon request
of an interested person received before the earliest date that the rule could
become effective after the giving of notice pursuant to subsection (1) of this
section, the agency shall postpone the date of its intended action no less than
21 nor more than 90 days in order to allow the requesting person an opportunity
to submit data, views or arguments concerning the proposed action. Nothing in
this subsection shall preclude an agency from adopting a temporary rule
pursuant to subsection (5) of this section.
(5)
Notwithstanding subsections (1) to (4) of this section, an agency may adopt,
amend or suspend a rule without prior notice or hearing or upon any abbreviated
notice and hearing that it finds practicable, if the agency prepares:
(a) A statement
of its findings that its failure to act promptly will result in serious
prejudice to the public interest or the interest of the parties concerned and
the specific reasons for its findings of prejudice;
(b) A citation of
the statutory or other legal authority relied upon and bearing upon the
promulgation of the rule;
(c) A statement
of the need for the rule and a statement of how the rule is intended to meet
the need;
(d) A list of the
principal documents, reports or studies, if any, prepared by or relied upon by
the agency in considering the need for and in preparing the rule, and a
statement of the location at which those documents are available for public
inspection; and
(e) For an agency
specified in ORS 183.530, a housing cost impact statement as defined in ORS
183.534.
(6)(a) A rule
adopted, amended or suspended under subsection (5) of this section is temporary
and may be effective for a period of not longer than 180 days. The adoption of
a rule under this subsection does not preclude the subsequent adoption of an
identical rule under subsections (1) to (4) of this section.
(b) A rule
temporarily suspended shall regain effectiveness upon expiration of the
temporary period of suspension unless the rule is repealed under subsections
(1) to (4) of this section.
(7)
Notwithstanding subsections (1) to (4) of this section, an agency may amend a
rule without prior notice or hearing if the amendment is solely for the purpose
of:
(a) Changing the
name of an agency by reason of a name change prescribed by law;
(b) Changing the
name of a program, office or division within an agency as long as the change in
name does not have a substantive effect on the functions of the program, office
or division;
(c) Correcting
spelling;
(d) Correcting
grammatical mistakes in a manner that does not alter the scope, application or
meaning of the rule;
(e) Correcting
statutory or rule references;
(f) Correcting
addresses or telephone numbers referred to in the rules; or
(g) Changing a
term or phrase in order to conform with a change prescribed by law.
(8)(a) Any person
may request in writing that an agency send to the person copies of the agency’s
notices of intended action issued under subsection (1) of this section. The
person must provide an address where the person elects to receive notices. The
address provided may be a postal mailing address or, if the agency provides
notice by electronic mail, may be an electronic mailing address.
(b) A request
under this subsection must indicate that the person requests one of the
following:
(A) The person
may request that the agency mail paper copies of the proposed rule and other
information required by subsection (2) of this section to the postal mailing
address.
(B) If the agency
posts notices of intended action on a website, the person may request that the
agency mail the information required by subsection (2)(a) of this section to
the postal mailing address with a reference to the website where electronic
copies of the proposed rule and other information required by subsection (2) of
this section are posted.
(C) The person
may request that the agency electronically mail the information required by
subsection (2)(a) of this section to the electronic mailing address, and either
provide electronic copies of the proposed rule and other information required
by subsection (2) of this section or provide a reference to a website where
electronic copies of the proposed rule and other information required by
subsection (2) of this section are posted.
(c) Upon receipt
of any request under this subsection, the agency shall acknowledge the request,
establish a mailing list and maintain a record of all mailings made pursuant to
the request. Agencies may establish procedures for establishing the mailing lists
and keeping the mailing lists current. Agencies by rule may establish fees
necessary to defray the costs of mailings and maintenance of the lists.
(d) Members of
the Legislative Assembly who receive notices under subsection (15) of this
section may request that an agency furnish paper copies of the notices.
(9) This section
does not apply to rules establishing an effective date for a previously
effective rule or establishing a period during which a provision of a
previously effective rule will apply.
(10) This section
does not apply to ORS 279.835 to 279.855, 279A.140 to 279A.161, 279A.250 to
279A.290, 279A.990, 279B.050 to 279B.085, 279B.200 to 279B.240, 279B.270,
279B.275, 279B.280, 279C.360, 279C.365, 279C.370, 279C.375, 279C.380, 279C.385,
279C.500 to 279C.530, 279C.540, 279C.545, 279C.550 to 279C.570, 279C.580,
279C.585, 279C.590, 279C.600 to 279C.625, 279C.650 to 279C.670 and 279C.800 to
279C.870 relating to public contracts and purchasing.
