Oregon Revised Statutes

Or. Rev. Stat. § 222.915 (2026)

Application of ORS 222.840 to 222.915

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section ORSoregonlegislature.gov JustiaChapter on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

      222.915 Application of ORS 222.840 to 222.915. The provisions of ORS 222.840 to 222.915 do not apply to proceedings to annex territory to any city if the charter or ordinances of the city conflict with or are inconsistent with ORS 222.840 to 222.915. [1967 c.624 §12; 1971 c.673 §5]

 

PENALTIES

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1980–2020 · leading case: City of Corvallis v. State of Oregon, 464 P.3d 1127 (Or. Ct. App. 2020).
City of Corvallis v. State of Oregon, 464 P.3d 1127 (Or. Ct. App. 2020). “Corvallis challenged the order, citing ORS 222.915, which provides that the health-danger annexation statutes “do not apply to proceedings to annex territory to any city if the char- ter or ordinances of the city conflict with or are inconsistent with” them.”
Pieper v. Health Div., 606 P.2d 1145 (Or. 1980). · cites it 5× “We granted review limited to the question whether the order by the Health Division was a valid order in view of ORS 222.915, which provides that: "The provisions of ORS 222.”
City of Ashland v. Bear Creek Valley Sanitary Auth., 650 P.2d 975 (Or. Ct. App. 1982). “850 to ORS 222.915: it drew up a plan to alleviate the problem.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.