Or. Rev. Stat. » Oregon Revised Statutes
Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 183.462 (2026)

Agency statement of ex parte communications; notice

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      183.462 Agency statement of ex parte communications; notice. The agency shall place on the record a statement of the substance of any written or oral ex parte communications on a fact in issue made to the agency during its review of a contested case. The agency shall notify all parties of such communications and of their right to rebut the substance of the ex parte communications on the record. [1979 c.593 §36c]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9 cases, 1983–2016 · leading case: Larsen v. Bd. of Parole, 138 P.3d 16 (Or. Ct. App. 2006).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Larsen v. Bd. of Parole, 138 P.3d 16 (Or. Ct. App. 2006). “315(1) does not actually have that effect because it exempts the board from only certain statutory provisions that pertain to the conduct of contested case hearings, leaving others to apply to board proceedings. And, indeed, under the current version of the APA, that is the case.”
SAIF Corp. v. Belden, 964 P.2d 300 (Or. Ct. App. 1998). “We review for errors of law, ORS 183.462(8), and affirm. We accept the facts as found by the Board.”
Forelaws on Bd. v. Energy Facility Siting Council, 760 P.2d 212 (Or. 1988). “ORS 183.462. The communications between EFSC’s auditor and Battelle were disclosed to the other parties (albeit after the fact) and made part of the record for the purpose of showing the substance of the communications, but not as evidence.”
Liu v. Portland State Univ., 383 P.3d 294 (Or. Ct. App. 2016). “460 (examination of record by agency; right to file exceptions); ORS 183.462 (agency statement of ex parte communications and right to rebut); ORS 183.”
Samuel v. Bd. of Chiropractic Examiners, 712 P.2d 132 (Or. Ct. App. 1985). “450(2), (5); ORS 183.462. Although it is doubtful, given the nature of the basic issue at the hearing, that Bolin and Camerer received relevant factual information, the appearance of impropriety compromises the fairness of the hearing.”
Stadelman v. Builders Bd., 659 P.2d 1017 (Or. Ct. App. 1983). “ORS 183.462 requires an agency to put on the record all ex parte communications on a fact in issue and to notify all parties of such communications and their right to rebuttal.”
Knutson Towboat Co. v. Oregon Bd. of Mar. Pilots, 885 P.2d 746 (Or. Ct. App. 1994). “ORS 183.462 provides: “The agency shall place on the record a statement of the substance of any written or oral ex parte communications on a fact in issue made to the agency during its review of a contested case.”
Turnquist v. Emp. Div., 694 P.2d 1021 (Or. Ct. App. 1985). · cites it 3× “ORS 183.462 provides: “The agency shall place on the record a statement of the substance of any written or oral ex parte communications on a fact in issue made to the agency during its review of a contested case.”
Supermarket Express, L.L.C., t/a Lagoon v. Commonwealth of Virginia (Va. Ct. App. 2005). “§ 313; Or. Rev. Stat. § 183.462 ; 24 Vt. Stat. Ann.”
— Or. Rev. Stat. § 183.462(8) — 1 case
SAIF Corp. v. Belden, 964 P.2d 300 (Or. Ct. App. 1998). “We review for errors of law, ORS 183.462(8), and affirm. We accept the facts as found by the Board.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.