(11)(a) Except as
provided in paragraph (c) of this subsection, a rule is not valid unless
adopted in substantial compliance with the provisions of this section in effect
on the date that the notice required under subsection (1) of this section is
delivered to the Secretary of State for the purpose of publication in the
bulletin referred to in ORS 183.360.
(b) In addition
to all other requirements with which rule adoptions must comply, a rule other
than a rule amended for a purpose described in subsection (7) of this section
is not valid if the rule has not been submitted to the Legislative Counsel in
the manner required by ORS 183.355 and 183.715.
(c) A rule is not
subject to judicial review or other challenge by reason of failing to comply
with subsection (2)(a)(A) of this section.
(12)(a)
Notwithstanding the provisions of subsection (11) of this section, but subject
to paragraph (b) of this subsection, an agency may correct its failure to
substantially comply with the requirements of subsections (2) and (5) of this
section in adoption of a rule by an amended filing, as long as the
noncompliance did not substantially prejudice the interests of persons to be
affected by the rule.
(b) An agency may
use an amended filing to correct a failure to include a fiscal impact statement
in a notice of intended action, as required by subsection (2)(b)(E) of this
section, or to correct an inaccurate fiscal impact statement, only if the
agency developed the fiscal impact statement with the assistance of an advisory
committee or fiscal impact advisory committee appointed under ORS 183.333.
(13) Unless
otherwise provided by statute, the adoption, amendment or repeal of a rule by
an agency need not be based upon or supported by an evidentiary record.
(14) When an
agency has established a deadline for comment on a proposed rule under the
provisions of subsection (3)(a) of this section, the agency may not extend that
deadline for another agency or person unless the extension applies equally to
all interested agencies and persons. An agency shall not consider any
submission made by another agency after the final deadline has passed.
(15) The notices
required under subsections (1) and (3) of this section must be given by the
agency to the following persons:
(a) If the
proposed adoption, amendment or repeal results from legislation that was passed
within two years before notice is given under subsection (1) of this section,
notice shall be given to the legislator who introduced the bill that
subsequently was enacted into law, and to the chair or cochairs of all
committees that reported the bill out, except for those committees whose sole
action on the bill was referral to another committee.
(b) If the
proposed adoption, amendment or repeal does not result from legislation that
was passed within two years before notice is given under subsection (1) of this
section, notice shall be given to the chair or cochairs of any interim or
session committee with authority over the subject matter of the rule.
(c) If notice
cannot be given under paragraph (a) or (b) of this subsection, notice shall be
given to the Speaker of the House of Representatives and to the President of
the Senate who are in office on the date the notice is given.
(16)(a) Upon the
request of a member of the Legislative Assembly or of a person who would be
affected by a proposed adoption, amendment or repeal, the committees receiving
notice under subsection (15) of this section shall review the proposed
adoption, amendment or repeal for compliance with the legislation from which
the proposed adoption, amendment or repeal results.
(b) The
committees shall submit their comments on the proposed adoption, amendment or
repeal to the agency proposing the adoption, amendment or repeal. [1971 c.734 §3;
1973 c.612 §1; 1975 c.136 §11; 1975 c.759 §4; 1977 c.161 §1; 1977 c.344 §6;
1977 c.394 §1a; 1977 c.798 §2; 1979 c.593 §11; 1981 c.755 §2; 1987 c.861 §2;
1993 c.729 §3; 1995 c.652 §5; 1997 c.602 §3; 1999 c.123 §1; 1999 c.334 §1; 2001
c.220 §1; 2001 c.563 §1; 2003 c.749 §5; 2003 c.794 §206; 2005 c.17 §1; 2005
c.18 §1; 2005 c.382 §1; 2005 c.807 §5; 2007 c.115 §1; 2007 c.768 §58; 2011
c.380 §2; 2017 c.518 §2; 2019 c.213 §126; 2021 c.463 §2; 2022 c.97 §6]
Notes of Decisions
Don't Waste Oregon Comm. v. Energy Facility Siting Council, 881 P.2d 119 (Or. 1994).
· cites it 24× “) Petitioners first assert that the statement of fiscal impact that EFSC included, pursuant to ORS 183.335-(2)(b)(E), in its notice of intended rulemaking for the 1994 amendment is deficient and that the defect requires invalidation of the rule under which this application for a…”
Friends of Columbia Gorge v. Energy Fac. Siting Coun., 477 P.3d 1191 (Or. 2020).
· cites it 26× “Because, in adopting the rules, the council had failed to substantially comply with a procedural requirement in ORS 183.335, the court held that all the rules were invalid.”
Friends of Columbia Gorge v. Energy Fac. Siting Coun., 456 P.3d 635 (Or. 2020).
· cites it 27× “The court, however, agreed with petitioners’ third ground, concluding that the council had not substantially complied with ORS 183.335 (3)(d) when it failed to state how it would determine whether the 2018 rules accomplished the council’s rulemaking objec- tives.”
Oregon Cable Telecomm. Ass'n v. Dep't of Revenue, 240 P.3d 1122 (Or. Ct. App. 2010).
· cites it 13× “4 Before an agency adopts a rule, it must give notice of its intended action pursuant to ORS 183.335(1), which, among other things, requires the agency to provide “[a] statement of fiscal impact identifying state agencies, units of local government and the public which may be…”
Application of Portland Gen. Elec. Co., 561 P.2d 154 (Or. 1977).
· cites it 6× “ORS 183.335, 183.400(3). Whether or not a hearing is held, interested persons may present data or views bearing on the proposed policy without having to "prove" either their interest or their assertions; there are no "parties" to rulemaking.”
Fremont Lumber Co. v. Energy Facility Siting Council, 936 P.2d 968 (Or. 1997).
· cites it 22× “335(2)(b)fO, directs that a notice of an agency’s intent to adopt, amend, or repeal a rule include “a statement of the need for the rule and a statement of how the rule is intended to meet that need.”
Columbia Riverkeeper v. ODFW, 345 Or. App. 213 (Or. Ct. App. 2025).
· cites it 35× “In one assignment of error, petitioners argue that the amendments to those rules were adopted without compliance with applicable rulemaking procedures, in violation of ORS 183.335. We conclude that the commis- sion did not substantially comply with the notice require- ments for…”
Oregon-Columbia Chapter AGC v. ODOT (S071452), 373 Or. 405 (Or. 2025).
· cites it 25× “Nor does ODOT contend that its adoption of the CWA fits within any of the exceptions to the notice-and-comment rulemaking procedures that are set out in ORS 183.335. Finally, ODOT does not con- tend that the community benefit statute, ORS 279C.”
Bassett v. State Fish & Wildlife Comm'n, 556 P.2d 1382 (Or. Ct. App. 1976).
· cites it 8× “707(1) is made a prerequisite to rule making by ORS 183.335 (10). [3] ORS 496.162(1)(a) provides: "(1) After investigation of the supply and condition of wildlife, the commission, at appropriate times each year, shall by rule: "(a) Prescribe the times, places and manner in which…”
Dika v. Dep't of Ins. & Fin., 817 P.2d 287 (Or. 1991).
· cites it 7× “ORS 183.335 in part provides: “(1) Prior to the adoption, amendment or repeal of any rule, the agency shall give notice of its intended action: $ * * * * “(2)(b) The agency shall include with the notice of intended action * * *: * * # * % “(D) A statement of fiscal impact…”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 183.335(1) — 13 cases
Application of Portland Gen. Elec. Co., 561 P.2d 154 (Or. 1977).
“ORS 183.335, 183.400(3). Whether or not a hearing is held, interested persons may present data or views bearing on the proposed policy without having to "prove" either their interest or their assertions; there are no "parties" to rulemaking.”
Oregon Cable Telecomm. Ass'n v. Dep't of Revenue, 240 P.3d 1122 (Or. Ct. App. 2010).
“4 Before an agency adopts a rule, it must give notice of its intended action pursuant to ORS 183.335(1), which, among other things, requires the agency to provide “[a] statement of fiscal impact identifying state agencies, units of local government and the public which may be…”
Oregon-Columbia Chapter AGC v. ODOT (S071452), 373 Or. 405 (Or. 2025).
“Nor does ODOT contend that its adoption of the CWA fits within any of the exceptions to the notice-and-comment rulemaking procedures that are set out in ORS 183.335. Finally, ODOT does not con- tend that the community benefit statute, ORS 279C.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 183.335(1)(b) — 1 case
Bassett v. State Fish & Wildlife Comm'n, 556 P.2d 1382 (Or. Ct. App. 1976).
“707(1) is made a prerequisite to rule making by ORS 183.335 (10). [3] ORS 496.162(1)(a) provides: "(1) After investigation of the supply and condition of wildlife, the commission, at appropriate times each year, shall by rule: "(a) Prescribe the times, places and manner in which…”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 183.335(1)(c) — 1 case
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 183.335(10) — 8 cases
Oregon-Columbia Chapter AGC v. ODOT (S071452), 373 Or. 405 (Or. 2025).
“Nor does ODOT contend that its adoption of the CWA fits within any of the exceptions to the notice-and-comment rulemaking procedures that are set out in ORS 183.335. Finally, ODOT does not con- tend that the community benefit statute, ORS 279C.”
Bassett v. State Fish & Wildlife Comm'n, 556 P.2d 1382 (Or. Ct. App. 1976).
“707(1) is made a prerequisite to rule making by ORS 183.335 (10). [3] ORS 496.162(1)(a) provides: "(1) After investigation of the supply and condition of wildlife, the commission, at appropriate times each year, shall by rule: "(a) Prescribe the times, places and manner in which…”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 183.335(10)(a) — 7 cases
Don't Waste Oregon Comm. v. Energy Facility Siting Council, 881 P.2d 119 (Or. 1994).
“) Petitioners first assert that the statement of fiscal impact that EFSC included, pursuant to ORS 183.335-(2)(b)(E), in its notice of intended rulemaking for the 1994 amendment is deficient and that the defect requires invalidation of the rule under which this application for a…”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 183.335(11) — 4 cases
Fremont Lumber Co. v. Energy Facility Siting Council, 936 P.2d 968 (Or. 1997).
“335(2)(b)fO, directs that a notice of an agency’s intent to adopt, amend, or repeal a rule include “a statement of the need for the rule and a statement of how the rule is intended to meet that need.”
Columbia Riverkeeper v. ODFW, 345 Or. App. 213 (Or. Ct. App. 2025).
“In one assignment of error, petitioners argue that the amendments to those rules were adopted without compliance with applicable rulemaking procedures, in violation of ORS 183.335. We conclude that the commis- sion did not substantially comply with the notice require- ments for…”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 183.335(11)(a) — 6 cases
Friends of Columbia Gorge v. Energy Fac. Siting Coun., 456 P.3d 635 (Or. 2020).
“The court, however, agreed with petitioners’ third ground, concluding that the council had not substantially complied with ORS 183.335 (3)(d) when it failed to state how it would determine whether the 2018 rules accomplished the council’s rulemaking objec- tives.”
Columbia Riverkeeper v. ODFW, 345 Or. App. 213 (Or. Ct. App. 2025).
“In one assignment of error, petitioners argue that the amendments to those rules were adopted without compliance with applicable rulemaking procedures, in violation of ORS 183.335. We conclude that the commis- sion did not substantially comply with the notice require- ments for…”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 183.335(11)(c) — 1 case
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 183.335(12) — 3 cases
Don't Waste Oregon Comm. v. Energy Facility Siting Council, 881 P.2d 119 (Or. 1994).
“) Petitioners first assert that the statement of fiscal impact that EFSC included, pursuant to ORS 183.335-(2)(b)(E), in its notice of intended rulemaking for the 1994 amendment is deficient and that the defect requires invalidation of the rule under which this application for a…”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 183.335(13) — 4 cases
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 183.335(2) — 7 cases
Bassett v. State Fish & Wildlife Comm'n, 556 P.2d 1382 (Or. Ct. App. 1976).
“707(1) is made a prerequisite to rule making by ORS 183.335 (10). [3] ORS 496.162(1)(a) provides: "(1) After investigation of the supply and condition of wildlife, the commission, at appropriate times each year, shall by rule: "(a) Prescribe the times, places and manner in which…”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 183.335(2)(a) — 6 cases
Columbia Riverkeeper v. ODFW, 345 Or. App. 213 (Or. Ct. App. 2025).
“In one assignment of error, petitioners argue that the amendments to those rules were adopted without compliance with applicable rulemaking procedures, in violation of ORS 183.335. We conclude that the commis- sion did not substantially comply with the notice require- ments for…”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 183.335(2)(a)(A) — 1 case
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 183.335(2)(a)(B) — 5 cases
Columbia Riverkeeper v. ODFW, 345 Or. App. 213 (Or. Ct. App. 2025).
“In one assignment of error, petitioners argue that the amendments to those rules were adopted without compliance with applicable rulemaking procedures, in violation of ORS 183.335. We conclude that the commis- sion did not substantially comply with the notice require- ments for…”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 183.335(2)(a)(D) — 1 case
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 183.335(2)(b) — 7 cases
Fremont Lumber Co. v. Energy Facility Siting Council, 936 P.2d 968 (Or. 1997).
“335(2)(b)fO, directs that a notice of an agency’s intent to adopt, amend, or repeal a rule include “a statement of the need for the rule and a statement of how the rule is intended to meet that need.”
Columbia Riverkeeper v. ODFW, 345 Or. App. 213 (Or. Ct. App. 2025).
“In one assignment of error, petitioners argue that the amendments to those rules were adopted without compliance with applicable rulemaking procedures, in violation of ORS 183.335. We conclude that the commis- sion did not substantially comply with the notice require- ments for…”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 183.335(2)(b)(0) — 1 case
Fremont Lumber Co. v. Energy Facility Siting Council, 936 P.2d 968 (Or. 1997).
“335(2)(b)fO, directs that a notice of an agency’s intent to adopt, amend, or repeal a rule include “a statement of the need for the rule and a statement of how the rule is intended to meet that need.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 183.335(2)(b)(A) — 1 case
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 183.335(2)(b)(B) — 1 case
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 183.335(2)(b)(C) — 6 cases
Fremont Lumber Co. v. Energy Facility Siting Council, 936 P.2d 968 (Or. 1997).
“335(2)(b)fO, directs that a notice of an agency’s intent to adopt, amend, or repeal a rule include “a statement of the need for the rule and a statement of how the rule is intended to meet that need.”
Friends of Columbia Gorge v. Energy Fac. Siting Coun., 456 P.3d 635 (Or. 2020).
“The court, however, agreed with petitioners’ third ground, concluding that the council had not substantially complied with ORS 183.335 (3)(d) when it failed to state how it would determine whether the 2018 rules accomplished the council’s rulemaking objec- tives.”
Columbia Riverkeeper v. ODFW, 345 Or. App. 213 (Or. Ct. App. 2025).
“In one assignment of error, petitioners argue that the amendments to those rules were adopted without compliance with applicable rulemaking procedures, in violation of ORS 183.335. We conclude that the commis- sion did not substantially comply with the notice require- ments for…”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 183.335(2)(b)(D) — 12 cases
Dika v. Dep't of Ins. & Fin., 817 P.2d 287 (Or. 1991).
“ORS 183.335 in part provides: “(1) Prior to the adoption, amendment or repeal of any rule, the agency shall give notice of its intended action: $ * * * * “(2)(b) The agency shall include with the notice of intended action * * *: * * # * % “(D) A statement of fiscal impact…”
Oregon Cable Telecomm. Ass'n v. Dep't of Revenue, 240 P.3d 1122 (Or. Ct. App. 2010).
“4 Before an agency adopts a rule, it must give notice of its intended action pursuant to ORS 183.335(1), which, among other things, requires the agency to provide “[a] statement of fiscal impact identifying state agencies, units of local government and the public which may be…”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 183.335(2)(b)(E) — 12 cases
Don't Waste Oregon Comm. v. Energy Facility Siting Council, 881 P.2d 119 (Or. 1994).
“) Petitioners first assert that the statement of fiscal impact that EFSC included, pursuant to ORS 183.335-(2)(b)(E), in its notice of intended rulemaking for the 1994 amendment is deficient and that the defect requires invalidation of the rule under which this application for a…”
Oregon Cable Telecomm. Ass'n v. Dep't of Revenue, 240 P.3d 1122 (Or. Ct. App. 2010).
“4 Before an agency adopts a rule, it must give notice of its intended action pursuant to ORS 183.335(1), which, among other things, requires the agency to provide “[a] statement of fiscal impact identifying state agencies, units of local government and the public which may be…”
Fremont Lumber Co. v. Energy Facility Siting Council, 936 P.2d 968 (Or. 1997).
“335(2)(b)fO, directs that a notice of an agency’s intent to adopt, amend, or repeal a rule include “a statement of the need for the rule and a statement of how the rule is intended to meet that need.”
Friends of Columbia Gorge v. Energy Fac. Siting Coun., 456 P.3d 635 (Or. 2020).
“The court, however, agreed with petitioners’ third ground, concluding that the council had not substantially complied with ORS 183.335 (3)(d) when it failed to state how it would determine whether the 2018 rules accomplished the council’s rulemaking objec- tives.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 183.335(2)(b)(F) — 1 case
Don't Waste Oregon Comm. v. Energy Facility Siting Council, 881 P.2d 119 (Or. 1994).
“) Petitioners first assert that the statement of fiscal impact that EFSC included, pursuant to ORS 183.335-(2)(b)(E), in its notice of intended rulemaking for the 1994 amendment is deficient and that the defect requires invalidation of the rule under which this application for a…”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 183.335(2)(d) — 1 case
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 183.335(3) — 6 cases
Application of Portland Gen. Elec. Co., 561 P.2d 154 (Or. 1977).
“ORS 183.335, 183.400(3). Whether or not a hearing is held, interested persons may present data or views bearing on the proposed policy without having to "prove" either their interest or their assertions; there are no "parties" to rulemaking.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 183.335(3)(a) — 3 cases
Don't Waste Oregon Comm. v. Energy Facility Siting Council, 881 P.2d 119 (Or. 1994).
“) Petitioners first assert that the statement of fiscal impact that EFSC included, pursuant to ORS 183.335-(2)(b)(E), in its notice of intended rulemaking for the 1994 amendment is deficient and that the defect requires invalidation of the rule under which this application for a…”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 183.335(3)(d) — 2 cases
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 183.335(3)(e) — 1 case
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 183.335(3)(e)(C) — 1 case
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 183.335(3)(e)(D) — 2 cases
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 183.335(5) — 19 cases
Friends of Columbia Gorge v. Energy Fac. Siting Coun., 456 P.3d 635 (Or. 2020).
“The court, however, agreed with petitioners’ third ground, concluding that the council had not substantially complied with ORS 183.335 (3)(d) when it failed to state how it would determine whether the 2018 rules accomplished the council’s rulemaking objec- tives.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 183.335(5)(a) — 10 cases
Friends of Columbia Gorge v. Energy Fac. Siting Coun., 456 P.3d 635 (Or. 2020).
“The court, however, agreed with petitioners’ third ground, concluding that the council had not substantially complied with ORS 183.335 (3)(d) when it failed to state how it would determine whether the 2018 rules accomplished the council’s rulemaking objec- tives.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 183.335(5)(b) — 2 cases
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 183.335(5)(c) — 3 cases
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 183.335(5)(d) — 2 cases
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 183.335(6)(a) — 8 cases
Friends of Columbia Gorge v. Energy Fac. Siting Coun., 456 P.3d 635 (Or. 2020).
“The court, however, agreed with petitioners’ third ground, concluding that the council had not substantially complied with ORS 183.335 (3)(d) when it failed to state how it would determine whether the 2018 rules accomplished the council’s rulemaking objec- tives.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 183.335(7) — 3 cases
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 183.335(8) — 3 cases
Oregon-Columbia Chapter AGC v. ODOT (S071452), 373 Or. 405 (Or. 2025).
“Nor does ODOT contend that its adoption of the CWA fits within any of the exceptions to the notice-and-comment rulemaking procedures that are set out in ORS 183.335. Finally, ODOT does not con- tend that the community benefit statute, ORS 279C.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 183.335(8)(a) — 1 case
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 183.335(9) — 3 cases
Oregon-Columbia Chapter AGC v. ODOT (S071452), 373 Or. 405 (Or. 2025).
“Nor does ODOT contend that its adoption of the CWA fits within any of the exceptions to the notice-and-comment rulemaking procedures that are set out in ORS 183.335. Finally, ODOT does not con- tend that the community benefit statute, ORS 279C.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 183.335(l)(a) — 3 cases
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 183.335(l)(b) — 3 cases
Bassett v. State Fish & Wildlife Comm'n, 556 P.2d 1382 (Or. Ct. App. 1976).
“707(1) is made a prerequisite to rule making by ORS 183.335 (10). [3] ORS 496.162(1)(a) provides: "(1) After investigation of the supply and condition of wildlife, the commission, at appropriate times each year, shall by rule: "(a) Prescribe the times, places and manner in which…”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 183.335(l)(c) — 1 case
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.